Skip to comments.In 1996, Paul Wasn't Issuing Denials
Posted on 01/11/2008 6:59:44 AM PST by jdm
click here to read article
I think I figured it out, some posters support Marxist Military Coups.
It doesn't look like that's going to be and issue. Thus far the media hasn't characterized him as a Republican, and the DNC hasn't picked up on the issue. His nuttiness and particularly that of his supporters probably helped in that regard. My guess by the time the general election comes around, he'll clearly not be a Republican. The other candidates will be able to handle this issue if it comes up.
Luckily, the GOP has more brains than you, as evidenced by the New Hampshire GOP boycotting the debate last week after they dumped Paul. I'll take their word over the "steely eyed killer of the deep". What does that even mean, anyway?
So your a “fool” if you ever made a foolish mistake oh perfect one? He made a foolish mistake, just like Fred did when he called for Aristide’s restoration to power (and later claimed falsely to the contrary).
This could cost Ron Paul the Republican nomination for President. /sarc
Probably when the Vietnamese government formally apologizes to him for brutally torturing him for years. Imagine a man having unkind words for the nation that deputed sadists to torture him! What gall! It's not as if he had a good excuse for that kind of language, like having a newsletter for example.
BTW, the torture of McCain started around the same time that Ron Paul was sitting around in an air-conditioned National Guard examination room doing things he didn't believe in in exchange for cash.
“That’s changing the subject from the thread topic: i.e. the demonstrated fact that Ron Paul is a lying scumbag.”
He explained this in 2001.
He’s not lying, and he’s not a scumbag.
However, the namecalling - scumbag, traitor, etc.
Aristide was a committed leftist in 1991, as well, btw.
His campaign was marred buy violence of his supporters, he called the US the “Great Satan,” and he urged his supporters to “necklace” his opponents. This was in 1991.
I guess namecalling is easier than researching.
“Probably when the Vietnamese government formally apologizes to him for brutally torturing him for years. Imagine a man having unkind words for the nation that deputed sadists to torture him! What gall! It’s not as if he had a good excuse for that kind of language, like having a newsletter for example.”
McCain did forgive the Vietnamese govt.
He went with Kerry to get the trade normalization pact done.
McCain opened Communist Vietnam to trade with the US.
Again he admitted writing the newsletter before he denied writing the newsletter.
So he was either lying then or he is lying now.
Whatever the answer, he remains a liar.
There was this Republican debate thingie last night, and granted I was two glasses of merlot deep at the time, but I could have sworn Ron Paul was on my TV screen. Maybe I was just f$%&ed up. Who knows?
Which branch of the military did you serve in?
His moment of glory is betraying his country, and taking bloodmoney of the back of our troops, from seditionists, traitors and racists.
He can go to hell.
I must admit, you’re very good at calmly pwning the Posse wannabes on these threads. Well done.
Would you also agree that the GOP needs too distance itself from gun-grabbers and pro-abortion Republicans?
Apparently "researching" to you means reading the columns of gay activist/Ron Paul supporter/Milosevic apologist Justin Raimondo.
The reports of necklacing came from the 1996 split between the OPL party and Aristide's Lavalas faction, when there was open violence in the streets between Aristide supporters and his former allies.
But keep digging.
back to the topic of the thread:
Ron Paul is a lying weasel, as demonstrated by the libertarian Reason Magazine's inability to justify his continuously changing story about his whacko newsletter.
So you think its okay to call the Vietnamese Gooks (still not fully apologized for), but not okay for Paul who unlike McCain, has fully apologize for his newsletters, eh? McCain can be a racist and that's okay with you.
A freeper defending Aristide. Imagine that. Next, you’ll be defending Chavez and Castro (both of whom your pal Aristide admires).