Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In 1996, Paul Wasn't Issuing Denials
Captain's Quarters ^ | Jan. 11, 2008 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 01/11/2008 6:59:44 AM PST by jdm

Reason Magazine has long associated themselves with the Ron Paul campaign, if not officially endorsing him. Their Hit & Run blog has served as the heart of rational Paul apologetics, and in their skilled hands, that has proven essential to his campaign. Now, as the magazine has Paul on its cover, its new editor has the unpleasant task of looking a little more closely at the candidate, and Matt Welch finds it an unpleasant journey.

Has Paul really disassociated himself from, and "taken moral responsibility" for, these "Ron Paul" newsletters "for over a decade"? If he has, that history has not been recorded by the Nexis database, as best as I can reckon.

The first indication I could find of Paul either expressing remorse about the statements or claiming that he did not author them came in an October 2001 Texas Monthly article -- less than eight years ago. ...

So what exactly did Paul and his campaign say about these and more egregious statements during his contentious 1996 campaign for Congress, when Democrat Lefty Morris made the newsletters a constant issue? Besides complaining that the quotes were taken "out of context" and proof of his opponent's "race-baiting," Paul and his campaign defended and took full ownership of the comments.

Indeed. Rather than claiming he had never read these newsletters, as Paul absurdly did on CNN last night, Paul claimed that he himself wrote the newsletters. Matt Welch find this in the contemporaneous Dallas Morning News report on the newsletters during Paul's 1996 Congressional campaign (May 22, 1996, emphasis mine):

Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns. He said they should be read and quoted in their entirety to avoid misrepresentation. [...]

In the interview, he did not deny he made the statement about the swiftness of black men.

"If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them," Dr. Paul said.

Matt has more examples of Paul's non-denials in 1996. Twelve years later, Paul wants people to believe that not only did he not write any of his newsletters, he never read them either. His role in the single most effective piece of outreach of his organization, he explained to Wolf Blitzer last night, was as a publisher -- one who didn't bother to read his own publication. These 1996 quotes put lie to his CNN interview answers.

Not only does this show dishonesty, but it indicates that Paul had a lot more involvement in the publication of the despicable statements found in his own newsletter than Paul or his less-rational apologists want to admit. The supremacists and conspiracy theorists surrounding his campaign apparently got attracted by more than just Paul's views on the Constitution; they read the newsletters and determined that Paul was one of them. His refusal to recant in 1996 and his explanation that he can't recall ever reading the newsletters today signal to them that he still wants their support.

People wonder why this matters, given Paul's fringe appeal. It matters because we can't allow this kind of hatred to get legitimized in mainstream politics again. This kind of rhetoric used to be mainstream, and not just in the South, either. Republicans cannot allow the party to get tainted by the stench of racism and conspiracy mongering. If enough of us don't step up and denounce it, strongly and repeatedly, we will not be able to avoid it.

Matt Welch and the people at Reason have reached that same conclusion in regards to libertarianism and their magazine. Good for them, even if it came a little late.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1996; denials; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-447 next last
To: jmc813
Hello? Are we on the same page here? The GOP needs to DISTANCE THEMSELVES FROM PAUL. And they can do so.

Personally, the NH GOP is a bunch of mouth-breathing good-ol-boys who learned nothing from the ass-kicking they took in 2006. RINOs, the whole lot of them.
51 posted on 01/11/2008 7:45:39 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Thus far the media hasn't characterized him as a Republican

There was this Republican debate thingie last night, and granted I was two glasses of merlot deep at the time, but I could have sworn Ron Paul was on my TV screen. Maybe I was just f$%&ed up. Who knows?

52 posted on 01/11/2008 7:46:54 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
BTW, the torture of McCain started around the same time that Ron Paul was sitting around in an air-conditioned National Guard examination room doing things he didn't believe in in exchange for cash.

Which branch of the military did you serve in?

53 posted on 01/11/2008 7:48:07 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Ron Paul has never accomplished jack-shit in his long career of living off taxpayers.

His moment of glory is betraying his country, and taking bloodmoney of the back of our troops, from seditionists, traitors and racists.

He can go to hell.

54 posted on 01/11/2008 7:48:24 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Not to mention the fact I've hear Paul described as a "maverick Republican" or other such tripe more than once on my television.

Maybe it was just an auditory hallucination. A repeating one, at that.
55 posted on 01/11/2008 7:49:02 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

I must admit, you’re very good at calmly pwning the Posse wannabes on these threads. Well done.


56 posted on 01/11/2008 7:50:05 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
Hello? Are we on the same page here? The GOP needs to DISTANCE THEMSELVES FROM PAUL. And they can do so.

Would you also agree that the GOP needs too distance itself from gun-grabbers and pro-abortion Republicans?

57 posted on 01/11/2008 7:51:50 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
His campaign was marred buy violence of his supporters, he called the US the “Great Satan,” and he urged his supporters to “necklace” his opponents. This was in 1991. I guess namecalling is easier than researching.

Apparently "researching" to you means reading the columns of gay activist/Ron Paul supporter/Milosevic apologist Justin Raimondo.

The reports of necklacing came from the 1996 split between the OPL party and Aristide's Lavalas faction, when there was open violence in the streets between Aristide supporters and his former allies.

But keep digging.

back to the topic of the thread:

Ron Paul is a lying weasel, as demonstrated by the libertarian Reason Magazine's inability to justify his continuously changing story about his whacko newsletter.

58 posted on 01/11/2008 7:52:25 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
It's not as if he had a good excuse for that kind of language, like having a newsletter for example.

So you think its okay to call the Vietnamese Gooks (still not fully apologized for), but not okay for Paul who unlike McCain, has fully apologize for his newsletters, eh? McCain can be a racist and that's okay with you.

59 posted on 01/11/2008 7:53:47 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

A freeper defending Aristide. Imagine that. Next, you’ll be defending Chavez and Castro (both of whom your pal Aristide admires).


60 posted on 01/11/2008 7:55:18 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Ron Paul has never accomplished jack-[CENSORED] in his long career of living off taxpayers.

I've gotta say, watching the meltdown of the Giulianites as he continues to fade into oblivion warms the cockles of my heart. I might have to stop over at one of the FR exile sites today for a good laugh.

61 posted on 01/11/2008 7:55:34 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

“Actually, Thompson was much like a Ron Paul supporter in one respect: he was taken in by the rhetoric of a scummy charlatan who claimed to be a man of principle.”

On Oct 10th 1991 Thompson filed papers lobbying for Aristide
http://conservativesagainstfred.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/ppm43_thompson-doc2.pdf

2 weeks EARLIER -On Sept 27th - 1991 Aristide endorsed ‘necklacing’

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={E4D5ADDB-07EB-45F4-968E-965ADD70E6E2}

FrontPageMagazine.com | Friday, February 20, 2004

ONCE AGAIN HAITIAN PRESIDENT JOHN-BERTRAND ARISTIDE
may be ousted by his citizens, who began a new rebellion against his tyrannical rule on February 5.

After Aristide was removed by a military coup in 1991, President Bill Clinton in 1994 sent 20,000 U.S. troops to Haiti to restore to power this former Roman Catholic Priest and advocate for Leftist Liberation Theology who once called Cuban Marxist dictator Fidel Castro his “greatest personal hero.”

(snip)

Aristide has also endorsed “necklacing” of the kind widely practiced in South Africa by Winnie Mandela. It consists of seizing a victim, forcing an automobile tire filled with gasoline down over their head and shoulders, and then setting the tire and gasoline on fire.

“What a beautiful tool!… It smells good. And wherever you go, you want to smell it,” Aristide said of the necklacing of his critics on September 27, 1991, as witnessed and reported by Associated Press.


62 posted on 01/11/2008 7:56:03 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem; Captain Kirk

Didn’t your mother teach you personal responsibility? The excuse that “Jimmy did it too” doesn’t fly with me.

And I think there is a qualitative difference between making a mistake about a foreign country’s politics and tin-pot politicians and a US politician personally holding morally repugnant racist attitudes.

I too like a lot of the things Paul says (Lets get rid of the IRS! Yay!)

But anyone can find and mouth a few libertarian ideas that will appeal to me. But I don’t let it lead me down the path toward supporting this guy who has been known as a radical kook in Texas for years.

You should feel betrayed by him, not attack others.


63 posted on 01/11/2008 7:56:56 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
A freeper defending Aristide. Imagine that. Next, you’ll be defending Chavez and Castro (both of whom your pal Aristide admires).

There is no bottom of the barrel for the hate brigade. Blackbird.

64 posted on 01/11/2008 7:56:56 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I think I see why the Aristide issue keeps coming up, they like Marxist Military Coups. Paul seems to have taken the opposite approach to Haiti. He was the only member of Congress in September not to pass a resolution urging Haiti to conduct fair, free, and peaceful elections.


65 posted on 01/11/2008 7:57:02 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Which branch of the military did you serve in?

I have never served in the military in any capacity.

Which is immaterial to the point: Ron Paul by his own admission served in a military he did not believe in solely for the cash.

66 posted on 01/11/2008 7:57:22 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; Captain Kirk

“The reports of necklacing came from the 1996 split between the OPL party and Aristide’s Lavalas faction, when there was open violence in the streets between Aristide supporters and his former allies.”

No - 1991.

See the article I just posted to you previously.

You have gotten nearly every fact you’ve cited wrong.

I’ve posted links rebutting each one.

I am sure this will only earn more namecalling.


67 posted on 01/11/2008 7:57:52 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

Aristide and Castro have a mutual admiration society. and this was equally true in 1991.


68 posted on 01/11/2008 7:57:57 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Actually, that's a choice better left to the electorate. However, I don't think Rudy, Huckster, McCain, or Romney are racist kooks, either. I won't vote for them because of their liberal stands, but I don't think they should be thrown out of the party either.

Ron should because we as a party have to have SOME standards, sound character being one of them. Say what you want about the RINOs, but they're not embracing Stormfront on Ron Jones.

If you're angry about the support Rudy McRomney the Huck gets, don't get peeved at me, it's the voters who don't know any better. I DO know better.

And my tagline is a submariner's expression. Don't sweat it.

Oh, and apology accepted.
69 posted on 01/11/2008 7:58:02 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling; bcsco; wideawake
Just for clarification, the earlier denials relate to a single artile which surfaced in the 1996 campaign, LOS ANGELES RACIAL TERRORISM. Ironically that copy was passed around by Dan Gannon, a pretty well known white supremecist in his own regard. In the past he was accused of being the author, because he passed it around usenet. This was the only article that had surfaced, so his denial was over a single article. A problem, but believeable that a single article missed his attention.

In the interest of full disclosure, always a good thing for a politician, Paul refused to release copies of the newsletter.

Note the quick mention in a July, 2007 interview with Paul by the NYT Magazine. A fairly positive bio.

The question is whether the old ideologies being resurrected are neglected wisdom or discredited nonsense. In the 1996 general election, Paul’s Democratic opponent Lefty Morris held a press conference to air several shocking quotes from a newsletter that Paul published during his decade away from Washington. Passages described the black male population of Washington as “semi-criminal or entirely criminal” and stated that “by far the most powerful lobby in Washington of the bad sort is the Israeli government.” Morris noted that a Canadian neo-Nazi Web site had listed Paul’s newsletter as a laudably “racialist” publication.

Paul survived these revelations. He later explained that he had not written the passages himself — quite believably, since the style diverges widely from his own. But his response to the accusations was not transparent. When Morris called on him to release the rest of his newsletters, he would not. He remains touchy about it. “Even the fact that you’re asking this question infers, ‘Oh, you’re an anti-Semite,’ ” he told me in June. Actually, it doesn’t. Paul was in Congress when Israel bombed Iraq’s Osirak nuclear plant in 1981 and — unlike the United Nations and the Reagan administration — defended its right to do so. He says Saudi Arabia has an influence on Washington equal to Israel’s. His votes against support for Israel follow quite naturally from his opposition to all foreign aid. There is no sign that they reflect any special animus against the Jewish state.

As recently as June he refused to release copies, answering the request with the standard you're accusing me of being an antisemite excuse, which struck me odd at the time, since the issue was racism. Neither Jews nor Israel are mentioned in the article being questioned. Obviously Paul knew about the newsletters content, else his response would have been Even the fact that you’re asking this question infers, ‘Oh, you’re an anti-Semite racist’, based on the single racist article.

70 posted on 01/11/2008 7:58:15 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
His moment of glory is betraying his country, and taking bloodmoney of the back of our troops, from seditionists, traitors and racists.

That pretty much covers it.

71 posted on 01/11/2008 7:58:46 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Yes, he was. He would have also opposed a “free” election in Palestine which led to the victory of Hamas, an election that U.S. has now repudiated though clearly free and fair.


72 posted on 01/11/2008 7:59:14 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

Fascinating that your link does not work.


73 posted on 01/11/2008 7:59:21 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
Another pile-on thread by people who didn’t read the article...

With an equal dose of "blind defense" by those who only "read" what they wanted to in the article.

74 posted on 01/11/2008 7:59:56 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
Oh, and Ron Paul is still a lying, fraudulent scumbag who claimed to be the author of those newsletters before deciding later that he didn't write them.

That's the actual topic of the thread.

75 posted on 01/11/2008 8:00:28 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; Captain Kirk
BTW, the torture of McCain started around the same time that Ron Paul was sitting around in an air-conditioned National Guard examination room doing things he didn't believe in in exchange for cash.

Caught you in another lie.

"Dr. Paul's medical training was interrupted when he was drafted during the Cuban Missile Crisis into the United States Air Force. He served as a flight surgeon out of Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, from 1963 to 1965, attending to the ear, nose and throat problems of pilots. He remained in the military during the early years of the Vietnam War. Paul's active duty service took him to countries such as South Korea, Iran, Ethiopia and Turkey. He then served in the Air National Guard from 1965 to 1968 while completing his medical residency in Pittsburgh. He achieved rank of captain during his service in the Air Force."
76 posted on 01/11/2008 8:02:05 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Well, we right-thinking, real conservatives have always suspected he was worse than a kook since so many of his previous denials were not plausible. Now, it’s clear he’s a liar, a fraud, a demagogue, and one who currys favor with racists while he advocates that we conform our foreign policy to the wishes of al Qaeda and Iran’s mad mullahs. He’s beyond a funny fool now.
77 posted on 01/11/2008 8:02:24 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Al Qaeda: enemy of civilization and humanity. Ron Paul: al Qaeda's puppet and mouthpiece.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

“Oh, and Ron Paul is still a lying, fraudulent scumbag who claimed to be the author of those newsletters before deciding later that he didn’t write them.”

You’re the liar as I proved in post after post on this thread.


78 posted on 01/11/2008 8:02:34 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
Aristide was a committed leftist in 1991, as well, btw.

I guess namecalling is easier than researching.

I guess changing the subject is easier than defending the indefensible.

You have not made any effort to address the issue at hand. You are using the classic Democrat defense of "everybody does it..."

Pathetic.

79 posted on 01/11/2008 8:03:05 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I notice that you have backed away from your previous support of Jean Aristide as a rationalizationt to Fred’s behavior (no wrose than Paul’s) in this thread. Why?


80 posted on 01/11/2008 8:03:06 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I have never served in the military in any capacity.

One of my hugest pet-peeves is when someone who never served complains about the service of someone who did honorably, be it Paul, McCain, Bush, whomever. If a vet wants to go ahead and do so, I won't raise a peep, but for non-veterans, forget it.

Which is immaterial to the point: Ron Paul by his own admission served in a military he did not believe in solely for the cash.

He was a doctor with a private practice when he was commissioned. He certainly wasn't "moving on up" financially. And a very good portion of our guys and gals serving overseas currently enlisted due in large part for the financial benefits. Please don't smear them.

81 posted on 01/11/2008 8:04:17 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Did you hear your boy Rudy is too broke to pay his staff this month?

And what does that have to do with an article on Ron Paul's lies about the newsletters?

82 posted on 01/11/2008 8:05:08 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

What a coincidence, here I am changing a dirty diaper on my son and the first ping I see is to a Ron Paul thread...

Guess what the diaper and Paul have in common...


83 posted on 01/11/2008 8:05:34 AM PST by ejonesie22 (In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking

Who is changing the subject? Paul has apologized but others have not for their past actions. It is just pointing out a double standad. Paul screwed up big time and at least tried to make up for it. Fred and McCain didn’t even really try. If you want to raid Paul out of town on a rail, fine....but then don’t turn around and give people you like a free pass and who still refuse to apologize for their actions.


84 posted on 01/11/2008 8:06:05 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I see some have almost successfully changed the subject and buried the topic that Paul blatantly lied either in 1996 when he admitted he wrote the articles and they were just taken out of context or in 2001 (and this week) when he claimed he never wrote them and never saw them.


85 posted on 01/11/2008 8:06:08 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
Ron should because we as a party have to have SOME standards, sound character being one of them.

So supporting the murder of infants and disproportionately disarming minorities are signs of "sound character"?

86 posted on 01/11/2008 8:06:14 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
And my tagline is a submariner's expression.

Ahhh, should have Googled. It's Friday and I'm lazy.

87 posted on 01/11/2008 8:07:01 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Paul is not a racist; he just wants racist to believe he is while keeping non-racist convinced that he isn’t. //sarcasm off


88 posted on 01/11/2008 8:08:31 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Al Qaeda: enemy of civilization and humanity. Ron Paul: al Qaeda's puppet and mouthpiece.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
A freeper defending Aristide.

I'm not defending Aristide. I am pointing out that Aristide - like many elected executives who became dictators - played the game of pretending to support popular government at the beginning of their careers.

It's a ruse that was employed by Castro, Mugabe and Chavez as well.

It is currently being played by Evo Morales in Bolivia and Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua.

89 posted on 01/11/2008 8:09:01 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
It's pathetic that so many losers on FR are destroying their reputations by defending this pustulent sack of traitorous effluvia

***************

It's an eye-opener for me.

90 posted on 01/11/2008 8:09:02 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking; wideawake; Captain Kirk

“I guess changing the subject is easier than defending the indefensible.”

How funny! I was CORRECTING wideawake on his incorrect timetable about Fred’s support of Aristide!!! Now I’m ‘changing the subject?’

The proof is in the links below.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=48#48

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=62#62

“You have not made any effort to address the issue at hand. You are using the classic Democrat defense of “everybody does it...””

Total lie. What are you, wideawake’s twin?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=10#10

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=16#16

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=48#48


91 posted on 01/11/2008 8:10:54 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking
And what does that have to do with an article on Ron Paul's lies about the newsletters?

The chick I was responding to in that post is one of the few Giulianites left here on FR. I just saw that Rudy item on the news before work and wanted to rub it in a bit. If you were here early last year and saw some of the nastiness the Rudy people were spewing against Fred, you'd understand.

92 posted on 01/11/2008 8:11:15 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

“I’m not defending Aristide. I am pointing out that Aristide - like many elected executives who became dictators - played the game of pretending to support popular government at the beginning of their careers.”

No he didn’t.

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=62#62


93 posted on 01/11/2008 8:11:51 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
You’re the liar as I proved in post after post on this thread.

Posting broken links to unsubstantiated information isn't "proof" - at least to normal people.

What is true:

Ron Paul admitted in 1996 he wrote the newsletters.

Ron Paul claimed in 2001 that he didn't write them.

Ron Paul's campaign has refused to release copies of his own newsletter to the media.

Either Ron paul was lying in 1996 or he is lying now.

Please tell me which was the lie: the 1996 affirmation or the 2001 denial?

94 posted on 01/11/2008 8:11:54 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
Keep posting the same broken link. You've got nothing.

I ask you again:

Was Paul lying in 1996 when he admitted authoring the newsletter?

Or was he lying in 2001 when he denied writing the newsletter?

It was one or the other. Which was it?

95 posted on 01/11/2008 8:13:44 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

“Guess what the diaper and Paul have in common...”

They are both free-market solutions for catching the production of sh*t?


96 posted on 01/11/2008 8:13:44 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

“Foolishly stood by” describes his actions and his supporters well.


97 posted on 01/11/2008 8:13:50 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Al Qaeda: enemy of civilization and humanity. Ron Paul: al Qaeda's puppet and mouthpiece.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

You still have not made any effort to address the issue at hand. Will you ever address the issue, or will you simply continue to deflect?


98 posted on 01/11/2008 8:14:02 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Paul is not a racist; he just wants racist

People who don't know how to pluralize words ending in "st" should not be allowed on the Internet.

99 posted on 01/11/2008 8:15:12 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

LOL, good grief, RG has ZERO to do with RP’s ZERO accomplishments in office.

Speaking of websites, Ron Paul’s site is always “intertaining”.

http://www.infowars.com/


100 posted on 01/11/2008 8:15:16 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-447 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson