Reuters! ..go figure.
Either way I will p*ss on his grave if I was walking by no matter what they call him.
OCTOBER 21, 2003 : (PLAMENAMGAME/NIGERFLAP - PHILIP AGEE, LYNDON LAROUCHE) The “scandal” over the naming of a CIA agent demonstrates the enormous liberal bias of the major media. The liberals were not concerned when pro-communist activists were naming CIA agents for the purpose of destroying secret operations against the Soviet Union and its client states. In fact, journalists relied on people such as CIA defector Philip Agee, who specialized in naming the names of CIA operatives, for stories. The federal law that prohibits the naming of agents under cover was passed in response to the activities of Agee and his associates.
Today, however, it has become a major controversy that one or two Bush administration officials have named a CIA employee to a respected conservative journalist, Robert Novak, who published the information. What those officials were doing, in their conversation with Novak, is far different than anything that Agee and his media collaborators ever did.
Incredibly, Agee, who wrote the book “Inside the Company: CIA Diary,” has come to the defense of Joe Wilson, whose wifes employment by the CIA was revealed by Novak. Agee now runs a travel services business inof all placesHavana, Cuba. Agee calls the outing of Ambassador Joseph Wilsons wife “dirty politics.”
The affair is depicted as an attempt by the administration to take revenge on Ambassador Joseph Wilson for opposing Iraq policy. But the name of his wife was provided in the context of the administration trying to explain why Wilson was picked by the CIA to conduct a mission to investigate the Iraq/uranium matter. This is a potential conflict of interest with a possible partisan motivation. Whats more, as Internet writer Darren Kaplan points out, such a selection might violate the federal anti-nepotism statute, which prohibits federal employees from even recommending the appointment of family members for jobs. The real story, the Wall Street Journal reports, is whether a group of CIA bureaucrats is “hoping to defeat” Bush by undermining his foreign policy and whether the Wilson mission was part of that effort.
A group calling itself Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, representing former CIA employees, has fanned the flames of this controversy. But its spokesman, Ray McGovern, has some explaining of his own to do. He admits that he has given permission to reprint his articles critical of the Bush administration to publications associated with Lyndon LaRouche. McGovern, who had a 27-year career in the CIA, says researchers for LaRouche “do some fairly good work” and he sees “no downside” to them using his material. He claims to know nothing about LaRouche.
Thats hard to believe. Larouche is running for the Democratic presidential nomination, again, and served time in prison on financial fraud charges. He has said that Bush and Cheney should be declared insane. Back in 1976, LaRouche called for bringing into being “a new Marxist International throughout the capitalist sector” and, before the first Persian Gulf War, he issued a statement calling for support for Iraq.——— “CIA Defector Defends Joe Wilson,” By Cliff Kincaid , AIM Report, October 21, 2003
Guess they think the Soviets were good guys. Good grief!