Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco police reviewing tiger victims' cell phones, car
Mercury News ^ | 1/16/2008 | Leslie Griffy

Posted on 01/16/2008 12:35:55 PM PST by repinwi

San Francisco police today began their review of the cell phones and car belonging to the survivors of a Christmas Day tiger attack at the San Francisco Zoo, officials said.

< snip >

A San Francisco Superior Court judge granted a search warrant allowing police to examine the cell phones and car on Tuesday.

For police and city officials to get the warrant, they needed to show probable cause of felony wrongdoing, a city official said.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; US: California
KEYWORDS: animalsarepeopletoo; idiots; sanfrancisco; tiger; zoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
Now we'll get to the bottom of things.
1 posted on 01/16/2008 12:35:56 PM PST by repinwi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: repinwi

AFTER they’ve already said there would be no charges?


2 posted on 01/16/2008 12:38:28 PM PST by digger48 (http://prorev.com/legacy.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repinwi
The more I read about this case, the more the perps appear to be irresponsible, barbaric, bullying assclowns with no respect for rules, authority, or even their own parents.

What kind of person evades Christmas with the family and instead gets drunk and goes to the zoo?

3 posted on 01/16/2008 12:39:36 PM PST by -=SoylentSquirrel=- (I'm really made of people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
From another article:

"...Santa Clara County prosecutor Stuart Scott told Superior Court Judge Michele McKay McCoy on Tuesday that he will file a charge of battery on a police officer against 19-year-old Paul Dhaliwal.

Dhaliwal and his older brother, Kulbir, 23, already face two misdemeanor counts of public drunkenness and resisting arrest. The incident happened On Sept. 7, after police stopped them for questioning as they walked down a street near their home. Police were responding to reports of a fight and thought they looked suspicious...

4 posted on 01/16/2008 12:42:29 PM PST by -=SoylentSquirrel=- (I'm really made of people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-

They remind ne of a bulgular who falls through a skylight and wants to sue the building owner. Treat them like Columbo ... (lame AI reference from yesterdays show).


5 posted on 01/16/2008 12:46:29 PM PST by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: repinwi

YOu gotta be a pretty big jerk to make me root for the tiger, but these guys look like they fit the bill.


6 posted on 01/16/2008 12:46:35 PM PST by gridlock (300,000,000 Americans will not be elected President in 2008. Hillary will be one of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-

Thanks, I’d not seen that.


7 posted on 01/16/2008 12:46:52 PM PST by digger48 (http://prorev.com/legacy.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-
The more I read about this case, the more the perps appear to be irresponsible, barbaric, bullying assclowns with no respect for rules, authority, or even their own parents. What kind of person evades Christmas with the family and instead gets drunk and goes to the zoo?

One: Were they actually drunk? Two: Did they really have slingshots with them? Three: If they had been drinking what was their blood alcohol level? Four: Do you really think that someone deserves to be chewed and killed by a tiger for merely teasing it somewhat? Five: Where were the officials that are supposed to stop this type of teasing(if such really occured)? Six: Why are you not calling the zoo officials assclowns for having a fence 4 feet lower than reccomended for containing tigers?

To answer your question about who evades Christmas to go get drunk at the zoo, I really don't know. What I do know is that evading Christmas and getting drunk at the zoo isn't a death penalty offense.

8 posted on 01/16/2008 12:47:12 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: digger48

They need to preserve evidence for the inevitable civil suit against the zoo, part of which is owned by the city.

If the guys were making a video for YouTube or something like “Jackass,” that needs to be known, as an aggravating factor.


9 posted on 01/16/2008 12:51:15 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calex59

. . . personal accountability . . .


10 posted on 01/16/2008 12:54:02 PM PST by Per-Ling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Four: Do you really think that someone deserves to be chewed and killed by a tiger for merely teasing it somewhat?

Yes.

Photobucket

Six: Why are you not calling the zoo officials assclowns for having a fence 4 feet lower than reccomended for containing tigers?

Well, the height of the wall was never an issue until these punks came along.

11 posted on 01/16/2008 12:54:29 PM PST by -=SoylentSquirrel=- (I'm really made of people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Four: Do you really think that someone deserves to be chewed and killed by a tiger for merely teasing it somewhat?

Anti-animal hate crime. The tiger is not guilty by reason of temporary insanity, and the police overreacted and shot a member of an underprivileged minority who should not be held accountable for reacting when provoked.

12 posted on 01/16/2008 12:56:34 PM PST by AbeKrieger (There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
Anti-animal hate crime. The tiger is not guilty by reason of temporary insanity, and the police overreacted and shot a member of an underprivileged minority who should not be held accountable for reacting when provoked.

Sad to say but there are a whole bunch of morons who really believe that.

13 posted on 01/16/2008 12:59:52 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calex59

If indeed they were taunting the tiger, of course I don’t think they deserved to get killed for it. HOWEVER, they were endangering every other human at the zoo, which is incredibly irresponsible.

Then again, they had every reason to believe the tiger couldn’t get out.


14 posted on 01/16/2008 1:00:59 PM PST by Marie2 (I used to be disgusted. . .now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Four: Do you really think that someone deserves to be chewed and killed by a tiger for merely teasing it somewhat?

Simply put: HELL YEAH!!!


15 posted on 01/16/2008 1:01:34 PM PST by bshomoic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-
All of that stuff dates back to september, has nothing to do with the tiger BS, it is a misdemeanor charge.
16 posted on 01/16/2008 1:06:39 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
YOu gotta be a pretty big jerk to make me root for the tiger...

Photobucket

Why? Man put a wild animal in a cage. The tiger sure would prefer to be at home in the wild. How would you like to be put in a cage? The perps that taunted the tiger should be in jail.

I back Tygger.

17 posted on 01/16/2008 1:07:19 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-
What kind of person evades Christmas with the family and instead gets drunk and goes to the zoo?

Uhhh, judging by their names, non-Christians who don't celebrate Christmas?

18 posted on 01/16/2008 1:08:01 PM PST by Albion Wilde ("Whatever enables us to go to war, secures our peace." —Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: calex59; pandoraou812
Do you really think that someone deserves to be chewed and killed by a tiger for merely teasing it somewhat?

I'll bet the tiger thought so.

There are consequences for their actions even if they didn't like them. Reality smacked them upside the head and now they don't like it. Too bad.

If the cell phones have evidence that this was some sort of gang initiation or something, the other two guys should be charged with manslaughter, of homicide and shouldn't get a penny from the lawsuit they were so quick to file.

19 posted on 01/16/2008 1:09:22 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: repinwi
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
20 posted on 01/16/2008 1:09:36 PM PST by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson