Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson Announces Endorsement of Right to Life of Wyoming
Standard Newswire ^ | 4-Jan-07 | Unknown

Posted on 01/04/2008 4:22:53 PM PST by Jay777

"We're proud to endorse Senator Thompson for president because he has a long track record of supporting pro-life principles," stated Steven Ertelt, President of Right to Life of Wyoming. "Senator Thompson had a 100% pro-life voting record during his tenure in Congress. Today, he supports overturning the Roe v Wade decision which allowed for unlimited abortions, he opposes euthanasia, and he opposes forcing taxpayers to fund scientific research that requires the destruction of human life."

Right to Life of Wyoming (RTLW) is the state affiliate of the National Right to Life Committee which has endorsed Senator Thompson for President, along with 13 other state affiliates.

"I'm blessed and honored to have the endorsement of the Right to Life of Wyoming for President of the United States," said Senator Thompson. "Thirteen right to life organizations from coast to coast have voted to endorse my candidacy, and more likely will, because they know I have stood with them yesterday, I stand with them today, and will stand with them tomorrow. They know I have the ability to win this election. They know I believe in the sanctity of life and as President I will do all that I can do to protect life."

(Excerpt) Read more at standardnewswire.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: 2008; abortion; election; electionpresident; elections; fred; fredthompson; gop; nrtl; prolife; republicans; righttolife; thompson; wy2008; wyoming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last
To: tlj18

I love your tag line.

We’ve heard from so many people who are making their first ever political donations to Fred. I think it’s a strong, positive sign. Thank you for investing in him and our future.


51 posted on 01/04/2008 5:44:04 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Fred Thompson picks up the endorsement of another of the old guard conservative lobbyist set.

Hm.


52 posted on 01/04/2008 5:44:46 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: aj7360

Fred could win the nomination, the Presidency and single-handedly find and defeat all the Islamofascists...

and Fox News would still ignore him


53 posted on 01/04/2008 5:47:28 PM PST by aj7360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Route66

I did donate to the Swift Boat Vets last year.. but this year marks my first year ever donating to a campaign.

I hope it doesn’t go for nothing.


54 posted on 01/04/2008 5:49:03 PM PST by aj7360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: aj7360

not last year... in 04...

seems like yesterday...


55 posted on 01/04/2008 5:49:46 PM PST by aj7360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Fred Thompson picks up the endorsement of another of the old guard conservative lobbyist set.

Might be related to the fact that he is the only movement conservative who will be in the debates this weekend, don't you think?

56 posted on 01/04/2008 5:49:49 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Mike Huckabee: If Gomer Pyle and Hugo Chavez had a love child this is who it would be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Thanks for the info! I thought they had a regular primary where every registered voter gets to vote! These caucus procedures are wierd! GO FRED!


57 posted on 01/04/2008 5:51:02 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

The Wyoming Caucus is tomorrow night by the way.”

Haven’t heard even a whisper of that in the media, and I live in Reno area.


58 posted on 01/04/2008 5:51:57 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
regular primary where every registered voter gets to vote

Remember, in a caucus, every registered voter gets to vote, IF THEY SHOW UP!

59 posted on 01/04/2008 5:53:09 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Mike Huckabee: If Gomer Pyle and Hugo Chavez had a love child this is who it would be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Fred Thompson picks up the endorsement of another of the old guard conservative lobbyist set.

Hm.

Endorsements are a b!tch, "right"?

Although my glass isn't full, it's still half full and NOT half empty.

Regards,

EG

60 posted on 01/04/2008 5:54:05 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: tlj18

“I just donated $100 to Fred. This is the very first time ever I have made a political donation. I did it, because however small it is, if there’s a chance it will make a difference, then it will be worth it.”

Great and good for you! I gave another $50 this morning to Fred, and will give more when I can. Every donation no matter how small still helps. GO FRED! Looking forward to the debate tomorrow night and then another one on Sunday! Fred will shine, I am sure! :)


61 posted on 01/04/2008 5:55:54 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

But he did, didn’t he?


62 posted on 01/04/2008 5:56:55 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RebekahT

My Dad lives in Casper, and from what he has said to me, Romney has the most noticable support (save for Ron Paul) and he’s brought in the most money statewide.

He has said as well that Wyoming voters vote more “personality” than they do who has a D or R next to their name. By that, he means that Cowboy Staters can recognize a RINO a little better than, say, Iowa voters.

FWIW.


63 posted on 01/04/2008 5:59:11 PM PST by GOP_Raider (Don't panic, folks. Rush Babies Will Save America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS; Jim Robinson
Although my glass isn't full, it's still half full and NOT half empty. Regards, EG

Maybe someone can convince Sen. Thompson that it would be a good idea to answer Bill O'Reilly's numerous requests to appear on his TV show.

Or, does Thompson not want his glass more than half full?

64 posted on 01/04/2008 6:01:39 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Bobbisox
WON’T PUT UP WITH CRAP FROM THE MSM (including stupid questions by moderators and pundits) –

That's what won me over-- when he bitchslapped that smarmy schoolmarm moderator in Iowa.

65 posted on 01/04/2008 6:03:58 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

Here ya go. Article on the Wy race.

http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080104/POLITICS01/801040387/1022/POLITICS


66 posted on 01/04/2008 6:04:12 PM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tlj18
Trust me it has made a difference. It will help Fred and his team. Most of all, How do you feel about yourself now? That is the most important difference.

Congratulations,
Greg

67 posted on 01/04/2008 6:04:22 PM PST by ImpBill ("America ... Where are you now?" --Greg Adams--Brownsville, TX --On the other Front Line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Route66
Two fantastic adjectives you used there friend.

Genuine as they come and you very hard to find a classier guy than Fred or Duncan Hunter.

68 posted on 01/04/2008 6:06:48 PM PST by ImpBill ("America ... Where are you now?" --Greg Adams--Brownsville, TX --On the other Front Line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill

Just saw this on Fred’s web site. Sorry to say I missed all of these appearances! Will have to look for the videos when they are available. Someone said Fred had a nice long interview with Wolf B. Anyone see them?

Here are three upcoming media appearances for Fred today:

Fred Thompson Live Interview on MSNBC with Norah O’Donnell at 3:30 pm ET
Fred Thompson Live Interview on Fox News’ Your World with Neil Cavuto at 4:00 pm ET
Fred Thompson interview on CNN’s The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer between 4-5 pm ET


69 posted on 01/04/2008 6:07:34 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Actually that is a legitmate question. What has Fred Thompson authored positively to protect the unborn in all 50 states? It’s a real question.


70 posted on 01/04/2008 6:08:30 PM PST by Lexinom (Build the fence and call China to account. GoHunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Route66
I love your tag line.

Thanks!

71 posted on 01/04/2008 6:10:14 PM PST by tlj18 (Don't give up on FRed just yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Did you even READ my post? You’re either missing something or you are purposely antagonistic and spreading disinformation. I sincerely hope it’s the former.


72 posted on 01/04/2008 6:16:10 PM PST by brothers4thID (Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID

Didn’t see it the first time.


73 posted on 01/04/2008 6:22:12 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
To my knowledge ( which I admit is incomplete as I do not have a photographic memory of every bill or amendment written during Fred’s terms as a Senator) Fred never “authored” an anti-abortion bill.

HOWEVER, he had a perfect pro-life voting records and spoke on the floor of the Senate and in committee regarding his pro-life positions. Two such examples below:


NOMINATION OF DAVID SATCHER, OF TENNESSEE, TO BE AN ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, AND SURGEON GENERAL OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE (Senate - February 10, 1998)

I have talked to him about this. I am a strong supporter of the ban on partial-birth abortions. I think there is no justification whatsoever for that onerous procedure. And, in response to questions on this issue, Dr. Satcher has said:

While I support the concept of a ban on late-term abortions, like the President I feel that if there are risks of severe health consequences for the mother then that decision should not be made by the Government, but by the woman in conjunction with her family and her physician.

Again, he supports the concept of a ban on late-term abortions but he believes there should be more thought given to the situation of severe health consequences for the mother. I understand what he is talking about.

Personally, I have concerns about that exception and its potential for abuse. Without getting into that whole debate again, I can simply say I disagree with the President’s position on that issue. However I have discussed this issue with Dr. Satcher and I have read what he has written in response to questions on this issue. I am satisfied he does not intend to use the position of Surgeon General to advocate or promote abortion in any way.

NOMINATION OF HENRY W. FOSTER, JR., TO BE MEDICAL DIRECTOR IN THE REGULAR CORPS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE AND TO BE SURGEON GENERAL OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE (Senate - June 21, 1995)

Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. President, today we are debating much more than the qualifications of Dr. Henry Foster. Few could argue he is not technically qualified. Furthermore, few, if any, would contest the fact that Henry Foster is a decent man who has worked hard and done much good in his lifetime.
I might also say, for my part I am not too caught up in these issues of credibility with regard to things that may or may not have happened a decade or more ago. I do not agree with my colleagues who say that you cannot trust this man. I hope the Members of this body are never judged by standards of consistency in other matters by which we judge some of these nominees.

However, Dr. Foster is caught up in something much bigger than himself and, therefore, so are the rest of us in this debate. Because of the way the President has used the office of Surgeon General and the appointments to it, we are now engaged in a heated national debate, one that I think is divisive and unnecessary. At a time when all of us, and especially the President, should be looking for ways to bring people together in this country, the President, by means of this appointment, has chosen instead to give a symbolic victory to one side in the abortion debate.

The President has taken the office of Surgeon General, a rather obscure office with no real authority whose purposes have traditionally been to simply promote mental and physical health, and raised it to the position of spokesperson with regard to sensitive moral and social issues. Then he has proceeded to appoint Dr. Elders to that position, one of the worst and most controversial appointments in recent years.

With that legacy, naturally the position has become one of great sensitivity to many of the American people. It is time for an appointment that will symbolize a return to matters of basic health care. It is time for an appointee who will command the attention and respect of the Nation with regard to these issues.

Instead, the President has made an `in-your-face’ appointment that was totally insensitive to the religious and moral beliefs of a large segment of the American people. One must assume the President knew the firestorm of divisiveness that this appointment would cause and that he simply assumed he would be the political winner in this national debate that would ensue, regardless of whether or not Dr. Henry Foster was confirmed.

That is not the proper use of the office of the Surgeon General and that is not the proper use of this nomination. Therefore, I choose not to endorse the President’s actions and I will not vote to confirm this nomination.

74 posted on 01/04/2008 6:23:18 PM PST by brothers4thID (Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

I would hope the balance of the debates are on substance. During the little face time FRED gets on TV are about rumors and stupid moderator’s questions. Ask FRED about the critical issues of our time and about the detailed proposals he has laid out. You notice no MSM outlet have attempted to rip them apart? That’s because they can’t and that is what has them all worried.

FRED will go up and up from here.


75 posted on 01/04/2008 6:27:18 PM PST by Bobbisox (ALL AMERICAN FredHead FREEPER! [FRED THOMPSON will make an amazing Commander in Chief!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I feel a bit embarrassed by the well-meaning Christians who are blindly jumping on Huckabee’s wagon. It’s no different from the dopey women who vote for Hillary JUST BECAUSE SHE’S A WOMAN. No thought goes into the process, no analysis. Haven’t they learned anything by watching the most famous Christian ex-President, Jimmy Carter??


76 posted on 01/04/2008 6:27:28 PM PST by ChocChipCookie (Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

Two videos of the three you mentioned are on:

http://www.blogsforfredthompson.com/

The Wolf B one is not there.


77 posted on 01/04/2008 6:31:26 PM PST by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Callahan

He is still an idiot. He has risen despite his idiotic bumbles because of a stupid ill-informed pubbie electorate, and the MSM pushing for him.


78 posted on 01/04/2008 6:38:24 PM PST by HerrBlucher (Fred will crush the beast and send her back through the gates of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
I did hear on the radio today that the feeling is the GOP candidates are kind of even in polls in Wyoming.

Searching the net, I've not found one Wyoming poll.

Anybody seen any?

79 posted on 01/04/2008 6:42:24 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bobbisox

I’ve also seen Fred’s so-called trophy wife on news channel interviews and she does very well. Other than Romney and Guilani, I haven’t seen any of the others even let their wives talk on air. The ladies should be major assets in the campaign and Fred sure doesn’t hide his.


80 posted on 01/04/2008 6:43:39 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Actually, I read after I posted to you, that there have not been any polls taken in Wyoming. Their caucus is rather wierd but word is that Fred and Romney are leading in Wyoming. Tomorrow we will see. Also read that Wyoming actually has more delegates than New Hampshire. GO FRED!


81 posted on 01/04/2008 6:48:59 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID

Anyone know if there will be “live” results from Wyoming as well?


The following indicates they will have totals as they come in from the County Conventions.

www.wygop.org

Wyoming is a caucus state and not like any I’ve read about. But then I’m not that familiar with caucus operations. It does seem to me that their procedure is the height of good ol’ boy political back patting.

Tomorrows county conventions as I understand what little I’ve read are schedule to occur at various time throughout the day [some as early as 8am and others as late as 5pm]. The counties are aligned in pairs, one county electing the national convention delegate and the other electing the alternate with the delegate/alternate reversed for the next election cycle.. One county elects both. There will be selected 12 delegates and 12 alternates.

The county conventions taking place tomorrow are attended by three representatives from each precinct within that county which were selected some time back at the precinct event. In all total there will be some 980 people divided among the various county conventions that will make the selections.... The following link gives a little info about the process:
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/WY-R.phtml

I may have misrepresented some of the process and if so I’m sure someone will correct it. In all I guess it works for Wyoming but I’d have to reserve judgement about it until I have a more indepth understanding. First glance to me looks like a lot of back scratching among the party regulars.


82 posted on 01/04/2008 6:57:29 PM PST by deport ( --- 4 days New Hampshire votes--- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: deport

Thank you for the information. I appreciate your work in tracking that down.


83 posted on 01/04/2008 7:02:51 PM PST by brothers4thID (Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID

Thank you for looking that up and posting it.


84 posted on 01/04/2008 7:04:17 PM PST by Lexinom (Build the fence and call China to account. GoHunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
Also read that Wyoming actually has more delegates than New Hampshire. GO FRED!

Thanks for the info.

Yes, this link says that Wyoming has 14 delegates and New Hampshire has 12.

I gues is John McCain was doing better in Wyoming we'd hear more about it.

85 posted on 01/04/2008 7:06:51 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Both these interviews were done today. Once anyone listens to Neil Cavuto’s interview with Fred they would see the real conservative! I dare anyone to listen to this video and then try to show how any other Republican candidate is MORE conservative than Fred Thompson! Fred Thompson is the man we need in the White House! GO FRED!

http://www.blogsforfredthompson.com/fred-neil-cavuto-says-huckabee-practically-wanted-sanctuary-state

http://www.blogsforfredthompson.com/msnbc-fred-thompson-addresses-post-iow


86 posted on 01/04/2008 7:09:05 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

I’m always willing to share the good news about Fred.


87 posted on 01/04/2008 7:11:04 PM PST by brothers4thID (Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Route66

Wonder if Mary Cheney’s been to Wyoming? Remember early on how she came out for Fred?

Also, I’d love to see someone like Ed Gillespie join Fred’s team. He needs a campaign manager who can shake things up a bit and get the mojo going a bit faster.


88 posted on 01/04/2008 7:14:38 PM PST by freedom4me (Courage is fear holding on a minute longer. --Gen. George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID
I appreciate it, and have respect for your candidate and his views. That said, I'm not sure that posting passes this particular test. Contrast with this, noting primary sponsor.

Other concerns about your candidate: globalism vs. American sovereignty and the related issue of a China with obvious military ambitions, positive work for immigration reform (like this), and campaign finance reform. I understand the enthusiasm for a candidate with a presence on the silver screen but do sense, in observing the evolution of opinion over the last eight months, that some have taken that fame and tried to mold a Fred in their own image. I pray that, if you are successful, you are not ultimately disappointed.

Please do not place me in the category of "basher" since I have striven for a reputation of respectfulness. Again, thank you for the information.

89 posted on 01/04/2008 7:24:59 PM PST by Lexinom (Build the fence and call China to account. GoHunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
Well it might not be fair to judge Fred on his lack of support for that bill since it wasn’t before the Senate when he was a Senator, but I think I understand the point you are trying to make. My point, however, is that Fred not only voted his conscience but he also spoke about it on numerous occasions.

I cannot spend the time right now to enumerate Fred’s positions on each of the issues you listed, but I encourage you to visit www.Fred08.com and read “Fred on the issues”. That might give you a few answers.

In conclusion, I appreciate your candor and genuine engagement in civil discussion. It’s nice to be able to have an adult discussion occasionally, eh?

90 posted on 01/04/2008 7:30:50 PM PST by brothers4thID (Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
You are right. JERI is a very articulate and bright woman. FRED should have no reason to put her out front in certain areas. JERI will make a beautiful and gracious First Lady!

FRED THOMPSON is the ONLY true Conservative with a magnificent opportunity to WIN the White House for WE THE PEOPLE!

91 posted on 01/04/2008 7:33:16 PM PST by Bobbisox (ALL AMERICAN FredHead FREEPER! [FRED THOMPSON will make an amazing Commander in Chief!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

There’s a youtube video from 1994 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5a_Fpu_8KE that refutes any support for abortion - see number 30 for an explanation about the form.

The Senator does not believe in abortion, but sees a different approach to ending it - as coming from the States, after Roe v. Wade is overturned..

After Roe is overturned States will have to address abortion as they already do in the case of other cases of humans killing humans: decide between criminal and non-criminal. Neighboring States may have different definitions of First Degree murder and manslaughter. They have different laws about home defense and deaths and injuries from protecting life and property.

The States will have to consider those who hold firmly to the “rape and incest” exceptions and the cases where there is a risk to health, but not to life. They will have to satisfy the people who weren’t happy with South Dakota’s ban on abortion because it had these exceptions and allowed the morning after pill. They will also have to decide how to handle in vitro fertilization and the embryos created outside the body.


92 posted on 01/04/2008 7:33:25 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

Sure, you’re trying to be “respectful” by denigrating our support for Thompson as “enthusiasm for a candidate with a presence on the silver screen.”


93 posted on 01/04/2008 7:36:05 PM PST by Politicalmom (Huckabee’s foreign policy experience consists of eating at the International House of Pancakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

Mary Cheney doesn’t support FRed.


94 posted on 01/04/2008 7:37:33 PM PST by Politicalmom (Huckabee’s foreign policy experience consists of eating at the International House of Pancakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Jay777; motoman; mgist; gpapa; roughman; Not gonna take it anymore; GOP Poet; Apparatchik; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

95 posted on 01/04/2008 7:37:45 PM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

From Senator Thompson’s senate website:

“(Senator Thompson does not) believe that the United States should cede any of our sovereign rights as a nation to multilateral institutions. At no time should international institutions be given the authority to tax American citizens, control U.S. soldiers outside our chain of command, prosecute Americans soldiers and citizens, or make laws governing the American people.

Senator Thompson believes our adherence to these principles and priorities will ensure that the United States remains free, strong, and prosperous — a beacon of hope and model for all, and the undisputed leader of the free world.

****

April 11, 2001
SENATOR THOMPSON’S STATEMENT ON FUTURE OF U.S. RELATIONSHIP WITH CHINA

Washington, DC - U.S. Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) today issued the following statement regarding the future of the United States’ relationship with the Peoples’ Republic of China in light of their detention of 24 U.S. servicemen and women for 11 days:

“Hopefully, this will cause us to step back and take a realistic look at our relationship with China in a way that should have been done before this incident.

“Our policies in the past have led the Chinese to believe that we are so dependent on our trade relationship that there are no consequences for their bad behavior.

“Clearly, there has to be consequences for their unlawful detaining of our crew and for such things as their continued proliferation activities. Their actions are making the world a more dangerous place.

“And we have to look at our export policies. The Senate is going to be debating the Export Administration Act, which involves sensitive high tech equipment going to China. That’s going to be a contentious debate. It’s about balancing trade and national security.”

http://web.archive.org/web/20020822205408/thompson.senate.gov/press/2001/releases/pr041101.html

****

Senator Thompson believes that the United States has a unique role in the world given our economic prosperity, military power, and the strength of our principles, democratic ideals, and values. He believes the United States should be active in promoting the concepts of free trade and open markets, holding other countries responsible for their actions and affairs, yet acting firmly and clearly where our national interests and values are at stake.

As Chairman of the Governmental Affairs Committee, Senator Thompson held more than a dozen hearings on important national security issues, including the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons) and missile technology and the relaxation of export controls and sensitive “dual use” items.

Last year, he introduced the China Nonproliferation Act, which confronts proliferation by “key supplier” countries like China and Russia to rogue nations like Iran, Iraq, and Libya. This is a dangerous problem that threatens our nation’s security and important interests. The bill requires an annual review of these countries’ proliferation activities, establishes clear standards, reasonable penalties, adequate presidential waivers, congressional oversight, and much-needed transparency.

In September, Thompson was successful in bringing the measure to the floor during the debate on Permanent Normal Trade Status for China. The debate on the Thompson amendment provided the Senator with a valuable opportunity to bring the proliferation issue to the forefront and highlight the problem for his colleagues and the nation. In the coming year, Thompson will continue his efforts to combat the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.


96 posted on 01/04/2008 7:40:55 PM PST by Politicalmom (Huckabee’s foreign policy experience consists of eating at the International House of Pancakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID
Anyone know if there will be “live” results from Wyoming as well?

Doubt it. Media is not interested in "fly-over country". And they're certainly not interested in anything that helps Fred.

97 posted on 01/04/2008 7:41:36 PM PST by LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot ("If you don't have my army supplied, and keep it supplied, we'll eat your mules up, sir"-Gen.Sherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Actually, I think that Fred is the only REALLY pro-life candidate. Huckabee has gotten involved in stem cell stuff.


98 posted on 01/04/2008 7:42:22 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
But he did, didn’t he?

What about "unsigned" don't you understand? Any staffer could have filled out the form and sent it in.

99 posted on 01/04/2008 7:43:29 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
I do disagree with your candidate on some things, and am not afraid to say so. I am supporting military veteran and ranking House Armed Services Committee member Duncan Hunter - with my time, my money, and my voice.

I do not denigrate you for supporting Fred Thompson, but do not hesitate to question him on some matters - just as I have with Romney, Huckabee, McCain, and (especially) Giuliani. Never, to my recollection, have I referred to those other men using derogatory names, and I went out of my way to acknowledge Giuliani's stellar post-9/11 leadership even though I oppose most of what he stands for.

It is my hope that you, likewise, would show respect for those with whom you disagree (e.g. calling them "gnats").

100 posted on 01/04/2008 7:47:09 PM PST by Lexinom (Build the fence and call China to account. GoHunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson