Posted on 12/28/2007 9:04:27 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
How many Nobel prizes has Behe? How many times has he been lauded by the National Academy of Science?
Apples and oranges, my friend. If you want to throw down re: Duesberg and AIDS, be my guest. You will be severely humbled long before the exchange has reached completion.
Wrapped up in a bow that suckers Western countries into sending funds to the mega giant pharmaceutical companies that badly need corporate welfare!
Preach it brother! It’s about time conservative woke up to the fact that they have been suckered by the AIDS parasites.
Again, please not that they have all fled at the very prospect of putting up or shutting up re: the proposed debate with Duesberg et al.
Still waiting for you to cite your sources, Alter Kaker. I’m more than willing to go over them with you once you give me something I can work with. And please spare me Wikipedia. Science papers only please.
==Yeah, just eat right and stop taking drugs and vaccines.
Almost. Not even the AIDS establishment has the gumption to call AIDS drugs a “vaccine.” Instead, they bill them as temporarily improving one’s health just before they die. Which, of course, is a crock, because what we are talking about is highly toxic chemotherapy drugs that will kill you even if you start out healthy.
It's his idea and his definition. He is asking people to believe HIV is harmless. It is his idea to infect himself to demonstrate the harmlessness of HIV.
I will take him seriously when he conducts the experiment on himself or his children.
Clara Maass and Jesse William Lazear were not chickenshit like Duesberg.
See my previous comment (#132).
JS, you are sounding more and more like Joseph Mengele with your each and every post. Long live death, and the pharma industry that promotes it.
It’s very likely that an AIDS vaccine will be invented; the doubtful question is whether it will work. If AIDS is not an infectious disease, there is zero chance of the latter.
And what of the debate I proposed between Duesberg et al and the public health officials who promote the HIV-AIDS hypothesis. Your father was a high-level public health official, so I’m sure you’re plugged in. Why not tap one of your experts to come on FR and debate Duesberg et al? What are you afraid of? Isn’t there anyone on your side who has the requisite confidence and knowledge in the HIV-AIDS hypothesis to take on the likes of Duesberg et al? Talk about running scared!
The socialists need AIDS, just like they need ‘global warming,’ to fill their coffers, and secure power over the great unwashed.
As always, follow the money.
==As always, follow the money.
And don’t follow the people who run away from debates.
And always follow people who recommend coffee enemas to cure cancer.
But I’m sure you’re all for AZT enemas to “cure” AIDS. I’d be laughing at your hypocrisy if it wasn’t so tragic. At least the coffee enemas won’t kill you. We can’t say the same thing for AZT enemas, now can we—GGG
4th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention International AIDS Society and Australasian Society for HIV Medicine—7/23/07
GERALD FRIEDLAND, M.D: Thank you. I have a question. I noticed theres a high rate of study discontinuation among the patients, was that largely related to the AZT *enema* or was that actually due to the hypersensitivity or the navira type associations and were there a difference in the discontinuation rate between the high and lower doses?
ANCHALEE AVIHINGSANON, M.D.: Yes, so we have four cases with nevirapine hypersensitivity in higher does and one in lower dose and these patients were, [inaudible] and one died from each group.
http://www.kaisernetwork.org/health_cast/uploaded_files/072307_ias_tb_transcript.pdf
PS Have you found an AIDS expert to come on FR and debate a scientist from our side??? Didn’t think so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.