Skip to comments.
Cruise missile sub
The Washington Times ^
| December 21, 2007
| Bill Gertz
Posted on 12/23/2007 1:06:09 PM PST by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: george76
Beat my own drum a tad here: When Prof. Doug Dalgleish and I wrote our book "Trident," back in 1984 (a history and analysis of the Trident sub system) we suggested at THAT time that the current power of the force was so great that SOME of the Ohio-class subs should be converted to multiple cruise-missile launching subs.
Although it's out of print, Amazon still has a few:
http://www.amazon.com/Trident-Science-International-Affairs-Dalgleish/dp/0809311267/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1198449643&sr=1-11
21
posted on
12/23/2007 2:40:46 PM PST
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: Oatka
If the Chi-Coms knock out our GPS system, The Tomahawk has other guidance systems.
TERCOM - Terrain Contour Matching. An in-flight altimeter measures the height from the TLAM to the ground and the missile will check to see if it is in the right spot from the height. It will make corrections if it does match the prestored height
DSMAC - Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation. A small image is taken of the flight path and downloaded into the TLAM before it is launched. During the flight the missile will verify that the images that it has stored correlates with the image it sees below itself. If the pictures do not match it will correct itself and then finish its mission.
Of course if GPS is knocked out, I think less accurate ICBM's would already be on the way!
22
posted on
12/23/2007 2:41:57 PM PST
by
OCC
To: LS
23
posted on
12/23/2007 2:46:01 PM PST
by
OCC
To: OCC
Get it used. They charged way too much for the new version. But if you want, have amazon send it to me and I’ll autograph it and send it on to you.
LS
24
posted on
12/23/2007 2:47:29 PM PST
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: LS
oops, to late. Just ordered a copy for 10.99. Some copies going for 75.00!
25
posted on
12/23/2007 2:50:43 PM PST
by
OCC
To: george76
I think the optimum statement here is, “emerging threat from China.”
26
posted on
12/23/2007 2:53:52 PM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: Oatka
“So what happens when the Chinese knock out the GPS satellies. What is the backup navigation for these missles?”
Back in the Day (70’s/early 80’s), tomahawks had maps programmed into each missle. Maybe that’s the back up plan.
27
posted on
12/23/2007 3:26:12 PM PST
by
DesScorp
To: george76
154 long-range cruise missiles
MAN!!!!...My little ole boat carried squat hahaha...dang ...that weapons load would take 3 days at the rate we loaded ;D
To: george76
29
posted on
12/23/2007 3:39:32 PM PST
by
tubebender
(Lost another one to the Tag Line bandit...)
To: chasio649
Reach out and touch someone
154 long-range cruise missiles
30
posted on
12/23/2007 3:40:18 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: tubebender
31
posted on
12/23/2007 3:53:43 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
Converting SSBNs into SSGNs is sheer stupidity. The USN will ultimately regret this foolhardy idea after the ChiComs take out our satellites in the next world war.
32
posted on
12/23/2007 4:28:02 PM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
To: george76
I knew a R Pearce but he died years ago. I guess it could be a relative....
33
posted on
12/23/2007 4:29:59 PM PST
by
tubebender
(Lost another one to the Tag Line bandit...)
To: Travis McGee; Jeff Head
If this doesn’t have Taiwan written all over it ........:o)
34
posted on
12/23/2007 4:50:11 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: Oatka
Launch backup GPS, Communication and Intelligence payloads from Boomers and land-based missile silos in the CONUS already in place would be my SWAG ......:o)
35
posted on
12/23/2007 4:54:07 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: Oatka
"What is the backup navigation for these missles?"
36
posted on
12/23/2007 4:58:19 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: Oatka
The GPS sats are more than 12,000 miles out into space, and I believe they are very well hardened against laser attack.
37
posted on
12/23/2007 5:15:09 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: Squantos
38
posted on
12/23/2007 5:17:04 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: RightWhale
What is the backup navigation for these missles?
One who misspells missile has no need to know.Dumb keyboard. Anyway, I'm glad the Grammar Police are on the alert and just as akkurate.
39
posted on
12/23/2007 5:47:36 PM PST
by
Oatka
(A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Converting SSBNs into SSGNs is sheer stupidity. The USN will ultimately regret this foolhardy idea after the ChiComs take out our satellites in the next world war.
Terrain mapping was good enough for the Tomahawks used in Operation Desert Storm. If GPS goes down it may not be optimal, but it should be good enough.
One thing that doesn't seem to be getting a lot of play here is the element of the Ohio SSGN conversions dealing with support of SEAL operations.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson