Skip to comments.Trailing in N.H. Polling, Clinton Takes More Control of Campaign
Posted on 01/06/2008 8:50:54 PM PST by jimbo123
click here to read article
I can’t stand Hillary Clinton, but, I think that whoever the GOP nominee is, he will have an easier chance of beating Hillary than beating Obama. But, I think either of them CAN be defeated.
Seig Heil! /sarc
Let’s count the dead bodies associated with the Clintons in their rise to the White House and during their eight years in office. Not including everyone on board flight 800, there are over over 100 dead bodies on the the Clinton path through the White House. No other Presidency has killed so many people without conducting a miliatary war! Both Clintons should have been imprisoned many lifetimes over for their crimes...what does it take?????
These are comments from KOS alone in regard to OBAMA, from the last 24 hours:
Happy Talk, Hope, and Fairy Dust Dont Win Elections
You Dont Bring Kumbaya To A Gunfight
Campaign of False HopesM
Watching the Democratic Party rip its own throat out is a simple pleasure, and we ALL knew it would eventually come to this.
Gee..kind of like some here talk about Rudy.
I so agree. This is a chance to kill two birds with one stone. Of course Hillary will never go away - she'll become the new Ted Kennedy. Knowing she will never be President she would need to face reality and choose to bite the bullet and become the bulldog of the Senate for life.
Maybe Obama would be harder to beat because no matter what you think of his politics, he is many times more likeable than Hillary. But he has staked positions that are McGovernish and so loses that advantage of likeability. And ironically it will be the racists within the Dem party that will not vote for him that could very well make the difference. Not to mention if Hillary is put out to pasture she will probably be pulling strings to sabatoge Obama to open up a 2012 run and/or to at least retain their power structure unbroken that an Obama or Edwards presidency would destroy. It would possibly be where in such a scenario in 2012 that Hillary wouldn't run but would have a manchurian candidate that they would be puppetmasters of.
How long have the Manchurians been planning? The Toon is far from toast; her race has just begun. She begins with overwhelming forces.
"If we put up another RINO, its all over."
It is the time for the stalwart.
“Obama is gonna get his ass ripped. He is a lightweight contender. The lightest of all the Dems”
Seems like people said that about Jimmah too...Jimmah Cahrter
I agree ... I prefer the Breck Girl as the Democratic nominee.
And on the Republican side, Ron Paul fits that description. He’s such a sad joke.
Given her nature, I don't know how she can be any more controlling than she already is.
As another Freeper reminds us, "THE CLINTONS CHEAT>"
We are fighting not only her but her flying monkeys in government, and huge amounts of illegal campaign cash. Remember she has at this time the following scandals running:
1. Norman Hsu
2. The Chinese waiters/waitresses in New York.
The Asian Indian guy with the data based company.
4. Dickie Scruggs (under indictment).
She has mustered a formidable army to steal the election. Discounting her is a very big mistake until the jail cell door slams shut behind her.
She’s a nasty, mean woman that has surrounded herself with even meaner, nastier people like Mark Penn, Sid Vicious Blumnethal, Paul Begala, Carvile, Harold Ickes and Ann Lewis!! VILE people all.
Again to be said....she’s AMerica’s EX-WIFE!!
A Captain Queeg moment to be sure.
“In MSM spin terms, this means she wasnt responsible for recent defeats.”
As Rush would say:”right on right on”
During a December 2007 break from the Iowa Gang Obaming of Hill, Big Brown delivered the Sad Hill in her big brown and ugly pant suit to light up a meeting for her in Gilford, NH!
Then the Hill lights up the Gilford, NH Meeting with her charm and energy!
After that vivid description, I should be smart enough not to ask this, but, does anyone have a link to a video of Hillary’s “hurt my feelings” statement?
You bring up a good point. Wishing for Hillary as the D nominee because of some notion she’d be easier to beat is very risky business. Yes, she’d be easier to be beat if it were simply a matter of going head to head on issues and policies and personality. But as you rightly point out, that’s not the way they play. Republicans had better be thinking: What would Sun Tsu do?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.