Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Fred Thompson is the best candidate (IMHO)
January 3, 2008 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 01/03/2008 6:53:38 AM PST by Jim Robinson

He's pro life, liberty, gun, constitution, originalist judges, federalism, small government, low taxes, economic freedom, secure borders, strong defense, national security, national sovereignty, etc.

He's the most reliable conservative in the field and comes without the social liberalism, abortionism, nanny statism, open borders, gun grabbing, big government, big spending, big tax leanings and unstable knife in the back RINO baggage of Giuliani, Romney, Huckabee and McCain.

He doesn't cater to the global warming, socialized health care, or open borders/amnesty crowds. Just say no to all this liberal garbage.

With Fred, we know we're getting a solid, no-nonsense, commonsense pro life and liberty conservative who will defend the nation, secure the borders, defend the constitution, appoint originalist judges, defend the Bush tax cuts, work to simplify and flatten the tax code, keep social security solvent while providing alternative private accounts, reduce government and spending, and work to return states issues to the states. Imagine that.

In fact, he comes closest to being the conservative leader I've been praying for all these years. I don't know about you, but I think it would be great to be able to enthusiastically support and work for a true conservative candidate whose principles and convictions match so many of my own.

Also, he'll beat the socks off any liberal Democrat in the debates and during the campaign. The Democrat will be pushing to end the war and bring the troops home on some arbitrary date (ie, total defeat for us), pushing for universal health care, pushing to roll back the tax cuts and increase taxes on the "rich," pushing global warming, pushing comprehensive immigration reform (amnesty), pushing for gay rights, and for any and all manner of big government nanny state/socialist federal programs.

Fred will advance the commonsense conservative constitutional/federalist answer for all these issues, ie, "no." All of the other leading Republican candidates will try to outdo the liberal in pushing one or more of the "conservative" universal health insurance plan, the "conservative" solution to global warming, the "conservative" solution to immigration reform (amnesty), the "conservative" federal solution for education, the "conservative" solution to balance the budget (ie, this means tax increases rather than cutting government), etc., etc. Now, in all of the above sentences where I enclosed the word "conservative" in quotes, re-read them as "RINO.") In other words, the RINOs will compromise and give up the fight and give in to the liberals. They win, we lose.

He also recognizes that we are in a war between civilizations and that our very survival as a free and secure nation among free and secure nations hinges on defeating Islamic extremism and ending the scourge of International terrorism. The war must be fought to the finish, and fought to the total annihilation of organized terrorism. And, no, it is NOT the same as fighting crime. War is hell!

If I were a resident of Iowa today, I know I would caucus for Fred!

GO, FRed, GO!!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008endorsements; elections; fred; fredthompson; ia2008; iowa; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-250 next last
To: Mygirlsmom

Reagan had a better track record then Fred. Nevertheless, I just do not trust Fred. I like Duncan Hunter, but he has a snowball chance in you know where. So it looks like its Mitt or Mike.


41 posted on 01/03/2008 7:11:12 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

LOL You’re a RootyBooster!


42 posted on 01/03/2008 7:11:36 AM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
And Ronald Reagan was an actor, a politician, and President of the Screen Actors Guild.

Was he a fake and a liar?

43 posted on 01/03/2008 7:11:45 AM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

FRED THOMPSON is the only choice for a true Conservative. Iowa is the first round of a very long battle, which FRED intends to win or place, then move on on to round two, South Carolina.

FRED has not worked this hard to bail after Iowa. FRED has a plan...strong and steady, building to a peak at just the right time.


44 posted on 01/03/2008 7:13:13 AM PST by Bobbisox (ALL AMERICAN FredHead FREEPER! [FRED THOMPSON will make an amazing Commander in Chief!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thank you Jim, and many will see this and this will tip the ship on the course for Fred.
I am glad someone encouraged you to write this. lol. : )

Take care Jim.
You, I and others on FR are the true patriots in this battle to stop this scourge of liberalism in our nation and Fred will be our leader to lead the way.
45 posted on 01/03/2008 7:13:47 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Anyone who calls themselves a conservative that does not support FDT is killing any chance to keep the WH in 2008. Hunter will not/cannot win and all other candidates are closet democrats or worse. Fred is not perfect but he is the best solution for this election and whoever cannot see that needs to put down the bottle.


46 posted on 01/03/2008 7:14:17 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
JR,

Huge endorsement in my book.

Thanks as a fellow Fredhead.

47 posted on 01/03/2008 7:14:58 AM PST by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

See post 41


48 posted on 01/03/2008 7:15:02 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Fred08

Issues

http://www.fred08.com/Principles/PrinciplesSummary.aspx?View=OnTheIssues

The first responsibility of government is to protect the American people, the homeland, and our way of life. Today we face the urgent threat of radical Islamic terrorists. Al Qaeda is committed to attacking us here at home, and wants to use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to kill millions. We must never give them that opportunity. We must defeat the terrorists abroad, and that begins in Iraq and Afghanistan—the central fronts in this global war. We must show the world we have the will to fight and win. A weakened America - or an America that appears weaker - will only encourage further attacks. We must persevere. As Commander-in-Chief, the president must ensure the United States has the means to achieve victory. Presidential leadership requires talking to the American people about these stakes, mapping out a clear vision for success, and devising a comprehensive strategy for achieving it. I am committed to:

 

In a few short years—not a generation from now—a fiscal tsunami that could imperil our security and economic prosperity will hit our nation and place an unfair burden of debt on our children and grandchildren. The tens of trillions of dollars in debt that will be accumulated over the next few decades will do immense harm to our economy. This burden is now estimated at $170,000 per person and $440,000 per family. Time is running out to address this looming crisis. We need market-based approaches to reform that guarantee benefits for those who need them and embrace personal responsibility and cost-effectiveness without raising taxes. Given the scope and urgency of this problem, and the burden it will place on our children, reform is not only an economic necessity, it is a moral imperative that requires action now. I am committed to:

 

The U.S. tax code is broken and a burden on U.S. taxpayers and businesses, large and small. Today’s tax code is particularly hostile to savings and investment, and it shows. To make matters worse, its complexity is a drag on our productivity and economic growth. Moreover, taxpayers spend billions of dollars and untold hours each year filling out complicated tax returns, just so they can send more money to Washington, much of it for wasteful programs and the pet projects of special interests. We need lower taxes, and we need to let taxpayers keep more of their hard-earned dollars—they know best where and how to spend them. And we need to make the system simpler and fairer for all. To ensure America’s long term prosperity and economic security, I am committed to:

 

Americans have the best healthcare in the world. Some, however, choose not be insured; others cannot afford it. Every American should be able to get health insurance coverage that is affordable, fully accessible, and portable. Coverage should meet their individual needs and put them in control. Those who propose a one-size-fits-all Washington-controlled program ignore the cost, inefficiency, and inadequate care that such a system offers. Access to affordable, portable health care can be made available for all Americans without imposing new mandates or raising taxes. Current government programs must also be streamlined and improved so that those who truly need help can get the health care they need. I am committed to a healthcare system that:

 

Our government is outdated, inefficient, and wasteful. It is often unable to perform even the most basic tasks our citizens expect. It is no longer enough just to want limited government; the American people deserve more effective government. Given today’s challenges, we cannot afford—and shouldn’t accept—anything less than a nimble, effective, and efficient government that is able to focus its resources on the important issues facing our country. It must be able act on behalf of the American people and our national interests in a timely manner. The key to competent government is strong, committed leadership from the top. The key to good government is good people who are well-managed and put the national interest first. I am committed to:

 

Strong families are the bedrock of our nation and our culture.  They are built around the sanctity of life and the institution of marriage, which is the union of a man and a woman.  To counter coarseness in today’s culture that oftentimes victimizes our children and undermines the traditional values parents want to instill, we must not only protect but strengthen the institutions of family and marriage. I am committed to:

 

Read Fred Thompson's Full Immigration Plan

The United States is a nation of immigrants. Throughout our history, legal immigrants have brought energy, ideas, strength, and diversity to our country, our economy, and our culture. This must continue. But in the post-9/11 world, immigration is more of a national security issue. A government that cannot secure its borders and determine who may enter and who may not, abrogates a fundamental responsibility. I am committed to:

 

A well-educated citizenry is vital to our security, our economy, and our democracy. Despite the tens of billions of dollars spent on education by Washington each year, and the hundreds of federal education programs now in place, our children are still falling behind, particularly in subjects crucial to the global economy in which we live. At a time when America is behind other developed countries in education excellence, the federal role in education is too intrusive and too bureaucratic, and has become part of the problem. State and local governments are closest to the parents, the kids, and the schools, and best situated to implement changes and innovations that best educate children. I am committed to:

 

Activist judges across the country seem intent on legislating from the bench to promote a culture of abortion, redefine marriage, and undermine families—in effect re-shaping the values of our entire society without the consent of the people.  We need judges who recognize their role in our democracy is to interpret, not make, the law. I am committed to:

 

The energy challenges our nation faces today are real and significant. Our dependence on foreign sources of oil threatens our national security and puts our economic prosperity at risk. America must rise to the challenge and take the steps necessary to become more energy independent before this becomes a crisis. No one solution will solve the energy challenges we face; all ideas must be on the table. Greater energy security will enhance our ability to pursue our foreign policy and national security objectives. Increasing our energy independence and investing in alternative energy sources will also produce a healthier environment. And while we don’t know for certain how or why climate change is occurring, it makes sense to take reasonable steps to reduce CO2 emissions without harming our economy. Overall, I am committed to:

 



Below you can download side-by-side comparisons of where the GOP candidates stand on:

Family Values Issues

2nd Amendment Rights and Crime

Securing America's Borders

Fiscal Responsibility







I strongly support the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms. Gun control is touted as a major crime-control measure. But some of the places with the strictest gun-control laws also have high violent-crime rates. Disarming law-abiding citizens does not prevent crime. The answer to violent crime is smart, effective, and aggressive law enforcement. The real effect of these gun-control measures is to place onerous restrictions on law-abiding citizens who use firearms for such legal activities as self-defense, sport-shooting, hunting, and collecting. I am committed to:

 


49 posted on 01/03/2008 7:16:16 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Your post is about why he’d be the best President. Alas, that doesn’t necessarily make him the best candidate.

When he entered the race, I expected him to make a much stronger showing. Whether the negative perceptions of him are fair or not, the fact is that he hasn’t been effective at countering them.

In calling him the best candidate, are you saying you think he can beef up his campaigning skills and win in November? or are you urging that we get behind the candidate best suited to be President, and forget about trying to predict who could beat the Democrat?

The argument for picking the best President is that there’s so much uncertainty in a January prediction about a November election. On the other hand, no one wants a kamikaze run. I see good arguments on each side.


50 posted on 01/03/2008 7:16:25 AM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
I suspect most of the voters have concluded he doesn’t actually want the job.

Not sure how you could possibly conclude that?

51 posted on 01/03/2008 7:16:38 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (©®™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon
Well said. I know that Hunter doesn't have the $ or name rec that Thompson does, that's why I would tend to go to Fred, as well.

Although.....Hunter Thompson sounds more like a name out of a novel and Thompson Hunter...JUST doesn't have the same punch ;-) That said...GO FRED!!!

52 posted on 01/03/2008 7:17:02 AM PST by NordP (Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Fred won’t win my State. But he has my vote. Go FRED!


53 posted on 01/03/2008 7:18:53 AM PST by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
Fred is An Attorney, Actor and politician. What do all three have in common? They are fake and liars..... Sorry I just don’t believe he is as conservative as he claims he is.....

Wow, I didn't realize that.

Clearly he's a 50% bigger fake and liar than Ronald Reagan who was only an actor and politician.

54 posted on 01/03/2008 7:19:02 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Way to go Jim!

Go FRed Go!


55 posted on 01/03/2008 7:19:26 AM PST by commonguymd (Move it to the right -Vote for Fred. Filler' up at www.fred08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

See post 41


56 posted on 01/03/2008 7:20:41 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Reagan was a lobbiest as well..


57 posted on 01/03/2008 7:20:49 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Great synopsis of Mr. Thompson. He has my vote. Personally, I like that he didn’t go barging into the race sreaming and yelling. I like his more thoughtful approach and I hear many voters in my neck of the woods saying pretty much the same. Not playing sound bite politics appeals to more people than the media can stand. (Maybe the old silent majority will show up for Fred)


58 posted on 01/03/2008 7:21:00 AM PST by truthluva ("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking" - JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

With the rise of Huck, I put the bottle down. I am a Hunter supporter, but if he cannot get the nod, FDT is the best candidate for the job.

Not flashy, not using religion, or past disasters to justify why he should be President.

Fred has been the most honest and sraightforward of all the other top tier candidates.

It is time to stop the flash and dash and get behind a good all around conservative candidate.


59 posted on 01/03/2008 7:21:25 AM PST by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

“...but he simply doesn’t give the appearance he actually wants the job.”

Ahhh, but he does! If he didn’t, he never would have entered, or gone home after his first experience in the dog and pony show that was his first debate, Lol. Instead, he has gotten stronger in his determination to campaign HIS way. To NOT reinvent himself.

I’m with Fred!

tatt


60 posted on 01/03/2008 7:21:54 AM PST by thesearethetimes... ("So long as we have such as Professor Librescu, evil will never triumph." Brujo 4 18 07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson