Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Possible Mars Impact Highlights Risk To Earth
New Scientist ^ | 1-4-2007 | David Shiga

Posted on 01/03/2008 4:38:58 PM PST by blam

Possible Mars impact highlights risk to Earth

00:01 04 January 2008
NewScientist.com news service
David Shiga

Asteroid 2007 WD5's orbit takes it from just outside Earth's orbit through Mars's orbit to the asteroid belt (Illustration: JPL/NASA)Tools

An asteroid hurtling towards Mars has a 1 in 28 chance of walloping the Red Planet, according to the latest calculations.

The rock's discovery just a couple of months before a possible impact begs the question of what would happen if it were instead headed for Earth – the only option, astronomers say, would be to evacuate any inhabited areas it might hit.

The asteroid, called 2007 WD5, was discovered on 20 November by a 1.5 metre telescope near Tucson, Arizona, US, that combs the skies as part of NASA's efforts to detect asteroids with a chance of hitting Earth.

It is an estimated 50 metres across, putting it in the same class as the Tunguska object that exploded over Siberia in 1908, flattening trees in an area extending many kilometres from the explosion.

Early calculations gave the asteroid a 1 in 75 chance of striking Mars on 30 January 2008.

Then, additional observations of the asteroid on 8 November were found in archival images from the 2.5-metre telescope at the Apache Point Observatory near Cloudcroft, New Mexico, US. As a result, NASA's Near Earth Object Program, based at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, US, reported on 28 December that the impact probability had increased to 3.9%, or about 1 in 20.

Temporary increase

But new observations taken between 29 December and 2 January using a 2.4-metre telescope at the Magdalena Ridge Observatory in New Mexico have revised the probability again, slightly lowering it to 3.6%, or about 1 in 28.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; earth; impact; mars; risk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: RightWhale

I don’t suppose there’s any chance that Mars will perturb it enough to hit earth?


21 posted on 01/03/2008 4:54:49 PM PST by null and void (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth. - M203M4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I’ve always liked the idea of using earth crossing asteroids as a means to transport supplies and equipment closer to places we needed them out in the solar system.


22 posted on 01/03/2008 4:54:52 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

We should have a continuously operating shuttle system between earth and moon, and earth and Mars if we want to get serious about this space thing. Regular operation like a city bus system. Would cost something to set up, but once operating it would save beaucoup bucks.


23 posted on 01/03/2008 4:58:21 PM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Williams

If it were to hit Mars there would be a greater risk to productive life forms than if it hit the Ninth Ward dead-on.


24 posted on 01/03/2008 5:00:35 PM PST by AbeKrieger (There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I know that one of our former astronauts has proposed the idea of a series 4 or 6 of unmanned ships that continually orbit between earth and mars. Sort of an interstellar bus line.


25 posted on 01/03/2008 5:01:45 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yeah, it’s an excellent plan if we are serious. This business of launching single flights like Apollo is way too expensive for a substantial continuing program.


26 posted on 01/03/2008 5:07:24 PM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Hillary’s campaign bus would make a good target. ;-)


27 posted on 01/03/2008 5:11:52 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me
Hmmmm. Joint session at her inauguration?
28 posted on 01/03/2008 5:17:49 PM PST by null and void (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth. - M203M4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Although it would work for Gummint science stuff, I wouldn’t see a commercial reason at all involving Mars; the asteroid belt is a different story.


29 posted on 01/03/2008 5:21:38 PM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Sticking with the space treaty is foolish. Anyone who believes that a nation like China would pass up the chance at the mineral wealth of the asteroid belt is fooling themselves.

The only thing stopping China from doing it now is the lack of ability. American corporations probably would have been well on their way without that damned treaty.


30 posted on 01/03/2008 5:27:16 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Agree on that. When the super huge pipelines are built for natural gas from Siberia or Alaska to markets thousands of miles away, or when water pipelines are built from Alaska/Canada to California or Georgia the steel requirement will be monstrous and a huge drain on the steel industry worldwide. Asteroid mining could supply that need, and already would be doing so except for the Treaty. Indeed.


31 posted on 01/03/2008 5:32:45 PM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru

How about a headline like “Mars turns Red over Asteroid; Moscow is happy.”

Do you know what Martian parents tell their children when they misbehave? “Don’t make an asteroid out of yourself.”

I know these are bad but what do you want so early in the year?

Comets rule!


32 posted on 01/03/2008 5:35:42 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Madmax, the Grinning Reaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Max Friedman

Where I went to school we were known as “The Comets” so yes we do indeed rule.


33 posted on 01/03/2008 5:40:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: blam

Maybe we can get Al Gore to start a “Save Mars!” campaign.


34 posted on 01/03/2008 5:49:23 PM PST by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén

Let’s send Al Gore TO Mars to save it. I’ll pay for that trip. Probably would need a Saturn V rocket to launch that payload.

Or we could make him the third moon of Mars - Algore - along with Deimos and Phobos.


35 posted on 01/03/2008 5:59:47 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Madmax, the Grinning Reaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"...This is one of my favorite themes which I will not go into at this time, but we could capture such an asteroid and park it for later possible use for something else....

Dude, read (FReeper) Jeff Head's book where we harvest rocks in space and convert them into "Rods From God" against the hegemonistic Chinese. It's SO you.

36 posted on 01/03/2008 6:07:23 PM PST by -=SoylentSquirrel=- (I'm really made of people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Sooner or later? Ya think? Whatever gives you that idea?


37 posted on 01/03/2008 6:19:51 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
Which do you suppose represents the greater risk to life on Earth?

....Global Warming.
or
....An asteroid strike.

If Algore really wanted to do something useful, he's promoting the wrong catastrophe.

38 posted on 01/03/2008 7:35:21 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; ...
Thanks blam.
 
Catastrophism
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

39 posted on 01/04/2008 8:49:16 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________Profile updated Sunday, December 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
the only option, astronomers say, would be to evacuate any inhabited areas it might hit.

After seeing FEMA in action before Katrina, we better get started now.

40 posted on 01/04/2008 8:54:54 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (It's as simple as ABC - Anyone But Clinton!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson