Posted on 12/22/2007 2:41:30 PM PST by COUNTrecount
Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y. introduces her daughter Chelsea Clinton, and mother Dorothy Rodham during a "Moms and Daughters Making History with Hillary" campaign event in Manchester, N.H., Saturday, Dec. 22, 2007.
"When I was a young lawyer and also a mom, I learned how difficult it was for a lot of the other women who worked in the law firm - the secretaries, the paralegals. At 3 o'clock every day, they'd all be on the phone, whispering to make sure their children were there safely. ... It was just such a time of tension and concern to make sure they got home."
It was so annoying for her to have to call the nanny constantly to check up on BJ's activities.
Lady, I don’t care WHAT you say, you’ll never get my vote.
Hillary must think female=gullible.
It’s aggressive alright
As to what it does though...
“We give a lot of lip service ...”
Wrong choice of words for a Clinton.
The only question I have is this: Who laughs at America more when seeing something like this...our Islamic enemies or our Chinese Communist enemies?
Here we are, living in a dangerous world filled with terrorism. We have the Islamic world expanding aggressively. We have the Chi-Coms pointing missiles at us and shrewdly adopting enough capitalism to compete with us economically.
And our presidential race my tilt to an inexperienced feminist, who travels around with her mom and daughter, encouraging Oprah-watching females to vote for her because she’ll give them more government handouts.
If Osama’s still alive, he’s sitting in a cave somewhere laughing his ass off.
What, 1 meal a month/year/election cycle?
VOTE. YOUR. VAGINAS.
"Take my husband...please!"
Sad end to anti-war effort ( well...its an editorial from the Berkshires...just gives me tears )
The Key phrase:
While the persistent effort of American troops has contributed to a decline in violence, the death toll has dropped primarily because there are fewer Iraqis left to kill
And she'd be right. There are a lot of women who will put sisterhood over country, and give her the election.
Judging from what I've read on various FR threads, She Who Must Not Be Named is counting on the Vagina Vote to be a lock, just like William the Impeached had the Soccer Moms.
Well ... some women.
"SO! I say to YOU! Women VOTERS of AMERICA! Remember always HANG YOUR HAT ONTO A MAN!! Men are very USEFUL to get you where you need to go! Yes, yes, some women have gotten to the pinnacle of success WITHOUT A MAN, but that's so much HARDER! SO GRAB ONTO SOMEONE WITH A PENIS TODAY and MAKE SOMETHING OF YOURSELF! It doesn't matter how he treats you! It matters HOW FAR HE GETS YOU! HANG ON, HANG ON, and do not forget to vote HILLARY! We are STRONG WOMEN and we need to STICK TOGETHER! While hanging onto someone with a PENIS!!"
We cannot survive if she-who-cannot-be-named and her Co-President return to the White House...
Wouldn’t trust this woman, and I use the term loosely, not for anything in the world.
My closing arguement to Hillary
(FReeper Video) A Little Hillary History
Youtube ^ | 12/17/07 | Me
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1940525/posts
Don’t tell them that - the straight ones will vote for Edwards.
Poor girl is in her 20's now and her folks have only had one meal with her?
I wonder if candidates understand how self-revelatory they are in some of the statements they make.
The Clintons have had nothing but money problems from their first skirmishes into public office, first arriving at the White House virtually penniless and then leaving in the same financial bind. Next stop: Ms. Clinton was able to convince her friends to finance the purchase of their new home in a particular neighborhood in New York State so she could qualify as a senatorial candidate in that district.
And she wants to discuss ‘women supporting themselves’???
Either she is borderline insane or thinks none of us have a memory worth consulting. I know one attribute she lacks - she is devoid of authentic feelings for others whatsoever - a classic narcissist.
And some misled members of our nation think this is presidential material? Because she is a female? It demeans the intent of the concept ‘women leaders’ - because throughout history females have been classicly magnificent in leadership roles throughout the ages - yet she presents that she will be the ‘first’. First perhaps in the U.S.A. but certainly not in terms of successful women leaders.
I find the idea of Hillary Clinton as president of this fine nation - comparable to Michael Jackson running a daycare for preschoolers.
Families are supposed to support themselves. It's called responsibility. Get a job!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.