Posted on 01/19/2008 7:54:17 AM PST by Mr. Silverback
Thumbs up!
Hey, if I didn't give a crap, I wouldn't be on your Nanny State ping list, FRiend.
“Most of the Ron Paul supporters have already been given the boot here, because they crossed the line or you guys kept pinging the Mods because you were getting beat-down in discussion.”
Wrong dude, just board of base innuendo. We all have our limitations...
Thanks for the info, but I’m not the one who said what you were quoting. I’m only aware of two Paul backers whove been ejected, and I’m not sure one of them was booted for anything to do with Paul.
BTW...if you think this stuff is base innuendo, wait until you see to tomorrow’s thread!
Congratualations. Would you like a medal?
You might want to work on that "thinking" some.
Didn't take them long. They flock to threads they claim beat a dead horse so shouldn't be posted to begin with. Go figure.
You mean here Paul's Pausse Where I asked you to respond, I've repeated that request more than once since then, and you still refuse to reply? It that what you mean?
No, I'm not stalking you, Bucko, I'm simply asking for the courtesy of a reply. And will continue to do so until you have the guts to defend yourself for misstating me.
NICK - You sound just like all the other tired idiots trying to call Ron Paul the same dam thing - racists, haters, anti-semites blah blah blah.... Ive know Poker Face for a long time. What they hate are criminals of ALL races.I haven't looked at Ron Paul as a candidate, but I do have a very conservative buddy who is supporting the guy. But the posts of his supporters on his sites look pretty scary.
Except in our lamestream press the criminal/antiAmerican/traitor Jews get a pass. You sound like you are a semite sensitive who sees an anti-semite behind every tree. For most of America, we are sick and tired of fools like you crying WOLF all the time.
. . .
Freedom means having the right to disagree, or think differently. You seem to be shoving all of us into your small minded box of thinking.... anti-semite anti semites are every where.... blah blah blah
And if Poker Face are racists, then I and the majority of America are racists... AMERICAN RACISTS that is. . . .
No, the satisfaction of a job well done is enough for me.
Wait ntiil you see today’s thread. I’ll ping you.
It gets worse. I’ll ping you to today’s post.
ntiil = until
Not enough coffee yet!
Have you seen the turning radius of a PT boat and the turning radius of a destroyer? See "A Question of Character: The Life of John F. Kennedy" by Thomas Reeves for full details. Reeves says Kennedy and his crew wre probably literally caught napping. That sounds like Paul's newsletter story to me.
No crying here, unless the Packers lose today.
Tim Russert even conceded that Paul will make it beyond Super Tuesday to the GOP convention.
Post #16 and post #39 of yours, bucko. You implied that Paul supporters were Troofers and Nazis.
You can kill the theme music because you just lost your wager.
Why give money from someone else's donation back to Black? Black's money was already spent by the campaign before it was brought to Paul's attention.
or to refuse to appear on the radio program of someone who believes that the United States government orchestrated the destruction of the Twin Towers and attack on the Pentagon
Because Jones is a syndicated radio show host, he has an audience of libertarians and populists/independents just like Rush has conservatives. His personal beliefs have no bearing on Paul.
Not all of his topics deal with wacko 9/11 conspiracy theories. He talks about privacy, sovereignty, abuse of government powers, etc. If you were ever on FR back in the late 1990s, we were talking about this stuff too.
or to reveal who penned those defamatory, racist, anti-Semitic newsletters if-as he claims-he is not the sole author?
Reports are coming out that Lew Rockewell authored the letters, but I'm not sure. But this is a dead horse. The Houston Chronicle covered this extensively in the 1990s.
ROFL. "Like, he's totally a wacko, duh!"
I replied in that thread.
Like that’s going to happen.
Puhleeze. The poster I was responding to in 16 was saying that we should not eject any of Paul's supporters because it would reduce the size of the coalition. Mty reference to Nazis and Truthers was intended to point out that if we keep all you Paul crazies in the name of the big tent, we have to keep some Nazis and Truthers.
As for post 39, in that I referred to "you" meaning all Ron Paul supporters. You were the one talking about Nazis and Truthers.
It seems that no matter how many times I say that I don't think all of his suppporters are Troofers and Nazis, I get told I'm saying all of Paul's supporters are Troofers and Nazis. Same thing with the candidate himself. Once again, the charge that I'm a disingenuous poster comes from someone doing it himself.
Oh no, actually, I'm feeling that satisfaction right now. Looking forward to a Packer win today as well.
Enjoy your delusion. I’m done with you.
The Jewish Task Force talks about those things too, which doesn't mean that the people who host cable access programs for that group aren't lunatics.
As far as I know, Paul hasn't agreed to appear on any of those program.
Why should whether someone is "nationally syndicated" have a bearing on your decision to appear, or refuse to appear, on his radio program?
If David Duke were somehow able to sign a national syndication contract with Clear Channel, would that mean that Paul should appear on his radio program?
Fr. Coughlin hosted a radio program that was more popular than the kookfest Alex Jones operates today, does that mean that the bilious, bigoted opinions he expressed on that program deserved the explicit endorsement of presidential candidates?
Have you seen the turning radius of a PT boat and the turning radius of a destroyer? See "A Question of Character: The Life of John F. Kennedy" by Thomas Reeves for full details. Reeves says Kennedy and his crew wre probably literally caught napping. That sounds like Paul's newsletter story to me.
And they call the Ron Paul supporters conspiracy nuts!
Smart teens!
It's conspiracy nuttery to believe that a PT boat can out turn a destroyer?
I think I'm seeing the intellectual prowess that's led you to be in the barrel for Ron Paul.
Only a conspiracy nut would question what happened to Kennedy and PT109.
A PT boat can outturn a destroyer if it sees it in time.
Collision! PT-109 was one of the boats left behind. Lieutenant Kennedy rendezvoused his boat with PT-162 of his own patrol section and PT-169, which had been separated from another section, and the three boats spread out to make a picket line across the strait. At about 2:30 in the morning, a shape loomed out of the darkness three hundred yards off PT-109's starboard bow. So difficult was visibility that it was first believed to be another PT. When it became apparent that it was one of the Japanese destroyers, Kennedy attempted to turn to starboard to bring his torpedoes to bear. But there was not enough time. The destroyer, later identified as the Amagiri, the escort ship of the Express, struck PT-109 just forward of the forward starboard torpedo tube, ripping away the starboard aft side of the boat. Less than a minute had passed since the first sighting. http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/JFK+in+History/John+F.+Kennedy+and+PT109.htm
The reason I referred you to Reeves’ book is because he provides a lot more evidence. If your library doesn’t have it, they can get it through interlibrary loan.
Evidence of what?
Nothing that happened that night reflects poorly on Kennedy.
And the evidence for this claim of dereliction of duty is?
Of course, I'll gladly withdraw my reference to JFK, even though it was offered truthfully. You see, I've been in military organizations and I've been the editor of a national publication, and I can tell you that the "five years without reading the newsletter" fiasco is, if true, far more of a screwup than anything John Kennedy did in the Pacific or in office.
I wasn't judging the book, I was finding out the issue regarding PT109.
So, the issue was that according to the author, Kennedy was delerict in his duty and that is why the boat was cut in two, not in the darkness of early morning, but in broad daylight.
There's more in there. For example, Reeves describes how Jack at first wanted to avoid any discussion of himself as a "war hero" because he considered his most heroic moment to be a big clusterhuck. It's been about four years since I read it, but I didn't walk away thining "This is much ado about nothing." To me the main thing is that Joe Kennedy wanted a vision of his boy going down fighting, so that's what he created. Even if JFK himself didn't actually screw the pooch out there, the fix was in to make him out to be something he wasn't. After reading bios of Kennedy, the thing I was most convinced of was that Joe Kennedy was a son of Hell. If their father had been a decent human being, I think Jack, Bobby and Teddy would have been great men in every sense of the word. Of course, I'll gladly withdraw my reference to JFK, even though it was offered truthfully. You see, I've been in military organizations and I've been the editor of a national publication, and I can tell you that the "five years without reading the newsletter" fiasco is, if true, far more of a screwup than anything John Kennedy did in the Pacific or in office.
Well, thank you for withdrawing it.
Ofcourse any skipper of a ship/boat is not going to feel proud of losing his ship/boat, no matter what the circumstances and how well he did after losing the ship/boat.
Unlike Kerry, Kennedy actually did show real courage and leadership ability.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.