Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zender500

Evolution is to me obviously true.

It also is pretty obvious that Woods Hole is being bigoted and irrational in this case. Furthermore, their attitude is antagonistic to the spirit of free, imaginative thinking which is necessary in science, as it is in many other areas of human affairs.

It is a shame that such as case ever arose, and that it now must be adjudicated in our clumsy, inefficient, wasteful, and uncertain legal system. As I tell youngsters, “If you simply do what is right in the first place, you will avoid most of life’s problems.”


12 posted on 01/24/2008 6:04:39 AM PST by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: docbnj

I’m firmly for evolution also and this case just stinks.

Abraham’s beliefs did not conflict with his work...even his statement’s don’t necessary conflict with evolutionary thinking. It’s well known that the eye evolved independently several times, I’m sure the same is true with the heart.


17 posted on 01/24/2008 6:42:59 AM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson