Skip to comments.Not One But 'Six Giraffe Species'
Posted on 12/22/2007 2:06:52 PM PST by blam
Not one but 'six giraffe species'
Science and nature reporter, BBC News
Giraffe populations have dropped by 30% over the past decade
The world's tallest animal, the giraffe, may actually be several species, a study has found.
A report in BMC Biology uses genetic evidence to show that there may be at least six species of giraffe in Africa.
Currently giraffes are considered to represent a single species classified into multiple subspecies.
The study shows geographic variation in hair coat colour is evident across the giraffe's range in sub-Saharan Africa, suggesting reproductive isolation.
"Using molecular techniques we found that giraffes can be classified into six groups that are reproductively isolated and not interbreeding," David Brown, the lead author of the study and a geneticist at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), told BBC News.
"The results were a surprise because although the giraffes look different, if you put them in zoos, they breed freely."
Spots and maple leaves
The study also found that the two giraffe subspecies that live closest to each other - the reticulated giraffe (Currently: Giraffa camelopardalis reticulate) in North Kenya, which has reddish round spots; and the Maasai giraffe (Currently: Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi) in South Kenya - separated 0.5 to 1.5 million years ago.
SOME GIRAFFE FACTS
* The familiar animals can grow up to 6m (20ft) in height
* Their remarkable tongues grow up to 45cm (18in) long
* Adult giraffes can weigh in excess of 1,000kg (2,200lbs)
* Long legs enable speeds of up to 35miles/hour (55km/h)
These results are interesting as giraffes are highly mobile animals. They frequently range over several hundred square kilometres and are capable of long distance movements of some 50-300km (30-170 miles), which means different populations are likely to meet.
Mr Brown added: "There are no rivers or forests to prevent breeding, but some evolutionary process is keeping the two groups reproductively separated."
The researchers have suggested this separation may be being driven by ecological differences, such as differences in vegetation at a micro-level, or even sexual selection.
"The female Maasai giraffe may be looking at the male reticulated giraffe and thinking, 'I don't look like you; I don't want to mate with you'," Mr Brown explained.
Need for conservation
Mr Brown also highlighted the conservation implications of this study: "Lumping all giraffes into one species obscures the reality that some kinds of giraffe are on the brink.
"Some of these populations number only a few hundred individuals and need immediate protection."
Over the past decade there has been a 30% drop in giraffe numbers, with total numbers under 100,000.
It is hoped that classifying current subspecies as fully fledged species will help inform conservation plans to save the most threatened populations. These include:
The Nigerian giraffe (Currently: Giraffa camelopardalis peralta). The last 160 individuals are found in found in West and Central Africa.
The Rothschild giraffe (Currently: Giraffa camelopardalis rothschildi). The last few hundred can only be found in a few protected areas in Kenya and in Murchison Falls National Park, Uganda. The animals' status is currently under review by an International Giraffe Working Group (IGWG). Its evidence will inform the IUCN Red List of threatened and endangered species.
The genetic research was supported by the US-based Wildlife Conservation Society.
Giraffes laugh at people. Elephants are just annoyed by the mere existence of people.
Will DNA decoding lead to a change in biological toponymy? Or, as the article suggests, just a word game to get funding and protection?
I wonder what the same exact DNA analysis would say about the human species?
If the different “species” can interbreed and produce fertile offspring, then they are just different breeds of giraffe. Unless they want to start calling a German Shepard a different species from a Labrador Retriever.
Giraffes are insincere.
DNA analyses of humans have been performed to a far greater extent than the equivalent on any other living organism.
I know, but politically incorrect finding would have been suppressed.
“Giraffe populations have dropped by 30% over the past decade”
OK, so if there ARE multiple species, which ones are least fit?
And is there not a government program for these underprivileged?
Darwin, bah humbug.
In other news, heard near the herd:
Hey Baby, wanna NECK?
If they don’t taste good, who cares?
If giraffes can reproduce across these differentiations, they are manifestly not separate “species.”
So off to the giraffe area they went....
Lions and tigers turn out to be the same species. A lion and tiger can interbreed and produce fertile offspring with mixed lion/tiger characteristics
If they thought there was any influence or money in it, they would try that argument; unfortunately, there seems to be no liklihood that dogs will become extinct unless we run out of meat for the planet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.