Interested in HDTV? Please Freepmail (works best) me if you would like your name added to the HDTV ping list.
The pinged subjects will be those of HDTV technology, satellite/cable HD, OTA (over the air with various roof top and indoor antennas) HD reception. Broadcast specials, Blu-ray/HD-DVD, and any and all subjects relating to HD.
Las Vegas Dave
To: ADemocratNoMore; advertising guy; aft_lizard; AJMaXx; Alice in Wonderland; american colleen; ...
Pinging the HDTV list.....
HDTV pings
2 posted on
01/23/2008 2:20:52 PM PST by
Las Vegas Dave
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, June 2004.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
But.........is it true that the new Mitsubishi Lazer TV, that is supposed to be out within the year, will make all the HDTV’s obsolete?
3 posted on
01/23/2008 2:27:13 PM PST by
RC2
To: Las Vegas Dave
For a 1920×1080-pixel HDTV, that figure would reach 840 Gbytes/hour. Who ever thinks in Gbytes/hour, unless you're storing movies on a DVD? In more typical units, this is about 250 megabytes/second, which doesn't sound like a huge data flow. Surely, a small number of state-of-the-art DSP chips could easily handle this. I guess the FPGAs are used to provide a custom controller for said set of DSPs.
5 posted on
01/23/2008 2:32:48 PM PST by
AZLiberty
(President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
Interesting article. Let’s you know what the problems are.
My conerns are that some sub-standard video quality level will become the defacto standard. (Think iTunes.) And all this great engineering work will be for naught.
6 posted on
01/23/2008 2:40:20 PM PST by
tje
To: Las Vegas Dave
Designers have begun to apply dynamic image-processing algorithms in FPGAs to convert and map digital-video signals onto display panels. We've been doing this for a while now ...
8 posted on
01/23/2008 2:42:50 PM PST by
clamper1797
(I fear for our republic)
To: Las Vegas Dave
In addition to a variety of standard available ASSPs, designers are now using low-cost FPGAs with built-in features, such as DSP blocks, memories, microcontrollers, and differential interfaces, to leverage the rapid design cycle. Maybe some are ... we are not. FPGA's have a lot of un-used stuff in them. We re-use TVP, DDR2-3 DLL, PLL and memory controller modules with just a few tweaks and put them in a small footprint LV ASIC ... 4 months to tapeout ... much better
9 posted on
01/23/2008 2:48:53 PM PST by
clamper1797
(I fear for our republic)
To: Las Vegas Dave
display clean, smooth pictures on flat-panel HDTVs
For a second there it sounded like "clean, smooth, and flat-panel", like in no pixels that you can see make out on the screen and no scan-lines.
When will that ever happen?
12 posted on
01/23/2008 2:58:38 PM PST by
adorno
To: Las Vegas Dave
Piffle!
I've been saying the same thing for years...:)
13 posted on
01/23/2008 2:59:50 PM PST by
Sudetenland
(Mike Huckabee=Bill Clinton. Can we afford another Clinton in the White House...from either party?)
To: Las Vegas Dave
FPGAs are a wonderful thing - they are essentially an uncommitted sea of gates with routing resources. Let’s you put any kind of logic you like into them. They can as easily be used to build customer CPUs as implementing MPEG related algorithms.
The problem is that the larger FPGAs that are able to implement “interesting” functionality usually cost $50-$2000. So only the smallest devices are practical for things that get massed produced.
Application Specific ICs (ASICs) are usually a better answer for competitive applications like consumer electronics.
17 posted on
01/23/2008 4:32:11 PM PST by
fremont_steve
(Milpitas - a great place to be FROM!)
To: Las Vegas Dave
19 posted on
01/25/2008 5:44:29 PM PST by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson