Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UnphenomenalTimes - Fake but ... fake.
National Review Online ^ | January 19, 2008 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 01/19/2008 11:43:43 AM PST by neverdem







UnphenomenalTimes
Fake but ... fake.

By Mark Steyn

Have you been in an airport recently, and maybe seen a gaggle of America’s heroes returning from Iraq? And you’ve probably thought, “Ah, what a marvelous sight. Remind me to straighten up the old ‘Support Our Troops’ fridge magnet, which seems to have slipped down below the reminder to reschedule my acupuncturist. Maybe I should go over and thank them for their service.”

No, no, no, under no account approach them. Instead, try to avoid making eye contact and back away slowly toward the sign for the parking garage. You’re in the presence of mentally damaged violent killers who could snap at any moment.

You hadn’t heard that? Well, it’s in the New York Times: “a series of articles” — that’s right, a whole series — “about veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan who have committed killings, or been charged with them, after coming home.” It’s an epidemic, folks. As the Times put it: “Town by town across the country, headlines have been telling similar stories. Lakewood, Wash.: ‘Family Blames Iraq After Son Kills Wife.’ Pierre, S.D.: ‘Soldier Charged With Murder Testifies About Postwar Stress.’ Colorado Springs: ‘Iraq War Vets Suspected in Two Slayings, Crime Ring.’”

Obviously, as America’s “newspaper of record,” the Times would resent any suggestion that it’s anti-military. I’m sure if you were one of these crazed military stalker whackjobs following the reporters home you’d find their cars sporting the patriotic bumper sticker “We Support Our Troops, Even After They’ve Been Convicted.” As usual, the Times stories are written in the fey more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger tone that’s a shoo-in come Pulitzer time: “Individually, these are stories of local crimes, gut-wrenching postscripts to the war for the military men, their victims and their communities. Taken together, they paint the patchwork picture of a quiet phenomenon, tracing a cross-country trail of death and heartbreak.”

“Patchwork picture,” “quiet phenomenon”… Yes, yes, but exactly how quiet is the phenomenon? How patchy is the picture?” The New York Times found 121 cases in which veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan either “committed a killing in this country, or were charged with one.” The “committed a killing” formulation includes car accidents.

Thus, with declining deaths in theater, the media narrative evolves. Old story: “America’s soldiers are being cut down by violent irrational insurgents we can never hope to understand.” New story: “Americans are being cut down by violent irrational soldiers we can never hope to understand.” In the quagmire of these veterans’ minds, every leafy Connecticut subdivision is Fallujah and every Dunkin’ Donuts clerk an Abu Musab al-Zarqawi with an annoyingly perky manner.

It was the work of minutes for the Powerline website’s John Hinderaker to discover that the “quiet phenomenon” is entirely unphenomenal: It didn’t seem to occur to the Times to check whether the murder rate among recent veterans is higher than that of the general population of young men. It’s not. Au contraire, the columnist Ralph Peters calculated that Iraq and Afghanistan vets are about a fifth as likely to murder you as the average 18-34 year-old American male. Better yet, the blogger Iowahawk meticulously drew his own “patchwork picture” of another “quiet phenomenon”: the Denver newspaper columnist arrested for stalking, the Cincinnati TV reporter facing child-molestation charges, the Philadelphia anchorwoman who went on a violent drunken rampage. As Iowahawk’s one-man investigative unit wondered:

“Unrelated incidents, or mounting evidence that America’s newsrooms have become a breeding ground for murderous, drunk, gun-wielding child molesters?”

Why would the Times run such a series? My columnar confrere Clifford May connected it to a notorious anniversary: Seventy-five years ago, in February 1933, the Oxford Union passed a famous resolution, by an overwhelming margin, that “this House would under no circumstances fight for its King and country.” The Union was the world’s most famous debating society, in a great university of the dominant global power; its presidents have gone on to serve as Prime Ministers at home and overseas, from Gladstone in the 19th century all the way to Benazir Bhutto in the 1990s.

So the debate and its resolution sent a message to Britain’s enemies: As Churchill saw it, the vote was a “disgusting symptom” of the enervation of the ruling elites. Clifford May sees that same syndrome today around the western world, but, in fact, it’s worse than that.

The Oxford debate took place a decade and a half after the worst carnage in human history. The First World War cost the lives of some 20 million people. Do you remember back in 2004 when Ted Koppel devoted one episode of Nightline to reading out the names of everyone killed in combat in Iraq? If he’d attempted a similar task with the British Empire’s war dead in 1919, the half-hour episode of Nightline would have had to be extended to ten months — or longer if Ted took bathroom breaks, or indeed pauses for breath. The war reached into the smallest English hamlet and culled a generation of young men. It swept through the glittering palaces, too: The brother of Queen Elizabeth (the mother of the present queen) was killed on the western front in 1915. It would be a statistical improbability to have been at that Oxford Union debate and have come from a home in which on some mantle or bureau there was not a photograph of a son or uncle or fiancé forever young.It would be as if millions upon millions had been slaughtered in the first Gulf war, and 15 years later Harvard or Yale were debating whether we should do it all over again.

In other words, we don’t have their excuse. Our war has one of the lowest fatality rates of any war ever, and, when they get so low that even Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid temporarily give up the quagmire bleating, the Times invents bogus stories to suggest that the few veterans lucky enough to make it out of Iraq alive are ticking timebombs ready to explode across every Main Street in the land.

A few days before the Times series began, The National Journal published the latest debunking of a notorious survey: in 2006, the medical journal The Lancet reported that the Iraq war had killed over 650,000 civilians, over 90 percent victims of the US military. That’s 500 civilians a day. Which is quite a smell test. The figure was over ten times the estimates even of hardcore antiwar left-wing groups. Who are these 500 daily victims? Why aren’t there mass riots by Iraqi civilians protesting the daily bloodbath?

Because it’s fake. It didn’t happen.

Yet it’s indestructible. I picked up a local paper in New Hampshire the other day, and a lady psychotherapist was twittering about our “mentally wounded” troops returning home after killing gazillions and bazillions of Iraqi civilians. In 1933, the debaters at Oxford were horrified by the real cost of war. In 2008, the editors of the Times, our college professors and Hollywood celebrities, are horrified by a fiction. Faced with an historically low cost of war, they retreat into fantasy. Who’s really suffering from mental trauma? Who needs the psychotherapy here?

© Mark Steyn 2008



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; iraq; newyorktimes; nytimes; oefveterans; oifveterans; steyn; veterans

1 posted on 01/19/2008 11:43:45 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
You Nailed It!
Nailed It !

2 posted on 01/19/2008 11:49:52 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Ping


3 posted on 01/19/2008 11:57:13 AM PST by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Interesting that you posted this.

Right next to my post Why Does Johnny Come Marching Homeless?

A story on how messed up in the head our vets are.

4 posted on 01/19/2008 11:57:16 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I saw where the bogus study was funded by George Soros. Tell me how bad I would feel if I saw a Drudge headline tomorrow that reads, “George Soros Found Dead Hanging from a Tall Oak in Central Park”.


5 posted on 01/19/2008 11:59:36 AM PST by RightWingConspirator (Redefeat Communism by defeating Hitlary in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Why would the Times run such a series?

Unbiased "journalistic" conveyance of the news via "reporting" of course. /s

6 posted on 01/19/2008 12:01:10 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
in 2006, the medical journal The Lancet reported that the Iraq war had killed over 650,000 civilians, over 90 percent victims of the US military. That’s 500 civilians a day.

There was an article in last week's WSJ stating that George Soros had helped with funding the Lancet study. One of his lackeys wrote a letter later that week insisting that so august a journal as The Lancet would never let itself be influenced by George Soros. She then went on to defend the study itself, implying that the study just had to be correct or pretty close, saying that the number of Iraqi dead was almost surely higher than the US Army's statistics show.

7 posted on 01/19/2008 12:01:17 PM PST by Hardastarboard (DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; =Intervention=; adam_az; an amused spectator; bert; bitt; BlessedBeGod; ...

Based on an amused spectator's list
Send FReepmail if you want on/off MSP list
The List of Ping Lists

Iowahawk's scathing send-up of the Times article: BYLINES OF BRUTALITY

8 posted on 01/19/2008 12:04:09 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; Responsibility2nd

Thanks for the links.


9 posted on 01/19/2008 12:10:01 PM PST by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aflaak

ping


10 posted on 01/19/2008 12:14:24 PM PST by r-q-tek86 (If your not taking flak, your not over the target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

These creeps never die out. I remember as a kid hearing the liberals whine and wring their hands over the possibility of our returning WWII troops being so crazed with bloodlust that they will contine to kill when they got home.

What happened? The next thing the liberals were complaining about was the “boring” 50s. It seemed that all those kill-crazy veterans had had enough violence to last them a lifetime and all they wanted to do is make up those lost 4-5 years by knuckling down and being successful.


11 posted on 01/19/2008 12:25:15 PM PST by Oatka (A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

12 posted on 01/19/2008 12:31:06 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Times must die.
13 posted on 01/19/2008 12:31:34 PM PST by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

M.S. rocks. Great link to Iowahawk, too.


14 posted on 01/19/2008 12:33:51 PM PST by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingConspirator

or like “Iowahawk meticulously drew his own “patchwork picture” of another “quiet phenomenon”: the Denver newspaper columnist arrested for stalking, the Cincinnati TV reporter facing child-molestation charges, the Philadelphia anchorwoman who went on a violent drunken rampage. As Iowahawk’s one-man investigative unit wondered:

“Unrelated incidents, or mounting evidence that America’s newsrooms have become a breeding ground for murderous, drunk, gun-wielding child molesters?”

methinks the new media is doing a great job shining the light back onto the pencil necked press....perhaps the light needs turned toward billionaire anti-Americans with BDS.


15 posted on 01/19/2008 12:47:29 PM PST by CRBDeuce (an armed society is a polite society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Unrelated incidents, or mounting evidence that America’s newsrooms have become a breeding ground for murderous, drunk, gun-wielding child molesters?”

ROFLMAO!

Gotta love ‘em!


16 posted on 01/19/2008 12:47:42 PM PST by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Mark Steyn exposes the enemy...yet again.


17 posted on 01/19/2008 12:56:10 PM PST by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

I guess Dan Rather contributed to the story.


18 posted on 01/19/2008 1:56:43 PM PST by hdstmf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Swords into Plowshares? Victor Davis Hanson

Checking It Twice - Election officials have had no practical way to guarantee a correct ballot...

Super delegates may sink the Democrats

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

19 posted on 01/19/2008 4:25:33 PM PST by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

Thanks for the ping ND. Steyn et al do real investigative journalism(finding the actual statistics) while calling the NYT to the mat for NOT doing real investigative journalism while exposing them for the real anti-military group of hacks they are. Love it.


20 posted on 01/19/2008 5:40:51 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The leftist MSM are domestic enemies.


21 posted on 01/19/2008 8:24:19 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


22 posted on 01/19/2008 9:41:16 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

Thanks neverdem. I guess the Slimes isn’t interested in the number of Americans murdered by illegal aliens, eh?


23 posted on 01/20/2008 4:36:47 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Steyn Bump


24 posted on 01/21/2008 1:55:58 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Mark Steyn is on my Must Read list, along with Dr. Thomas Sowell, Ann Coulter and Orson Scott Card.


25 posted on 01/21/2008 2:00:37 PM PST by TChris ("if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy." -RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson