Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexuals 'Born That Way' and Erotic Sex Taught to 8th and 10th Graders Challenged by TMLC
thomasmore.org ^

Posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:10 PM PST by tpanther

ANN ARBOR, MI – In oral arguments last week, the Thomas More Law Center asked Maryland state circuit court judge William Rowan III to overturn a Maryland Board of Education ruling that approves of public schools in Montgomery County, Maryland, teaching 8th and 10th graders that homosexuality is innate—meaning they are born that way. The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.

Montgomery educators were forced to defend their new sex curriculum that promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and transvestitism despite strong opposition from several pro-family groups. The controversial new curriculum was adopted as a result of pressure by homosexual advocacy groups.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Maryland; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: birthdefects; diversity; gays; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; montgomerycounty; publicschools; schoolboard; thomasmore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:14 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tpanther

“The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.”

And then some teachers demonstrate intercourse with their students.


2 posted on 01/25/2008 1:11:33 PM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.

Anyone who considers this "erotic" is probably psychotic.

3 posted on 01/25/2008 1:14:29 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Montgomery educators were forced to defend their new sex curriculum that promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and transvestitism despite strong opposition from several pro-family groups.

Who cares what the pro-family groups want, it doesn't matter, get with the program, this is the twenty first century afterall, times have changed, ANYTHING goes, it's all about diversity............/sarcasm off now

4 posted on 01/25/2008 1:19:23 PM PST by rockabyebaby (PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR INFIDEL STEPHENJOHNBANKER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

Ah, yes. Male-on-male anal sodomy. Such a sublime and beautiful act of natural love!


5 posted on 01/25/2008 1:20:39 PM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

Ir doesn’t really matter.
By nature OR nurture, Homosexuals are biological, genetic, natural, sexual and sociological, defectives.

Homosexuality, by it’s very definition *is* bestiality.
In and of the nature of beasts.

Without mores, feral in it’s animal carnality and Darwinian
desires, it is a regression to less than a human spirit.


6 posted on 01/25/2008 1:24:59 PM PST by DGHoodini (Silent tears, bleeding heart...Well our prima donna plies her art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

and for your Term Paper which counts as 1/4 of your grade, each of you will be assigned a Same Sex partner. Those who refuse will be failed and their puppies killed.


7 posted on 01/25/2008 1:28:07 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

I’ve concluded that they’re now using “erotic” to describe what normal people call “perverted.” I think this says something about the person who chose the adjective ...


8 posted on 01/25/2008 1:32:45 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Anyone who considers this "erotic" is probably psychotic.

C'mon . . . heteros do this kind of stuff, too.

9 posted on 01/25/2008 1:34:49 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
heteros do this kind of stuff, too.

Relevance? Ick is ick.

10 posted on 01/25/2008 1:37:33 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
In oral arguments last week

OOOOO poor start or very funny.

11 posted on 01/25/2008 1:45:30 PM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

>> Relevance? Ick is ick.

Between married heterosexuals — I really don’t get the “ick”.

H


12 posted on 01/25/2008 1:48:17 PM PST by SnakeDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

“By nature OR nurture, Homosexuals are biological, genetic, natural, sexual and sociological, defectives”

Well put.


13 posted on 01/25/2008 1:49:19 PM PST by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Hemorrhage

Folks have different views, of course. We can be sure that the Maryland Public Schools don’t take the slightest interest in the activities of married heterosexuals.


15 posted on 01/25/2008 1:52:20 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hemorrhage

Sorry. I do.


16 posted on 01/25/2008 1:54:50 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Relevance? Ick is ick.

The relevance being this: it might not be your cup of tea, but it certainly is "erotic," and those who choose to engage in such things aren't "psychotic" because they do so. Methinks you're failing to consider the definition of "erotic," friend.

17 posted on 01/25/2008 1:54:50 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Probably true — but the activities themselves are not the problem. The context is the problem (outside of marriage, homosexual, etc.) — in addition to the activities being introduced to 8th graders.

H


18 posted on 01/25/2008 1:55:41 PM PST by SnakeDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

>> Sorry. I do.

Gladly — my wife disagrees.

H


19 posted on 01/25/2008 1:56:21 PM PST by SnakeDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

I weep for those practicing incest, pedophilia, beastiality, and necrophilia. When will the world accept these alternative and loving lifestyles. Do we have to wait for hollywood to do the marketing first? SARC


20 posted on 01/25/2008 1:57:10 PM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

(Per Dictionary.com)
Erotic:
1. arousing or satisfying sexual desire
2. of, pertaining to, or treating of sexual love; amatory
3. subject to or marked by strong sexual desire.

I chose “psychotic” to rhyme with erotic, understanding that it’s exaggerated.


21 posted on 01/25/2008 1:59:36 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hemorrhage
in addition to the activities being introduced to 8th graders.

Well, anal sex with 8th graders is what the people behind this program find erotic. However, we don't all have to agree.

22 posted on 01/25/2008 2:00:46 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
Ah, yes. Male-on-male anal sodomy. Such a sublime and beautiful act of natural love!

Is it really homosexual men driving this agenda? I seem to notice the primary and secondary teaching profession has been taken over by women. I also seem to see a lot of lesbians taking the lead in complaining about the white male power structure. When the "fisting" crowd of teachers got caught in Newton High School, Massachusetts, it was a lesbian leading the charge.

23 posted on 01/25/2008 2:02:47 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (<I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
“The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.”

I'd think oral then anal sex might be better. But that's just me.

24 posted on 01/25/2008 2:08:06 PM PST by polymuser (Just darn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Montgomery educators were forced to defend their new sex curriculum that promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and transvestitism

What? They left out bestiality and necrophilia!

Bigots!

25 posted on 01/25/2008 2:08:31 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.

So you need a different type of condom for that? Are they like golf clubs? Should I bring a caddy?

Something tells me their definition of "erotic sex taught to students" is a pretty loose one, like the people who are offended by pencil-drawing bra ads and write to the newspaper to complain about the "hardcore pornography my children were subjected to."

26 posted on 01/25/2008 2:09:33 PM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist (The top1% of income earners earn 17% of the income, but pay 39% of the income taxes. "Fair share?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

You’d think that having to wear protective clothing because of legitimate concern that your partner is the biological equivalent of a toxic waste dump would be a little anti-erotic.


27 posted on 01/25/2008 2:13:10 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

.

Students are to bring fudge and bananas for tomorrow’s treat during the lesson.


28 posted on 01/25/2008 2:14:34 PM PST by polymuser (Just darn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist

The boys in the class had just better make sure not to make any gestures with a finger that could be mistaken for a gun, which would get them expelled.


29 posted on 01/25/2008 2:18:02 PM PST by polymuser (Just darn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: polymuser
The boys in the class had just better make sure not to make any gestures with a finger that could be mistaken for a gun, which would get them expelled.

But what if they're playing Fashion Police? Would the expulsion be homophobic? :)

30 posted on 01/25/2008 2:20:18 PM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist (The top1% of income earners earn 17% of the income, but pay 39% of the income taxes. "Fair share?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

They are trying to undermine the definition of being a man


32 posted on 01/25/2008 2:31:20 PM PST by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist

Interesting...

it’s somehow important to teach 8th graders about all the sex out there, different positions, preferences, et al...

meanwhile we can’t have Christian principles or GOD forbid the word Christmas on the school’s calendar...

and meanwhile we’re losing ground to the rest of the world in math, science etc.


33 posted on 01/25/2008 2:38:07 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

That’s why my children will never set foot inside a government school.


34 posted on 01/25/2008 2:39:32 PM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist (The top1% of income earners earn 17% of the income, but pay 39% of the income taxes. "Fair share?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

It’s all sickening. HOME SCHOOL FOLKS, home school!


35 posted on 01/25/2008 2:53:09 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

ping


36 posted on 01/25/2008 2:53:32 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
I don't know how people get to be homosexuals, but I don't remember ever making a decision one way or the other to date boys. I just went out with this guy on the football team who asked me and I was off and running.

As I recall he was a pretty good kisser, so I thought maybe I'd find anopther and I did. Shhh, he in the other room.

37 posted on 01/25/2008 2:56:23 PM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine

LOL!


38 posted on 01/25/2008 3:00:01 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
It’s all sickening. HOME SCHOOL FOLKS, home school!

HOME SCHOOL FOLKS, not HOMO SCHOOL! [there, fixed it]

39 posted on 01/25/2008 3:03:15 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

The controversial new curriculum was adopted as a result of pressure by homosexual advocacy groups.


Repeat LOUID and OFTEN..........................


40 posted on 01/25/2008 3:06:26 PM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
“Anyone who considers this “erotic” is probably psychotic.”

Great, my precise thoughts...reminds me of the joke: Little Red Riding Hood, is stopped on her way to Grandma’s house, by the Bad Wolfe, who exclaims I am going to eat you...to which came the reply, mygad, don’t anyone **** anymore....hope I don't get excommunicated..

41 posted on 01/25/2008 3:07:09 PM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thinking

That’s very funny and appropriate to the topic.


42 posted on 01/25/2008 3:39:26 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Oh, gee, thanks...


43 posted on 01/25/2008 4:26:43 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tpanther; All

this policy dispute is but a symptom of a larger problem - the erroneous and ingrained conviction of the public school industry that it has a mandate for the complete social engineering of society and to do so on values of its own choosing

when God and prayer were chased out of public schools those events were sold, to the public, on the idea that schools should be agnostic on personal moral issues (not for or against)

people of deep faith did not believe that agnosticism was the goal of the victors

year by year that belief has increasingly proven right


44 posted on 01/25/2008 4:51:20 PM PST by Wuli (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Indeed, the left wing secular regressive Godless liberal hate America/Christian/conservative class envy socialists have infiltrated and hijacked media, govt, law, education, medicine et al and we as a nation BETTER wake up!


45 posted on 01/25/2008 5:47:55 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

Well, you’re right, it isn’t just the male perverts. It’s the females as well. And neither of them could succeed at this if it lots of heterosexual lefties weren’t supporting them. The whole anti-family crowd is pushing this agenda.


46 posted on 01/25/2008 7:48:59 PM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

Your tax dollars at work.
I downloaded a pdf file from the World Health Organization (AIDS and men who have sex with men UNAIDS Technical Update, May, 2000, a62375_eng.pdf). One phrase caught my eye: “Sex between men frequently involves anal intercourse, which carries a very high risk of HIV transmission for the receptive partner, and a significant risk, though a lesser one, for the insertive partner.” I wonder if the kids are taught any of this.
Here’s something from the CDC, March 8, 2004:
“Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk for multiple sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, hepatitis B and hepatitis A. Numerous reports document high rates of STDs among MSM that appear to be associated with a resurgence in unsafe sexual practices.”
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/msm/
I predict that the gay rights movement will continue to see gains over the next, say, 20 years, but not in the long run. The life style is simply not healthy or safe.


47 posted on 01/26/2008 8:10:04 AM PST by beejaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beejaa

Meanwhile the psychotic libs promote unsafe sexual lifestyles and call it a health issue in public school and parents have ZERO rights to stop it.


48 posted on 01/26/2008 8:53:25 AM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

Birth defect???


49 posted on 01/26/2008 8:55:42 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

The difference between a rectal and oral thermometer?

The taste!


50 posted on 01/26/2008 8:57:21 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson