Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul, get out of the Republican Party.
Modern Conservative ^ | Christopher Cook

Posted on 01/09/2008 8:54:49 AM PST by connell

Leave. Just go.

Mr. Paul, you are NOT a Republican. You may have views that intersect with some aspects of the Republican platform. That does NOT make you a Republican.

The Republican Party is a big tent movement. We don't apply nearly the same strictness when it comes to tests of ideological purity as the Democrats do, but we still have some standards. And you, sir, do not even come close to meeting them.

People who blame America for the acts of war made against it are not Republicans.

People who think that we blew up our own buildings on 9/11...or who hint that we might have...or who attract the support of people with such beliefs...are not Republicans.

People who may be receiving secret funding from George Soros...and who certainly receive energy and succor from radical leftists...are not Republicans.

People who have become the darling of, and the recipient of support from, America's neo-Nazis and white supremacists---and who refuse to openly repudiate that support---are not Republicans.

And people who publish racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-American newsletters...are not Republicans.

Oh, and your protestations of innocence regarding this racist, anti-Semitic, anti-American newsletter to which you attached your name are absurd. As Jonah Goldberg said yesterday on the Michael Medved show, if...

(Excerpt) Read more at modernconservative.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; gop; keepowt; ronpaul; ronpaulnewsletter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 451-484 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2008 8:54:53 AM PST by connell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson; ejonesie22; lormand; AuntB; Allegra

ping


2 posted on 01/09/2008 8:56:03 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Oh, and your protestations of innocence regarding this racist, anti-Semitic, anti-American newsletter to which you attached your name are absurd. As Jonah Goldberg said yesterday on the Michael Medved show, if it had been one or two issues, and then you closed down the newsletter, that would be acceptable. Letting it go on for two decades is not.
3 posted on 01/09/2008 8:56:28 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: connell

Now, send the same message to Rudy, Romney, Huckster, and McInsane.


4 posted on 01/09/2008 8:57:20 AM PST by NavVet (If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primary, you won't have it to defend in the General Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connell

I am not a Paul fan at all, but if he is supposed to leave, could he take most of our other candidates and drop them off a RAT headquarters?


5 posted on 01/09/2008 8:57:22 AM PST by indylindy (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Its about time this stuff was made public in forums like this.


6 posted on 01/09/2008 8:57:23 AM PST by Badeye (No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

You beat me with the same thought. LOL


7 posted on 01/09/2008 8:58:16 AM PST by indylindy (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: connell
I just read one person’s comment that was very interesting. How come, if these comments were written by a ‘ghost writer’ who was fired for making those statements, was a retraction, correction or disavowment not printed in a later newsletter?
8 posted on 01/09/2008 8:58:29 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connell

What a dumb article.

I guess pro-abortionists and gun grabbers are A-OK with this dope.


9 posted on 01/09/2008 8:58:33 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

whats sad is that this traitor just beat Fred Thompson by almost 10pts in New Hampshire


10 posted on 01/09/2008 8:58:33 AM PST by italianquaker (Is there anything Ron Paul doesn't blame the USA for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
whats sad is that this traitor just beat Fred Thompson by almost 10pts in New Hampshire

No, what is sad is that Christian socialists and Democrats running as Republicans beat Thompson.
11 posted on 01/09/2008 9:00:57 AM PST by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

Was it incorrect?
Just wondering.


12 posted on 01/09/2008 9:01:09 AM PST by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Naturally, the PaulBots will be in complete denial. It doesn’t matter where the material comes from, no one has the right to criticize Ron Paul except Ron Paul. Anyone else is a liberal, a socialist, a neo-conservative, whatever name they find handy at the time.

Frankly, this is why I agreed with you yesterday that we should not be zotting PaulBots out of hand. The more they show themselves for what they are, the more honest FReepers will see just what motivates them.


13 posted on 01/09/2008 9:01:10 AM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

In a liberal state that Thompson didn’t even campaign in? Might as well ask how Paul will do against Thompson in San Francisco. Not worried. Let’s wait until Super Tuesday and see how that plays out.


14 posted on 01/09/2008 9:02:28 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

What a dumb response. The article write is right on. Ron Paul is no republican, and those who support him can leave too.


15 posted on 01/09/2008 9:02:32 AM PST by HoustonTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: connell

Yeah, but where’s Ron Paul gonna go? Does the Klan still have its own political party?


16 posted on 01/09/2008 9:07:18 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Fred Head and proud of it! Fear the Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connell

Besides Hunter, Paul is the only GOP candidate that is not sitting down and partying with Soros.


17 posted on 01/09/2008 9:07:32 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (And close the damned borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connell

Who said mcCain is !


18 posted on 01/09/2008 9:07:35 AM PST by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Be careful of what you ask for. An independent run by Ron Paul in 08 could sink the GOP nominee.


19 posted on 01/09/2008 9:08:11 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tfecw
No, what is sad is that Christian socialists and Democrats running as Republicans beat Thompson.

Not as sad as unrealistic hopes being pinned on candidates with zero charisma and long past their prime who obviously don't have a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected. (Remember Bob Dole?)

20 posted on 01/09/2008 9:09:23 AM PST by arturo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HoustonTech

If Rudy McRomnabee is what passes for republican, I’d say the GOP has left us.


21 posted on 01/09/2008 9:09:36 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (And close the damned borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: connell
Ron Paul, get out of the Republican Party.

Yes, get out, damn you! You're reminding the Republicans that they have forgotten all about conserving the Constitution. They can't hear that treasonous talk because they've got big spending plans ahead! There are evangelical votes to buy with promises of a new Inquisition, and redneck yahoos to impress by buying ten new aircraft carriers and talking "tough on terror!"

(But just make sure you don't dare to notice that they really don't take terrorism seriously at all, because they've left the back door open to terrorists and anybody else who wants to walk right in as long as there is some chance they will help keep the consumer economy afloat...)

So enough of this Constitutionalist garbage, Ron Paul! We can't afford freedom right now, because EastAsia has sworn to destroy us! So just get out! ;)

22 posted on 01/09/2008 9:10:37 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connell

Quality of posting on the FR decreasing rapidly. A pity...


23 posted on 01/09/2008 9:11:31 AM PST by Lukasz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connell

Sorry, disagree. If you really believe we should have smaller government, you can’t support anyone else in this GOP primary but Ron Paul. I don’t agree with him on everything. I never will, but at least I know he won’t sell out his principles for cheap political gain like some front running Republicans in the race. I noticed he beat this websites’ two darlings yesterday, Fred Thompson & Duncan Hunter like a drum. It wasn’t even close. He almost beat Rudy as well.


24 posted on 01/09/2008 9:11:32 AM PST by Allan Bartlett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
That has to be one of the funniest things I've heard yet, the anti war sorors loving nuts love Paul. Hell, look at who is showing up at his rallies.
Cindy Sheehan and Stormfront Leader Jamie Kelso at a Paul Rally in Ft. Worth.

Heck, a lot of folks wonder how much Soros money is going to paul's big fundraisers.

25 posted on 01/09/2008 9:11:40 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: connell
>>>>>>People who may be receiving secret funding from George Soros...and who certainly receive energy and succor from radical leftists...are not Republicans.<<<<<<

Ron Paul can be accused of many things, but accusing him of receinving funding from Soros is dead wrong. He is an enemy of Soros and his agents, as well an enemy of those who hire Soros for dirty jobs.

26 posted on 01/09/2008 9:11:52 AM PST by DTA (Advice to Condi: when you are in a hole, stop digging)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

Just the other day I noticed posters in this forum stating that they wished all of Paul, Hunter & Keyes supporters would leave the party. One guy even said that Paul supporters were a cancer upon the GOP that needed to be cut out.

Of course in a few months these same posters will be telling everyone that we need every vote that we can get. That you must hold our nose and vote for Giuliani or you are delivering us to Hillary.


27 posted on 01/09/2008 9:11:54 AM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: connell

Paul adheres to more republican issues than several of the other candidates.


28 posted on 01/09/2008 9:13:03 AM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavVet; connell
Now, send the same message to Rudy, Romney, Huckster, and McInsane.

I'm sure that was a mere oversight.

29 posted on 01/09/2008 9:13:16 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

David Duke ran on the platform of limited government and returning to Constitutional values, heck, he even disavowed racism, but didn’t mean the Republicna party had to accept him. If Paul was only about Constitutional values and limited government, we wouldn’t have a problem with him.

Remember, Fred Phelps talks about the bible and Christianity all the time, doesn’t mean you want him at your church.


30 posted on 01/09/2008 9:13:51 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tfecw

maybe


31 posted on 01/09/2008 9:13:54 AM PST by italianquaker (Is there anything Ron Paul doesn't blame the USA for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

I don’t think so. Here in Boulder, there are ron Paul signs and stickers everywhere. The primaries are full of saboteurs and “activists” that are pushing this fruitcake as a viable contender. The truth is plain to see - republicans will not vote for this clown nor should they allow him as part of the party. Would they let David Duke up onstage at a republican debate? Do they have to include RuPaul?

Note fReepers there are many saboteurs within the FR pages. See who they are most afraid of - Mitt Romney, Hunter, Thompson, McCain. Those are the candidates that would smash Hillary/Obama. They are all good candidates. The Dem candidates are all talentless unaccomplished hacks.


32 posted on 01/09/2008 9:14:11 AM PST by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

He cannot really do any worse


33 posted on 01/09/2008 9:15:22 AM PST by italianquaker (Is there anything Ron Paul doesn't blame the USA for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

Oh, please. What self-indulgent tripe.


34 posted on 01/09/2008 9:17:29 AM PST by PeterFinn (A muslim in the White House would be an Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
How come, if these comments were written by a ‘ghost writer’ who was fired for making those statements...

Here is the context of Ron Paul's rejection of the New Republic expose taken directly from Paul's site':

"January 8, 2008 5:28 am EST

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – In response to an article published by The New Republic, Ron Paul issued the following statement:

“The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.

“In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person's character, not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: ‘I rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.’

“This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It's once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.

“When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.”

Nowhere in this statement does Paul indicate the writer was fired. I wonder where the above poster got his material. In fact, judging by the above denial, Paul would/should have no executive authority to fire anyone under the circumstances as stated. The whole implication being that whoever did this did so beyond the scope of Paul's control.

35 posted on 01/09/2008 9:18:01 AM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Which is exactly what the Dim’s are hoping for by feeding Run Paul’s campaign with Soros’ money.


36 posted on 01/09/2008 9:18:19 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triagle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
My perception is that Ron Paul is being run out of the Republican Party precisely because of his belief in limited government - the peripheral issues are just excuses. Many Republicans talk favorably about limiting government, but when they realize that in doing so they will lose the chance to control (or make war upon) people whose beliefs they don't like, all of a sudden they turn their backs on the idea and shun the one who proposed it.
37 posted on 01/09/2008 9:18:20 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

“If Paul was only about Constitutional values and limited government, we wouldn’t have a problem with him.”

Put down your pipe. I’ve seen enough of your posts to know that regardless of “anything whatsoever”, you would oppose him.


38 posted on 01/09/2008 9:18:30 AM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pissant

PAUL WANTS TO DESTROY OUR MILITARY - HOW IS THAT A REPUBLICAN ISSUE?


39 posted on 01/09/2008 9:20:12 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triagle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: connell

I agree. Time for Paul and any other, not a real Republican, candidate to get out of the party. And take your followers with you. Of course that would mean the Republicans wouldn’t have the chance of a snowball in Hell winning an election but, what the heck. At least the party would be pure.


40 posted on 01/09/2008 9:20:45 AM PST by Vigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Yeah, but where’s Ron Paul gonna go?

Maybe they should start a Moonbat Party. Paul and Kucinich could fight it out for the '08 nomination.

41 posted on 01/09/2008 9:20:53 AM PST by Allegra (AACCK! Back in Iraq...how'd that happen so fast??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Exactly.

If Paul supporters had any sense they would have realized a long time ago that if they REALLY wanted smaller government and federalism than Thompson was the man. Who knows maybe some of those supporters will wise up, but I won’t be holding my breath. The one’s I’ve talked to are still defending the guy...unbelievable!


42 posted on 01/09/2008 9:21:14 AM PST by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jrd

McCain is problematic, for sure. His voting record is mostly conservative, but he has stabbed conservatives and the GOP in the back several times. Factor his voting record (83 lifetime ACU rating) with his annoying “maverick” behaviors, and you still get someone who occupies far more of the GOP’s ideological space than Ron Paul ever will. Paul has the small government thing going for him, but that’s about it. I’d rather have Thompson, but I’d take McCain over Paul any day.


43 posted on 01/09/2008 9:21:52 AM PST by connell (I will not cease from mental fight, nor shall my sword sleep in my hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
Now, send the same message to Rudy, Romney, Huckster, and McInsane.

Seriously. Paul is closer to the Republican platform than these four and 90% of the idiots we have in Congress.

44 posted on 01/09/2008 9:22:07 AM PST by Texas Federalist (Taxes get so depressed when they hear Fred Thompson is in charge that they cut themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: connell

Perhaps the leading candidates could echo this brilliant post. If Paul is so repugnant they should come out explicitly against Paul’s and his supporter’s racism against minorities and seek to bounce Paul and his 10% out of the party. Those few thousand won’t be missed and think of the millions who will look to the GOP as the true saviors of America. Just an idea, maybe you could e-mail your post to the campaigns.


45 posted on 01/09/2008 9:22:12 AM PST by junta (It's Poltical Correctness stupid! Hold liberals accountable for their actions, a new idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilance

What about Giuliani, Spectre & Snowe?


46 posted on 01/09/2008 9:22:26 AM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

A lot of folks wonder how much Soros money is going to his pals McCain, Rudy, Romney, Huckabee and Thompson.

They’re all in the club with him.


47 posted on 01/09/2008 9:22:38 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (And close the damned borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The Grand Klegal (sp?) is a CommieCrat from West Virginia.

Does the Klan still have its own political party?

48 posted on 01/09/2008 9:22:48 AM PST by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: connell

I second that. Get out, Paul!


49 posted on 01/09/2008 9:23:04 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

As much as I disagree with the Rudy McRomnabee’s of the GOP they are far better men than Ron Paul is. At least they don’t draw most of their support from neo-Nazis and other hate groups. If I thought Ron Paul represented what the GOP ought to be, I’d leave the party. Even the Democrats would give us a better president than Ron Paul.


50 posted on 01/09/2008 9:24:38 AM PST by HoustonTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 451-484 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson