Skip to comments.Changes in the Sunís Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
Posted on 01/12/2008 10:24:01 AM PST by SamAdams76
Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the suns surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.
Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier research he led that independently discovered the suns changes are the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from cold climate to warm and back again.
We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are historic and important changes taking place on the suns surface. This will have only one outcome - a new climate change is coming that will bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. This is not however a unique event for the planet although it is critically important news to this and the next generations. It is but the normal sequence of alternating climate changes that has been going on for thousands of years. Further according to our research, this series of solar cycles are so predictable that they can be used to roughly forecast the next series of climate changes many decades in advance. I have verified the accuracy of these cycles behavior over the last 1,100 years relative to temperatures on Earth, to well over 90%.
As to what these changes are Casey says, The suns surface flows have slowed dramatically as NASA has indicated. This process of surface movement, what NASA calls the conveyor belt essentially sweeps up old sunspots and deposits new ones. NASAs studies have found that when the surface movement slows down, sunspot counts drop significantly. All records of sunspot counts and other proxies of solar activity going back 6,000 years clearly validates our own findings that when we have sunspot counts lower then 50 it means only one thing - an intense cold climate, globally. NASA says the solar cycle 25, the one after the next that starts this spring will be at 50 or lower. The general opinion of the SSRC scientists is that it could begin even sooner within 3 years with the next solar cycle 24. What we are saying today is that my own research and that of the other scientists at the SSRC verifies that NASA is right about one thing a solar cycle of 50 or lower is headed our way. With this next solar minimum predicted by NASA, what I call a solar hibernation, the SSRC forecasts a much colder Earth just as it has transpired before for thousands of years. If NASA is the more accurate on the schedule, then we may see even warmer temperatures before the bottom falls out. If the SSRC and other scientists around the world are correct then we have only a few years to prepare before 20-30 years of lasting and possibly dangerous cold arrive.
When asked about what this will mean to the average person on the street, Casey was firm. The last time this particular cycle regenerated was over 200 years ago. I call it the Bi-Centennial Cycle solar cycle. It took place between 1793 and 1830, the so-called Dalton Minimum, a period of extreme cold that resulted in what historian John D. Post called the last great subsistence crisis. With that cold came massive crops losses, food riots, famine and disease. I believe this next climate change will be much stronger and has the potential to once more cause widespread crop losses globally with the resultant ill effects. The key difference for this next Bi-Centennial Cycles impact versus the last is that we will have over 8 billion mouths to feed in the next coldest years where as we had only 1 billion the last time. Among other effects like social and economic disruption, we are facing the real prospect of the perfect storm of global food shortages in the next climate change. In answer to the question, everyone on the street will be affected.
Given the importance of the next climate change Casey was asked whether the government has been notified. Yes, as soon as my research revealed these solar cycles and the prediction of the coming cold era with the next climate change, I notified all the key offices in the Bush administration including both parties in the Senate and House science committees as well as most of the nations media outlets. Unfortunately, because of the intensity of coverage of the UN IPCC and man made global warming during 2007, the full story about climate change is very slow in getting told. These changes in the sun have begun. They are unstoppable. With the word finally starting to get out about the next climate change, hopefully we will have time to prepare. Right now, the newly organized SSRC is the leading independent research center in the US and possibly worldwide, that is focused on the next climate change. Some of the worlds brightest scientists, also experts in solar physics and the next climate change have joined with me. In the meantime we will do our best to spread the word along with NASA and others who can see what is about to take place for the Earths climate. Soon, I believe this will be recognized as the most important climate story of this century.
More information on the Space and Science Research Center is available at: www.spaceandscience.net
Bookmarking for later.
This ought to be fun.... Wonder how the global a-warmists will spin this one.
He's going to be one pissed off climate deity when he can't sell any more carbon credits after this news gets out......
May you live in interesting times.
I will be 90 and you will have to yell to get my attention because I will be both asleep and deaf. Or wide awake, which would be an indistinguishable state of consciousness.
We already do.
How else do you explain Ron Paul being on the Republican ticket? :P
John L. Casey Director, Space and Science Research Center
Mr. Casey has accumulated over thirty years of professional experience spanning a wide variety of technologies, industries, and international endeavors, to include performing important services as a space policy advisor to the White House, and Congress. He has been a consultant to NASA Headquarters, and conducted satellite launch studies for the Department of Defense. His experience also includes being a former space shuttle engineer, military missile and computer systems officer, advanced rocketry and commercial space developer. He has an extensive executive management background in the start-up and financing of high technology companies. He has a BS degree in Physics and Mathematics and an MA degree in Management. He is active in his community in environmental and conservation activities and was past Chairman of GFSD, an international charity that provided aid to women and children in Iraq and Afghanistan. You can contact Mr. Casey directly at firstname.lastname@example.org
Didn’t Al Gore invent the sun?
Another man-made climate change denier trying to confuse the sheeple with facts.
“This ought to be fun.... Wonder how the global a-warmists will spin this one.”
They have their scam covered already. They are already saying climate change rather than global warming. The cooling will be blamed on the same capitalism as the warming.
...not that the latest Nobel Prize for Peace recipient has a clue what he’s blathering about either.
I guess we better start burning more oil, coal, gasoline and wood to head it off at the pass. Let’s trap some heat waves in the atmosphere before it hits......
Wind and solar....passe!
< / Sarc>
I'd love for this to be true, and there is some indications it may be, but I'd like to see more than a press release from one guy. Peer review might be nice.
Well, it would be interesting to see if anyone has seen any trends in all the different forms of radiation from the sun, though obviously you can’t get it over a time span that large. Indirect evidence of solar activity (including sun spots) from 6000 years ago sounds just a little implausible.
So Gore is a dope! All this talk about GW was nothing but propaganda to further a political agenda: government control over light bulbs, toilets, thermostats, “carbon emissions”, and higher taxes.
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
"what have we done to the
Didnt Al Gore invent the sun?
No, he did however invent the world wide tanning bed.
And how do we know all that you may ask? Simple, because AlGorus the Seer told us, and told us, and told us, and told us, and tol...........
~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ping~~
There are strange things done in the midnight sun
By the men who moil for gold;
The Arctic trails have their secret tales
That would make your blood run cold;
The Northern Lights have seen queer sights,
But the queerest they ever did see
Was that night on the marge of Lake Lebarge
I cremated Sam McGee.
Oh man, that graphic is priceless.
Yup. "Climate Change" works a lot better, because climate always changes, and they can never be wrong now. And it tested more positive with focus groups than their other new slogan, "just give us the money anyway."
See, even the sun is affected by global warming..!
Does this mean we must increase our carbon emissions to mitigate the effects of cooling?
global cooling ping — should we tell algore?
Better start pumping out that CO2.
There goes my dream of a pygmy pony ranch empire in Barrow.
Ooh, good one!
Casey is the director. From the web site it is unclear how many contributing scientist there are. It is more than one. Sounds like NASA scientist acting as independant consultants.
Links on site: Long Range Solar Forecast
We better start now if we are to avert this. My plan involves sprinklers and 93 million miles of garden hose. Wait, scratch that. Okay, how about a bunch of air conditioners and a long extension cord. Wait, maybe a bunch of solar powered air conditioners! That’s the ticket!
Exactly what I have thought for years concerning "global warming".
Yes, I noticed the change between "global warming" and "climate change" a couple of years ago.
I believe it is because "global warming" was becoming the punchline of too many jokes when looking at film of people up to their patooties in snow and ice.
I can’t say much either way about his theory. But you shouldn’t dismiss it just because of his resume. I believe thee was some young punk working for the patent office in Switzerland who came up with a theory that turned out to be pretty interesting.
Not only that, but the Internet, the chicken, the egg, Marxism, the pregnant chad with dimples, the solar system, history, time, the calorie, CO2, shade, snow, etc. just to name a few.
Say what? Speak up, I can't hear you!
We can easily increase our carbon emmisions by eating more beef and drinking more ethanol.
Oh sure, we can restore some of the H20 that the planet looses by burning stored fossil fuels and releasing the combustion products into the atmosphere but this is a finite resource. At some point we are going to have to start importing water from elsewhere in the solar system. Personally I don’t look forward to dealing the the Kuiper Belt water cartel.
Of course in 500 million years this won’t make any difference. The sun will start to swell as it begins to leave the main sequence and head for the “zone of instability”. Then we’ll see some real global warming. At that point we will have four options - leave (but good planets are hard to find), learn to control the sun’s fusion reactions, move the planet to a cooler part of the solar system or just sit here and die while the priesthood blames it all on an ancient demon know as “Bush”.
How do you know there is more than one person at the center?
Even if it is, the director is a rocket guy, not a science guy. That's like allowing your car mechanic to give you surgery because overhauling an engine and repairing your body are both "fixing things".
Hey, I hope what they're saying is true. And I think it is. But they're not going to convince anyone until they can get some real people and real science to back them up.
Pretty busy for a management guy.
Yes, I kind of wonder if he’s a Republican fundraiser on the side.
The text refers to multiple scientist. Granted names are not included unless you take the link at the bottom to the nasa site. You then find multiple persons linked to solar physics
Even if it is, the director is a rocket guy, not a science guy.
Casey holds a degree in BA in Physics. The study of Physics is much broader than rockets. In fact it is the basis for many sciences. Those that I know involved with Nasa have broad expertise.