My Full Endorsement of Fred Thompson…

http://race42008.com ^ | Dec 27, 2007 | by Tommy Oliver

[Maelstorm]

Exactly, just not on all charges.

Let us look at the other candidates:

-Huck voted to raise taxes 21 times in Arkansas and has disdain for the Club4Growth.
-Huck has pardoned more criminals than Mike Dukakis.
-Huck supported giving government services and student aid to Illegal aliens and dropping the embargo against Cuba.

-Mitt voted for universal health care and claimed to be a better friend to homosexual activists than Ted Kennedy.
-Mitt was elected in the most liberal state in the union.
(When is the last time a real conservative was elected in Massachusetts?)
-Mitt Employed illegal aliens.

I’m only going to address these two “conservative” cross dressers because Rudy wears his dress proudly.

[Nonstatist]

But, given the fact that McCain, Romney, and Giuliani are clearly big-government conservatives, Thompson has an opportunity to seize the small-government mantle

Whats wrong with that statement? Your rant is inscrutable...Heres some advice; Don't drink and type.

[commonguymd]

Someone was a few cells short of a stem; alcohol will do that to people at times if consumed in mass. I am sure he or she made sense in their head when they were typing. LMAO trying to make any sense of it on my end.

[kevkrom]

Fred lost me when he failed to vote to impeach Clinton

Technically, Clinton had already been impeached, by the House. Thompson voted to convict Clinton on one of two counts.

[visualops]

I believe “the hitler” means Hillary. Big exposure like she gets.

[Scarchin]

Nice dodge.

[Prophet in the wilderness]

Fred Thomson/Duncan Hunter .... the standard bearers for us conservatives this election cycle...

[seekthetruth]

Be sure to catch Fox News Sunday this coming Sunday. Fred is on again! GO FRED!

[Prophet in the wilderness]

" Be sure to catch Fox News Sunday this coming Sunday. Fred is on again! GO FRED!"
More Free time for Fred , looks like FOX BLUES can't ignore Fred any longer.

[raygun]

I want Hunter as the nominee. If I don't see a Hunter/Thompson or Thompson/Hunter along with Brownback/Huckabee/Romney/Paul/McCain/Giulanni as running-mate, then I willvote U.S. Constitution Party come the general election; "party" cohesiveness and "electability be damned.

If the Witch, Doofus, or Mr. Silky Pony Tail the "Baby Channeler" gets elected, its not my concern; well, yeah it is, but its not on my head.

The "exodus" from Free Republic had to do with a difference in opionion concenring "electability". Many left Free Republic becuase the expression of that opinion was quashed.

I don't give a rat's ass 'bout "electability" with concerm to "consequences".

I'm not going to vote for somebody just because they're "electable" and they're MORE in line than with my view points than not.

My non-naturalized parents have already made it clear that its either Thompson, or any of the donkey candidates.

While watching Law & Order, I stated that if I seen him on the general election ballot I'd vote for Thompson, and Dad immedieately asked "And what if he's not on the ballot? You'd vote for Hillary, or Oboma?". Of course Mom jumped in right away about how Romney is the most qualified candidate of all of them.

Of course they didn't have anything to respond concerning why McRomney is the qualified candidate contrasted to those I've mentioned. For what that's worth, Monica Lewinski has more "experience" in that regard (in the Oval Office and taking care of "Presidential business" than Shrillerary does). So what of it?

Silence.

I'm not threatening to vote U.S. Constitution Party, that's a "promise".

Don't vote for the candidate, vote for the party. If you don't like the candidate that the party is floating, vote U.S. Constitutino Party. Be a part of the U.S.A. political scene: send a message. A "third" party that gets more'n half percent "gets noticed".

[Prophet in the wilderness]

I think some here on FR would agree with you on your analysis,
however,
( at least for conservatives ) we try to find a candidate that comes close to what we believe in if we are given that choice, and this election season, we do, in 2 candidates : FRED THOMPSON and DUNCAN HUNTER
And I believe that is what your trying to say here.
I know you said, you don't care about electability, but, if are in between two candidates who hold your values, but, one of them has a better chance in getting the nomination and win the general, then, you go with that candidate without going against your principles.
Look, I would be pleased and happy if Duncan Hunter would get the nomination and beat the beast Hillary, but, even though Fred has a long shot of winning this, he has a better chance than Duncan does
The rest of the GOP candidates are just plain liberal RINOS.
I hope you can somehow talk to your mom and dad and talk some sense to them and convince them that if they vote for a Democrat, or a RINO they are making a mistake.

I wish you a HAPPY NEW YEAR !!