This AP story should have been labeled a press release. Thats what it amounts to.
A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.
The study concluded that the statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.
The study was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism.
This late in the war, Im not even sure why anyone would bother trotting out the Bush LIED, people DIED line. If you havent bought it by now, youre not likely to, and if you already buy it, you already buy it. I suppose seeing it in print one more time could be your Daily Affirmation that were living in Bushreichs Amerikkka.
In any case, by stopping the research at 2001, the story is set-up to misreport the facts. The Clinton administration spent years warning the public of the threat of Saddam and his WMD. They even bombed a pharma factory in Sudan on the suspicion that it was making WMD for both al Qaeda and Iraq. So the story either unintentionally or by design left out years of context. Whatever the motivation, its clear that the reporter, Douglas K. Daniel, paid no attention to the man behind the curtain. The Center for Public Integrity is one of many George Soros fronts. Soros pays the bills and his minions, whether they happen to work at the CPI or the Center for American Progress or Media Matters or wherever, dance to his tune. And Soros has made it his lifes work to bring down the Bush administration. He says its the central focus of my life. Do you think people paid to to research by a man with that stated mission are likely to deliver unbiased findings?
Douglas K. Daniel either doesnt know this or didnt do his due diligence and report the full facts to his readers. Whatever the underlying issues are with his reporting, its dishonest to pass off press releases as journalism. He earns a fail.
Why is it liberal organizations always give them selves false names? I mean you don't even have to get past their name to see the first lie they tell.
In my experience it is always the people who say "trust me i would never lie to you" who are the ones you have to suspect the most... the truly honest people usually never think they have to tell you that
Sticking in the word “nonprofit” is supposed to make people think they are objective and honest. It looks like they took every statement of Bush’s they disagreed with and counted it as a lie. Even if some statements by the administration were mistaken, they weren’t “lies” unless the speaker knew they were inaccurate at the time.