Skip to comments.Reported Bush Lied 'Study' Not Revealed as Funded By George Soros
Posted on 01/23/2008 10:13:24 AM PST by stickman20089
Well, the AP has done it again. They have given us leftist propaganda and painted it as news. This time they have published the results of a "study" that claims that "Bush lied" in the run up to the actions in Iraq and somehow the AP forgot to mention that the organization that released this study was funded by the extreme leftist George Soros who has spent billions funding the Democrat Party and many far left think tank and advocacy organizations. Yeah, THAT study is going to be legitimate!
This one may as well have been just a reprint of the press release of the Soros funded Center for Public Integrity, but the AP dressed it up as an actual story written by Douglass K. Daniel. Headlined "Study: False statements preceded war," the AP reveals how, "A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks."
(Excerpt) Read more at publiusforum.townhall.com ...
If Rush Limbaugh funded a study that concluded that the Clintons lied, I wonder if the AP would run it as straight news without mentioning the fact that Rush funded it. My guess is no.
Yea, and that giant sucking sound your hearing is the media pucker up on Georgie Soros' furry butt.
I have family and friends with their minds “stuck on stupid” too.
It is unbelievable that they will believe some repeated statements.
They do not evaluate the source and will not even listen to the real facts.
When are they going to indict him?
This was just reported on Brit Hume’s show on Fox.
When he’s dead and they’ve spent all his money on preventing green house gases from escaping into our fragile environment from his decomposing body in that metal encased wooden casket they buried him in.
You mean they are going to indict Soros?
The need for war was not to remove the weapons Iraq had in the 80/90's.
It was to stop his development of nuclear and biological weapons.
No, but Brit brought up the facts about the bogus claims of the study and that Soros funded it.
It was both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.