Skip to comments.Ron Paul says he raised nearly $20 million in final quarter of 2007
Posted on 01/01/2008 12:39:23 PM PST by rfaceEdited on 01/01/2008 12:48:40 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Ron Paul said today his presidential campaign raised nearly $20 million in the last three months of 2007 from 130,000 donors.
Ron Paul brought in nearly $5.3 million that quarter.
Paul's campaign said that more than 107,000 donors were new and the average donation was about $90. More than half of the total came from two 24-hour online fund-raising events organized by supporters -- one on Nov. 5, and the second centered in Boston on Dec. 16.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
Stormfront is really coming through for him.
48 hours till the proof in the pudding.
I don’t particularly care for nuts in my pudding
Paul supporters are like oompa-loompas on meth.
If this was 1996, I would probably vote for him.
I resent his fact that he blames us for 911.
“Stormfront is really coming through for him.”
That guy supported Reagan and Bush too. Nobody expected the Gipper to get elected either.
Sorry that Paul isn’t RINO enough for you.
code pink and George soros are 19,000,000 dollars poorer also. Coincidence hmmmmmm
FReepers, say what you want but $20MM in a fiscal quarter is a lot of money. Must be getting the “insane uncle” vote from around the nation.
48 hours until he is knocked out of the race.
Wow, that sure is alot of Soros money.
The real message is that so many people looking at all the choice, choose to put their money on somebody that might actually change things and not just give “change” lip service.
anti-war money for an anti-war guy
Yeah, I can’t wait til I get my refund check from Soros. You know we get 25% on top of what we donated back. It’s a pretty sweet deal.
Come off it there bud, you just sound stupid with comments like that.
That’s pretty ironic...
What do you think RINO stands for?
Talk about Republican in name only... Can you say Libertarian? They have their own party he can run in without slapping the Republican label on him.
I got my problems with RP on the foreign policy side so he’s not my guy. That said, you are very correct in saying that we’ve got too many RINOs running at this time - McCain, Guiliani and Romney to name them. Huck, well he’s a populist, not a Republican (in spite of his party registration).
The smear job by the pro-Israel wing of the GOP (aided and abetted by the M$M) is really all about the benjamins. RP wants to end all foreign aid, and that bothers those in the party (and out) who feel that we should be continuing to give Israel money. The guilt by association tactic has been pretty successful so far - to those who aren’t really paying attention. The hypocrisy is pretty blatant since no other candidates are held to the same standard.
Paul is very RINO, that is why he had an ACU rating of only 76%. He is a moderate libertarian with ZERO accomplishments in his decades in office other that lately selling out to the anti-American left, troofers and neo-nazis.
The Paul coalition
Cindy Sheehan and Stormfront Leader Jamie Kelso at a Ron Paul rally.
Ron Paul with Stormfront leader Don Black
All that money really does is illustrate that you cannot buy votes.
Dollars do not equal votes.
Who or what are the “benjamins”?
his lies about Lincoln put him outside of the Republican fold
This isn’t guilt by association, this is relationships that are making themselves more and more apparent as time goes on.
Ron Paul is a Libertarian, he has NEVER claimed to be a conservative.
On some things, libertairians and conservatives agree. Ron Paul has not chosen to emphasize these areas of common belief, but has wandered off into some fever swamp where paranoia and suspicion of everybody else’s motives are paramount.
There is some question about WHERE the influx of cash is coming from. I would suspect some major benefactor like H. Ross Perot, but there is no Bush in this race. And George Soros is directing his efforts elsewhere.
My only fear, is that Ron Paul will think he has enough support to make his mark, and still run as a third party ticket.
But it’s his life, he can do what he wants.
I miss having conservatives in the Republican party.
So RP hasn’t been elected to Congress as a Republican ten times. That doesn’t appear to be enough for you. I’ve got my problems with him from a policy standpoint, but to say he ain’t Republican just isn’t true. He represents a side of Republican policy thought that you disagree with, but he isn’t off the reservation on many of our key issues. Lower taxes? Yep. Smaller government? Yep. (or like too many so called conservatives have you forgotten that one?) Eliminate gun control? Yep. Pro-life? Yep, and consistently so over a long period of time (and you can’t say the same about Mitt). And so on.
“not chosen to emphasize these areas of common belief” Flat out untrue.
was his district competitive, or do you just have to have the R after your name. As far as i know, we don't owe him any thanks.
David Duke was elected to congress in Louisiana and ran on the same platform of small government, low taxes, etc, that doesn’t mean he is a true Conservative Republican.
See, this is why I keep saying that a proscription, on the model of the Romans, would be the best way for dealing with traitors.
Print out a list of Ron Paul donors and others, nail it to the door of the Capitol, and then let those who deal with the problem keep a percentage of the profits, with the rest going to fund the war effort.
I don't know. If he's such a poor Republican and there are no Democrats in his district, is it really true that they couldn't come up with a single other Republican to run against him in a primary for Congress that would be more to your satisfaction?
I think it's more likely that yes, he's been elected to Congress lots of times, and yes, that's because people in his district like him.
Time for a change, let’s get a real conservative in that district.
In most of the Roman proscriptions, the marked individuals also had the option of fleeing into exile and abandoning their property.
then he was of no benefit to Republicans outside of his district. Let him continue to run there or , if he’s primaried , another Republican will represent his district. What’s the difference to the rest of us?
“That guy, you mean David Duke ...”
No. Must I spell it out for you? I mean the guy in your picture (Don Black) who actively supported & contributed to Reagan in ‘80. So are you calling everyone in Reagan’s coalition a neonazi? Are you saying that Don Black’s support influenced Reagan in any way?
ACU ratings are nice but they also include votes on topics that have nothing to do with conservatism or constitutionality, such as the Patriot Act & S 3930 (Roll Call 508) a bill authorizing military tribunals to try unlawful enemy combatants in the war on terror. Paul votes against bills that he feels are contrary to the constitution.
Paul’s lifetime rating is still 82.3%. Perhaps in ‘05 & ‘06 when he got 76% he thought unconstitutional legislation was being passed.
no, paul the skid for prez sounds stupid bud
I don’t think John McCain would endorse threatening other people with murder to force them to flee the country. I’m pretty sure that he thinks that in the marketplace of ideas, he can win. I think that’s why we have elections instead of tyrants. You can’t really believe what you’re saying, you just must think it’s a line that sounds funny. It really just sounds pathetic.
You (not you specifically, but people reading here) are either afraid Ron Paul can win, or you’re not. If you’re not, who cares? He can’t win. If you think he can win, why do you think he can win? Because a majority of the people are insane?
What I am seeing is that Paul’s supporters are more enthusiastic than the supporters of the other Republican candidates. What I have to keep asking myself is — why? If the Ron Paul supporters are able to put themselves at the top of the online polls, and there are so many more Giuliani supporters than Ron Paul supporters, why aren’t the Giuliani supporters doing anything about it? Where are the Thompson supporters beating up on Ron Paul voters all day long in the AOL straw poll? People here invented the concept of Freeping, for crying out loud. Where are Fred Thompson’s hundreds of thousands of online donors?
I mean, I’m sincerely curious about this. Given that the other Republican candidates are indeed so far ahead in the polls, why don’t they beat the Ron Paul guys in ever measure of online fundraising that there is? Or in online polls? It ought to be easy for them to do, they’re way ahead in the polls so they must have a lot of supporters. They just don’t care? They’re not that enthusiastic? I don’t see that as a good thing, and it’s not a good omen for a Republican winning in 2008. If it’s true that all of Ron Paul’s supporters are Democrats (which is a questionable assertion) then I think it’s a wake up call to all of us to see how much energy Democrats are putting into this election compared to what Republicans are doing.
Is the best we’re going to do that we’re going to nominate a candidate that no one is excited about, and then say “well at least they’re not Hillary” and hope that they win?
“as he embraces the anti-american rhetoric over the Conservative values he used to hold dear.”
Like supporting the Second Amendment when the sitting GOP president pushed congress to renew the AWB and increased the size of the BATF? Or when the leading GOP candidates ALL have supported some form of gun control, even going so far as posing for pictures with HCI?
The anti-America rhetoric that you mention is often criticizing policy much of which was set by holdovers from the Clinton administration.
A sane Republican candidate should have taken up this message, it is a needed message.
But Paul’s foreign policy ideas would be disastrous for our great nation.
We can not walk away from our role on the world stage.
Voted NO on prohibiting product misuse lawsuits on gun manufacturers. (Oct 2005)
Voted NO on prohibiting suing gunmakers & sellers for gun misuse. (Apr 2003)
Voted NO on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1. (Jun 1999)
Nor does his pretty good record on this overcome his leftist record on national security issues, his piss poor record on border security, his hundreds of millions in backdoor earmarks or his 19th century economic policy.
Thank you - Paul’s association with fringe groups should be noted. Some of that money has to come from them.
Ron Paul's Voting Record (ya, ya, I know, there is an excuse for all of these, state's rights are more important than stopping abortion and fixing the border, Ronnie is making a statement, or everyone else was voting against it and he was just playing the game, yadda, yadda, yadda)
Here are some more ‘Conservative(sic)’ votes by Paul:
Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes.
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research.
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion.
Voted YES on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons.
Voted NO on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime.
Voted NO on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism.
Voted NO on allowing school prayer during the War on Terror.
Voted NO on allowing vouchers in DC schools.
Voted NO on passage of the Bush Administration national energy policy.
Voted NO on implementing Bush-Cheney national energy policy.
Voted YES on barring website promoting Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump.
Voted NO on speeding up approval of forest thinning projects.
Voted NO on reforming the UN by restricting US funding.
Voted NO on requiring lobbyist disclosure of bundled donations.
Voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits about obesity against food providers.
Voted NO on prohibiting product misuse lawsuits on gun manufacturers
Voted NO on prohibiting suing gunmakers & sellers for gun misuse.
Voted NO on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1.
Voted NO on emergency $78B for war in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Voted NO on $266 billion Defense Appropriations bill.
Voted YES on more immigrant visas for skilled workers.
Voted YES on providing $70 million for Section 8 Housing vouchers.
Voted NO on promoting work and marriage among TANF recipients.
Voted NO on treating religious organizations equally for tax breaks.
Let's also not forget Paul's Pork Projects (that he voted for before he voted against when he calls them unconstitutional but he is just playing the game when he submits them because everyone else does it.. yadda yadda yadda..)
the Democrats know who they're running against, George W. Bush. When the Republicans know who they're running against, there'll bw more passion. BTW, Paul is running against Bush too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.