Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bpjam

my first thought exactly..the article states the two networks aren’t “completely connected”, but a saavy hacker doesn’t need a complete connection, only a tidbit to get him/her where they want to go. whoever designed this should be redeployed..


5 posted on 01/07/2008 1:37:03 PM PST by GeorgiaDawg32 (If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always gotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GeorgiaDawg32
...a saavy hacker doesn’t need a complete connection, only a tidbit to get him/her where they want to go.

People who don't understand computers imagine that hackers can do the impossible. When someone takes control of another computer through a network, they aren't really applying control remotely, they are simply taking advantage of that computer's willingness to volunteer that control.

These holes in security are provided intentionally by the makers of the computer systems being attacked. Microsoft wants it to be easy to modify software, within PCs, from a remote location.

An aircraft's flight control network has a completely different architecture, than a Windows network. It is safe to assume that the two are connected through a proprietary device that converts data between the two networks, but cannot create control signals on the flight control network.

Boeing can make it so that it is no easier for a hacker to gain control of the flight control systems from a passenger seat, than it is to gain control of the power lines through my ADSL CODEC.

22 posted on 01/07/2008 3:38:17 PM PST by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson