Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee on "Meet the Press"
CBS News ^ | 12/30/20007 | Nancy Cords

Posted on 12/30/2007 12:02:17 PM PST by wastedpotential

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2007 12:02:19 PM PST by wastedpotential
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential
Would someone explain to the Huckster and his acolytes that a President cannot simply decree Abortion illegal.
2 posted on 12/30/2007 12:05:02 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Hillary Clinton has never done one thing right. She thinks that qualifies her to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential

Huckabee taking the day off to make negative ads. The only thing worse than Huckabee is a negative Huckabee.


3 posted on 12/30/2007 12:10:01 PM PST by claudiustg (You know it. I know it. I'm optimittstic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

A president doesn’t HAVE to decree abortion illegal. Murder is already decreed illegal.


4 posted on 12/30/2007 12:11:25 PM PST by awakened (Remember -- There are no dead atheists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential

Will you pardon your son if elected President?


5 posted on 12/30/2007 12:11:28 PM PST by claudiustg (You know it. I know it. I'm optimittstic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential
What about their kids, who are American citizens -- what happens to them, Russert wanted to know. They go with their parents, Huckabee replied. After the show, when asked by reporters how that doesn’t punish a child, Huckabee asserted, “Why is it punishing a child? To let them be with their parents?” He argued that being with their parents is more important than what country they live in.

This I agree with! I wish other candidates would take the same position.

6 posted on 12/30/2007 12:15:08 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (Real men don't vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential
Funny how Russert took Huckabee to task on his Pakistan gaffes but casually skipped asking Obama about his tough-talk willingness to attack Pakistan.

Gee, almost seems like a bias...

Nah, couldn't be.

7 posted on 12/30/2007 12:15:53 PM PST by LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot ("If you don't have my army supplied, and keep it supplied, we'll eat your mules up, sir"-Gen.Sherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential

I did watch.

The more of Huck I see, the less I like. The “bunker mentality” quip was a stupid blunder and to have him defend it is even dumber.

Bottom line: Why would I settle for a Huck when there are true conservatives to choose from?!


8 posted on 12/30/2007 12:19:17 PM PST by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential

Huckabee is dishonest and calculating in his statements. He has nothing to offer but higher taxes, release of violent criminals and huge government subsidy programs for illegal aliens. Yet he disguises his intentions behind slick responses and religious platitudes. He is so phony he makes me sick.


9 posted on 12/30/2007 12:22:25 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential

It is good to see Huckabee and Mitt fighting. The truth is coming out on both of the fiscal liberals. I do believe that fees are better than taxes because they are collected for a specific purpose where taxes are usually a grab bag to be spent on whatever the government wishes. Both Mitt and Huckabee would be horrible Presidents for anyone who wishes for straight talk and clear leadership. Mitt’s embarrassing rambling on about whether or not he marched with Martin Luther King and Hucks playing fast and loose with his seminary degree are just a prime indicator that they are more of the same. They talk like bureaucrats and make excuses like bureaucrats and don’t seem to see any limits to the role of government like bureaucrats. I’m not voting for those who raise their hands for Al Gore, Universal Health Care, government with out end, and can’t seem to stand up for the US without apologizing.

They both may be good men but they most certainly would be very painful embarrassments as President. I’m ready for a leader who is inspiring not because of his grand promises but because of the strength of his character and his ability to lead without compromising his principles or remaking himself in Washington DCs image. We need a President who knows who he is and doesn’t want the job so badly that he will do or say anything to win it.

Fred Thompson is that man. The governor from Arkansas and the Governor from Massachusetts can go back to doing what they did best which is growing government. The best leaders this country has ever had have not been the career politicians seeking the Presidency as if rabid after power and lulled to sleep by the sound of their own voice.
It has been men like George Washington, humble strong men like Abraham Lincoln and men of courage like Ronald Reagan who would not temper his faith in America for the sake of pleasing internationalist bureaucrats at home and abroad.


10 posted on 12/30/2007 12:22:56 PM PST by Maelstorm (Check out www.Fredrepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
Russert asked if elections in Pakistan should be postponed. Huckabee declined to take a position, saying “that’s their decision to make….I don’t think it would be appropriate for me to weigh in on whether they should have elections in their own country.”

I'm curious. What would happen in the US if one of the candidates was assasinated a couple of weeks before the general election? Would the Constitution permit a delay?

11 posted on 12/30/2007 12:28:38 PM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential
Huck's answers are completely unsatisfactory. His policies aren't making any sense, and he can't explain them very well. Then he has the audacity to say Mitt is running a dishonest campaign?? Look in the mirror, Huck! This guy can't be honest about his own record in Arkansas!

The more he talks, the more he came across as a classless phony.

FRed was great today. He's a mature adult that can answer a question straight.

12 posted on 12/30/2007 12:28:39 PM PST by MaestroLC ("Let him who wants peace prepare for war."--Vegetius, A.D. Fourth Century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential
About the only thing that Huck said that was cogent and intelligent is that "Mitt Romney is dishonest,"...on that piece of information, at least, I believe everyone smart-thinking FReeper can agree.
13 posted on 12/30/2007 12:29:52 PM PST by meandog (I'm one of the FEW and the BRAVE FReepers still supporting John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

No, but my understanding is that they are trying to operate under a parliamentary system.


14 posted on 12/30/2007 12:30:13 PM PST by wastedpotential (A Reagan Bush conservative from OH and ..... an unashamed Huckabee supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: meandog

I disagree, I believe his talk about abortion and his state tax record were very clear. But I also think that Mitt is acting like a politician.


15 posted on 12/30/2007 12:31:47 PM PST by wastedpotential (A Reagan Bush conservative from OH and ..... an unashamed Huckabee supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
What about their kids, who are American citizens -- what happens to them, Russert wanted to know. They go with their parents, Huckabee replied. After the show, when asked by reporters how that doesn’t punish a child, Huckabee asserted, “Why is it punishing a child? To let them be with their parents?” He argued that being with their parents is more important than what country they live in.

Problem is that Huck like the other three rinos is lying, this is directly opposite of his former position.

16 posted on 12/30/2007 12:40:09 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Yeah, but he doesn't support several of the GOP platform issues that are important to conservatives like the HLA, the FMA, Tort Reform, the No New Taxes Plege etc...

Plus, he aligned with McCain and the Gang on the McCain-Feingold fiasco and he aligned with a similar group of RINOs on a global warming climate change bill. He has a very centrist record in the senate that turned me off from Day One and makes me question his commitment to his current positions. Mostly his close relationship with McCain - that was the biggest negative, I guess.

He also has a checkered past on illegals:

Some votes are likely to draw scrutiny, particularly a series of votes in the 1990s against cracking down on illegal aliens. Those include a 1995 vote against limiting services other than emergency care and public education to illegal aliens - he was one of just six senators to oppose that proposal - and a 1996 vote against creating an employer verification system to help businesses filter out illegal aliens who apply for jobs....

But on immigration, Mr. Thompson had several votes where he bucked the pack - and seemed to favor illegal aliens.

The most stark example was his 1995 vote on the welfare overhaul, when he voted to preserve illegal aliens' ability to receive federal benefits. He was one of just six senators to vote that way....
http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/225944.aspx

17 posted on 12/30/2007 12:41:37 PM PST by redgirlinabluestate (www.MIttReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Problem is that Huck like the other three rinos is lying, this is directly opposite of his former position.

Yeah, see post #17. That's going around a lot. It seems nobody is immune.

18 posted on 12/30/2007 12:43:08 PM PST by redgirlinabluestate (www.MIttReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot

Obama and the Huckster got kid gloves treatment from Russert compared to Ron Paul who was given the third degree.


19 posted on 12/30/2007 12:46:52 PM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

“He argued that being with their parents is more important than what country they live in.”

You replied: “This I agree with! I wish other candidates would take the same position.”

Just like Elian?


20 posted on 12/30/2007 12:49:20 PM PST by RayBob (If guns kill people, can I blame misspelled words on my keyboard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson