Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: max americana

About 25 years of which were spent on debating whether an N-sub was required in the first place.


10 posted on 01/19/2008 12:13:22 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki
About 25 years of which were spent on debating whether an N-sub was required in the first place.

And the answer was yes. Without SSBNs, a nuclear deterrent has no credibility unless you want to either move missiles periodically on trucks and trains or keep airplanes with nukes in the air 24/7. The problem is that SSBNs are extraordinarily expensive to build and maintain. And you have to build them quiet so that they aren't followed. Good luck to India on the endeavor. I just hope they have the security procedures in place to prevent this technology from leaking to Pakistan. The last thing the world needs is for Pakistan to have the technology to build a blue water sub that can deploy nuclear weapons around the world.

13 posted on 01/19/2008 12:53:17 AM PST by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson