Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy takes 29 seconds to open, close Senate (Happy Hour)
CNN ^ | Jan 7,2008

Posted on 01/07/2008 1:27:23 PM PST by BulletBobCo

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy took 29 seconds Monday to open and close the Senate, the latest move in a standoff with President Bush over recess appointments.

Senate Democrats are holding a series of "pro forma" sessions to stop recess appointments by President Bush.

Kennedy was the only senator in the chamber when he gaveled the session open shortly after 9 a.m. ET. Four women from the anti-war group Code Pink also were on hand.

After a clerk read a statement from Senate Pro Tempore Robert Byrd saying Kennedy would perform the duties, the Massachusetts Democrat immediately gaveled the session closed, saying the next one would occur Wednesday.

Senators are starting to trickle back to Washington from the holiday break.

Monday's event is one of a series of "pro forma" -- "for the sake of formality" -- sessions in a political scuffle between the White House and the Democratic-led Congress.

Democrats are keeping the Senate in session to block Bush from making any recess appointments. During congressional recesses, a constitutional mechanism allows the president to fill top government posts for up to one year without Senate confirmation.

Only one senator is needed to keep the Senate open.

Kennedy presided over was one of the longer sessions during the holidays. Sen. Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat, presided over one lasting 12 seconds on the final day of 2007.

During Christmas week, Sen. Jim Webb, D-Virginia, opened and gaveled the Senate to a close in 11 seconds. Webb spent 57 seconds in the chamber.

Other Democrats -- including Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Ben Cardin of Maryland and Chuck Schumer of New York -- will share the duty of presiding over the sessions this month.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; obstructionistdems; recessappointments; tedkennedy

1 posted on 01/07/2008 1:27:26 PM PST by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo
Warning - Ted Kennedy Ahead!


2 posted on 01/07/2008 1:29:00 PM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo
"Happy Hour" --> rofl
3 posted on 01/07/2008 1:29:18 PM PST by xtinct (I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

Somebody tase the old coot so Bush can make his appointments.


4 posted on 01/07/2008 1:30:23 PM PST by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

There’s got to be a procedural way to foil this charade—either involving Cheney, or having a few Pubbies in the Senate when they try this. Bush should make use of any such procedure, to put an end to these shenanigans in the future. He wouldn’t, of course. Fred Thompson, being a lawyer who is well-versed on procedure, and being a little tougher, would.


5 posted on 01/07/2008 1:33:02 PM PST by Defiant (Huckabee puts the goober back in gubernatorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

How long would YOU want to be alone in a room with four women from Code Pink?


6 posted on 01/07/2008 1:33:23 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Not even a drunken Kennedy?(as if there’s any other kind)


7 posted on 01/07/2008 1:35:58 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

The Democrats always start clever little procedures that somehow usually come back to bite them in the rear. This is another in a long list of matters that they will not appreciate when the shoe is on the other foot.


8 posted on 01/07/2008 1:36:21 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

This nonsense needs to be challenged. The power of recess appointments is important.

The way to challenge it is to wait for a politically “bulletproof” nominee, in a high-priority position. (Think of something like Secretary of DHS.) Just swear the new person in if Congress is not in session, “even if” it is holding these content-free “sessions,” then let someone challenge the appointment in federal court.

I want to see a federal court say that a “session” can consist of a 24-second statement indicating that the “session” is over, and nothing else.


9 posted on 01/07/2008 1:38:18 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo
This isn't a stand off ... it's a stake out.

The Senate needs to be sanitized.

They think they're the national police and .... wait a minute !

What am I saying?

National Police?

Almost rhymes with ....

10 posted on 01/07/2008 1:40:23 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

The GOP isn’t willing to put up a fight so I guess this must not be all that important.


11 posted on 01/07/2008 1:40:49 PM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

When do these folks actually work?


12 posted on 01/07/2008 1:42:48 PM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

What goes around, comes around. Just ask the hapless dingy.


13 posted on 01/07/2008 1:43:12 PM PST by Tarpon (Ignorance, the most expensive commodity produced by mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

Some republicans should show up and ask for a quorum call. or move for taxes to be cut in half and to then vote on it.


14 posted on 01/07/2008 1:49:53 PM PST by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

can’t a few pubbies with cahones immediatle address the chair and start a filibuster?

kepe the place open 24/7 until the dimmies cave.

And not one of those foolish filibusters where they open, ask him if they are still filibustering and then leave... A real stand up and read the phone book and repeat as needed type of filibuster. With the quorum calls, naturally.


15 posted on 01/07/2008 1:55:28 PM PST by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo
Ah! I see Teddy was having a drink with all of his friends! Apparently, he toasted himself.
16 posted on 01/07/2008 1:56:59 PM PST by Bushbacker1 (Officially Fredbacker1 but don't know how to change my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: BulletBobCo; Congressman Billybob

Maybe someone already answered this, but what would happen if a republican senator suggested the lack of a quorum? Couldn’t they then ‘compel’ the senators to return?


18 posted on 01/07/2008 2:03:53 PM PST by Bush_Democrat (Ex-Dem since 2001 *Folding@Home for the Gipper - Join the FReeper Folders*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

About as long as one can hold their breath............


19 posted on 01/07/2008 2:05:01 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kempster

Kennedy probably believes that he just did.


20 posted on 01/07/2008 2:07:15 PM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
I don't think our people should have to suffer through a filibuster just because these bozos want to pull a stunt. If we could propose legislation that would force them to issue a quorum call, that would be fine. Keep it up and force them to recess the senate so we can't keep bringing up proposals. I don't know what's possible, I am just presuming that there is something that can be done, if, as you say, someone has cajones.

Perhaps Bush doesn't have any recess appointments he wants to make, so he isn't worried about this stunt. That would be the charitable way to look at his inaction. However, this could lead to a custom that prevents recess appointments from ever being made, and thus circumvents a presidential power that is in the Constitution.

21 posted on 01/07/2008 2:13:56 PM PST by Defiant (Huckabee puts the goober back in gubernatorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

Poor Old Joe Kennedy — it would have killed him to know that the mental runt of the litter — the really stupid one was the only one to survive....


22 posted on 01/07/2008 2:18:29 PM PST by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo
Probably too late but if McCain wanted to score some points, he should appear in the Senate chamber along with a few other Republican colleagues and scare the bejeebers out of the poor RAT sap that had the duty. Can you imagine the panicked phone calls to Harry? Instead, the RAT stunt is allowed to play out unopposed. Not a goldarned backbone in sight. Disgusting. The RNC and the Senatorial campaign can kiss my arse if they think they will get any contributions from me and mine.
23 posted on 01/07/2008 2:28:02 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("Hillary ... a product whose sell-by date has passed" (OMG, I'm quoting Shrum))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

“Poor Old Joe Kennedy — it would have killed him to know that the mental runt of the litter — the really stupid one was the only one to survive....”

OH...I’m guessin’ he’s aware of the situation; wherever he may be...


24 posted on 01/07/2008 3:07:08 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Since Teddy is the chairperson, I assume you could have a Republican ask for the floor and percede to talk for 12+ hours thus forcing the dems to stay there.


25 posted on 01/07/2008 3:08:54 PM PST by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

Once the Senate is closed, why can’t but appoint? Is there a minimum time that the Senate can’t be in session to appoint recess appointed judges?


26 posted on 01/07/2008 3:11:10 PM PST by Bommer ("He that controls the spice controls the universe!" (unfortunately that spice is Nutmeg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

See how pointless it is to campaign on ‘uniting’ America?? There is no more a chance of ‘uniting’ people like these democrats than there is of ‘negotiating’ with Al Qaeda or Hamas.

But that won’t stop democrats from getting all wet when their candidates talk about ‘bringing us all together’ (under liberalism).


27 posted on 01/07/2008 3:52:56 PM PST by bpjam (Harry Reid doesn't even have 32% of my approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odin219

Oh my, that’s hilarious.


28 posted on 01/07/2008 7:48:20 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson