Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stalled at the Border [National Review Editorial]
National Review Online ^ | 21 December, 2007 | Unsigned Editorial

Posted on 12/24/2007 9:24:38 AM PST by The Pack Knight

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: All

I think it is obvious that Hunter and/or Thompson are the only real conservative choices in 08

I would have a hard time voting for any GOP who is weak on the illegal alien issue and border security.


21 posted on 12/24/2007 12:52:55 PM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Duncan Hunter for President: Lets Build That Border Fence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Maybe K-Lo took a cold shower and realized the error of her ways.


22 posted on 12/24/2007 12:55:00 PM PST by Petronski (Willard Myth Romney: 47% negatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: glmjr

Although it pains me to make this observation, there is no doubt Thompson, with his CFR membership, has a globalist pedigree.

If he makes it to the White House, the pattern is already established for Thompson and his CFR-elite cronies to continue weakening the security of America’s borders, turning a blind eye toward terrorist threats, and giving away America’s strategic advantages. Regardless of his amiable personal qualities, can the United States really afford to elect a “Bush-button” globalist president such as Fred Thompson?

I have believed for a long time now that the Council on Foreign Relations and its ancillary elitist groups are indifferent to communism. They have no ideological anchors. In their pursuit of a new world order they are prepared to deal without prejudice with a communist state, a socialist state, a democratic state, monarchy, oligarchy—it’s all the same to them.

Rear Admiral Chester Ward, USN (Retd.), who was a member of the CFR for sixteen years, has written, “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common—they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States.”

Their goal is to impose a benign stability on the quarreling family of nations through the merger and consolidation. They see the elimination of national boundaries, the suppression of racial and ethnic loyalties as the most expeditious avenue to world peace. Their rationale rests exclusively on materialism. They believe economic competition is the root cause of international tension. This approach dismisses as insignificant the form of government or the political ideology expressed by that form.


23 posted on 12/24/2007 12:58:44 PM PST by fweingart (Give Hillary a chance. (She'll change your life.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

LOL


24 posted on 12/24/2007 1:11:53 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: glmjr; All

TPM endorses Duncan Hunter

This Political Mind With Scott Fuller has now endorsed Duncan Hunter for President.
Here is the full audio from his e-radio program detailing WHY he supports Duncan Hunter and why you should too.

http://scottfuller.podcastpeople.com/posts/16483

Why Scott endorses Duncan Hunter…

* Duncan Hunter is the only modern-day conservative in the race.
* Understands judges have a responsibility to laws, not political action.
* Understands the best way to fix public education is through a school voucher program.
* He’s very good on taxes.
* It doesn’t hurt to have an ally in the Middle East.
* Has 27 years of fighting illegal immigration.
* Understands the limitations of the United Nations.
* He’s the best man for the job.

Links and contacts…

* Email the show”:mailto:fullermedia@hotmail.com


25 posted on 12/24/2007 1:24:27 PM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: glmjr

Excellent synopsis of the candidates. I’m not quite as certain of Thompson as you are but I basically agree with your points on all.


26 posted on 12/24/2007 2:29:44 PM PST by TigersEye (Be the answer to someone else's prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

PING


27 posted on 12/24/2007 7:53:09 PM PST by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Nothing against Hunter, but I’ve never heard of Scott Fuller. Who is he and why should I care what he thinks?


28 posted on 12/24/2007 8:38:32 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
"There’s no point deporting anybody until we BUILD THE FENCE."

That is exactally what I thought when I read this in the article:

"They should also explain that they will make it a priority to deport illegal immigrants who commit violent felonies."

This has been done, by ICE - over and over - only for the perpetrators to return to REcommit their crimes, usually with even more violent acts!

Deportation without secured borders is about the most stupid and dangerous endeavor ICE has ever acted upon!

29 posted on 12/24/2007 9:03:57 PM PST by yorkie ( For God so loved the world........................ that He didn't send a committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson