Skip to comments.
Biofuels Balderdash
Human Events ^
| 12/27/2007
| Michael J. Economides
Posted on 12/27/2007 7:25:46 AM PST by rhema
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: RayChuang88
I’m amazed how otherwise conservative, level headed freepers become misty-eyed enviros when it comes to far fetched ethanol/bio/wind/etc. Absent self important pols we should have been building nuke plants these past thirty years as well as exploiting the hundreds of years worth of coal that God gave us to use.
21
posted on
12/27/2007 3:37:39 PM PST
by
Jacquerie
(The Judiciary - The Despotic Branch.)
To: Jacquerie
We can use coal, but much of the coal found in the USA contains high amounts of sulfur, which is very expensive to clean up in the exhaust when burned. Coal would be better served for advanced processes to convert it to motor fuels and lubricants.
To: RayChuang88
Coal would be better served for advanced processes to convert it to motor fuels and lubricants. Yes, that is what I have be lead to believe. That is why I am not in favor of $1 per gallon subsidies & tariffs for ethanol.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson