Skip to comments.Homosexuals 'Born That Way' and Erotic Sex Taught to 8th and 10th Graders Challenged by TMLC
Posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:10 PM PST by tpanther
ANN ARBOR, MI In oral arguments last week, the Thomas More Law Center asked Maryland state circuit court judge William Rowan III to overturn a Maryland Board of Education ruling that approves of public schools in Montgomery County, Maryland, teaching 8th and 10th graders that homosexuality is innatemeaning they are born that way. The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.
Montgomery educators were forced to defend their new sex curriculum that promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and transvestitism despite strong opposition from several pro-family groups. The controversial new curriculum was adopted as a result of pressure by homosexual advocacy groups.
“The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.”
And then some teachers demonstrate intercourse with their students.
Anyone who considers this "erotic" is probably psychotic.
Who cares what the pro-family groups want, it doesn't matter, get with the program, this is the twenty first century afterall, times have changed, ANYTHING goes, it's all about diversity............/sarcasm off now
Ah, yes. Male-on-male anal sodomy. Such a sublime and beautiful act of natural love!
Ir doesn’t really matter.
By nature OR nurture, Homosexuals are biological, genetic, natural, sexual and sociological, defectives.
Homosexuality, by it’s very definition *is* bestiality.
In and of the nature of beasts.
Without mores, feral in it’s animal carnality and Darwinian
desires, it is a regression to less than a human spirit.
and for your Term Paper which counts as 1/4 of your grade, each of you will be assigned a Same Sex partner. Those who refuse will be failed and their puppies killed.
I’ve concluded that they’re now using “erotic” to describe what normal people call “perverted.” I think this says something about the person who chose the adjective ...
C'mon . . . heteros do this kind of stuff, too.
Relevance? Ick is ick.
OOOOO poor start or very funny.
>> Relevance? Ick is ick.
Between married heterosexuals — I really don’t get the “ick”.
“By nature OR nurture, Homosexuals are biological, genetic, natural, sexual and sociological, defectives”
Folks have different views, of course. We can be sure that the Maryland Public Schools don’t take the slightest interest in the activities of married heterosexuals.
Sorry. I do.
The relevance being this: it might not be your cup of tea, but it certainly is "erotic," and those who choose to engage in such things aren't "psychotic" because they do so. Methinks you're failing to consider the definition of "erotic," friend.
Probably true — but the activities themselves are not the problem. The context is the problem (outside of marriage, homosexual, etc.) — in addition to the activities being introduced to 8th graders.
>> Sorry. I do.
Gladly — my wife disagrees.
I weep for those practicing incest, pedophilia, beastiality, and necrophilia. When will the world accept these alternative and loving lifestyles. Do we have to wait for hollywood to do the marketing first? SARC
1. arousing or satisfying sexual desire
2. of, pertaining to, or treating of sexual love; amatory
3. subject to or marked by strong sexual desire.
I chose “psychotic” to rhyme with erotic, understanding that it’s exaggerated.
Well, anal sex with 8th graders is what the people behind this program find erotic. However, we don't all have to agree.
Is it really homosexual men driving this agenda? I seem to notice the primary and secondary teaching profession has been taken over by women. I also seem to see a lot of lesbians taking the lead in complaining about the white male power structure. When the "fisting" crowd of teachers got caught in Newton High School, Massachusetts, it was a lesbian leading the charge.
I'd think oral then anal sex might be better. But that's just me.
What? They left out bestiality and necrophilia!
So you need a different type of condom for that? Are they like golf clubs? Should I bring a caddy?
Something tells me their definition of "erotic sex taught to students" is a pretty loose one, like the people who are offended by pencil-drawing bra ads and write to the newspaper to complain about the "hardcore pornography my children were subjected to."
You’d think that having to wear protective clothing because of legitimate concern that your partner is the biological equivalent of a toxic waste dump would be a little anti-erotic.
Students are to bring fudge and bananas for tomorrow’s treat during the lesson.
The boys in the class had just better make sure not to make any gestures with a finger that could be mistaken for a gun, which would get them expelled.
But what if they're playing Fashion Police? Would the expulsion be homophobic? :)
They are trying to undermine the definition of being a man
it’s somehow important to teach 8th graders about all the sex out there, different positions, preferences, et al...
meanwhile we can’t have Christian principles or GOD forbid the word Christmas on the school’s calendar...
and meanwhile we’re losing ground to the rest of the world in math, science etc.
That’s why my children will never set foot inside a government school.
It’s all sickening. HOME SCHOOL FOLKS, home school!
As I recall he was a pretty good kisser, so I thought maybe I'd find anopther and I did. Shhh, he in the other room.
HOME SCHOOL FOLKS, not HOMO SCHOOL! [there, fixed it]
The controversial new curriculum was adopted as a result of pressure by homosexual advocacy groups.
Great, my precise thoughts...reminds me of the joke: Little Red Riding Hood, is stopped on her way to Grandma’s house, by the Bad Wolfe, who exclaims I am going to eat you...to which came the reply, mygad, don’t anyone **** anymore....hope I don't get excommunicated..
That’s very funny and appropriate to the topic.
Oh, gee, thanks...
this policy dispute is but a symptom of a larger problem - the erroneous and ingrained conviction of the public school industry that it has a mandate for the complete social engineering of society and to do so on values of its own choosing
when God and prayer were chased out of public schools those events were sold, to the public, on the idea that schools should be agnostic on personal moral issues (not for or against)
people of deep faith did not believe that agnosticism was the goal of the victors
year by year that belief has increasingly proven right
Indeed, the left wing secular regressive Godless liberal hate America/Christian/conservative class envy socialists have infiltrated and hijacked media, govt, law, education, medicine et al and we as a nation BETTER wake up!
Well, you’re right, it isn’t just the male perverts. It’s the females as well. And neither of them could succeed at this if it lots of heterosexual lefties weren’t supporting them. The whole anti-family crowd is pushing this agenda.
Your tax dollars at work.
I downloaded a pdf file from the World Health Organization (AIDS and men who have sex with men UNAIDS Technical Update, May, 2000, a62375_eng.pdf). One phrase caught my eye: “Sex between men frequently involves anal intercourse, which carries a very high risk of HIV transmission for the receptive partner, and a significant risk, though a lesser one, for the insertive partner.” I wonder if the kids are taught any of this.
Here’s something from the CDC, March 8, 2004:
“Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk for multiple sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, hepatitis B and hepatitis A. Numerous reports document high rates of STDs among MSM that appear to be associated with a resurgence in unsafe sexual practices.”
I predict that the gay rights movement will continue to see gains over the next, say, 20 years, but not in the long run. The life style is simply not healthy or safe.
Meanwhile the psychotic libs promote unsafe sexual lifestyles and call it a health issue in public school and parents have ZERO rights to stop it.
The difference between a rectal and oral thermometer?