Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexuals 'Born That Way' and Erotic Sex Taught to 8th and 10th Graders Challenged by TMLC
thomasmore.org ^

Posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:10 PM PST by tpanther

ANN ARBOR, MI – In oral arguments last week, the Thomas More Law Center asked Maryland state circuit court judge William Rowan III to overturn a Maryland Board of Education ruling that approves of public schools in Montgomery County, Maryland, teaching 8th and 10th graders that homosexuality is innate—meaning they are born that way. The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.

Montgomery educators were forced to defend their new sex curriculum that promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and transvestitism despite strong opposition from several pro-family groups. The controversial new curriculum was adopted as a result of pressure by homosexual advocacy groups.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Maryland; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: birthdefects; diversity; gays; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; montgomerycounty; publicschools; schoolboard; thomasmore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:14 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tpanther

“The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.”

And then some teachers demonstrate intercourse with their students.


2 posted on 01/25/2008 1:11:33 PM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.

Anyone who considers this "erotic" is probably psychotic.

3 posted on 01/25/2008 1:14:29 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Montgomery educators were forced to defend their new sex curriculum that promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and transvestitism despite strong opposition from several pro-family groups.

Who cares what the pro-family groups want, it doesn't matter, get with the program, this is the twenty first century afterall, times have changed, ANYTHING goes, it's all about diversity............/sarcasm off now

4 posted on 01/25/2008 1:19:23 PM PST by rockabyebaby (PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR INFIDEL STEPHENJOHNBANKER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

Ah, yes. Male-on-male anal sodomy. Such a sublime and beautiful act of natural love!


5 posted on 01/25/2008 1:20:39 PM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

Ir doesn’t really matter.
By nature OR nurture, Homosexuals are biological, genetic, natural, sexual and sociological, defectives.

Homosexuality, by it’s very definition *is* bestiality.
In and of the nature of beasts.

Without mores, feral in it’s animal carnality and Darwinian
desires, it is a regression to less than a human spirit.


6 posted on 01/25/2008 1:24:59 PM PST by DGHoodini (Silent tears, bleeding heart...Well our prima donna plies her art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

and for your Term Paper which counts as 1/4 of your grade, each of you will be assigned a Same Sex partner. Those who refuse will be failed and their puppies killed.


7 posted on 01/25/2008 1:28:07 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

I’ve concluded that they’re now using “erotic” to describe what normal people call “perverted.” I think this says something about the person who chose the adjective ...


8 posted on 01/25/2008 1:32:45 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Anyone who considers this "erotic" is probably psychotic.

C'mon . . . heteros do this kind of stuff, too.

9 posted on 01/25/2008 1:34:49 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
heteros do this kind of stuff, too.

Relevance? Ick is ick.

10 posted on 01/25/2008 1:37:33 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
In oral arguments last week

OOOOO poor start or very funny.

11 posted on 01/25/2008 1:45:30 PM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

>> Relevance? Ick is ick.

Between married heterosexuals — I really don’t get the “ick”.

H


12 posted on 01/25/2008 1:48:17 PM PST by SnakeDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

“By nature OR nurture, Homosexuals are biological, genetic, natural, sexual and sociological, defectives”

Well put.


13 posted on 01/25/2008 1:49:19 PM PST by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Hemorrhage

Folks have different views, of course. We can be sure that the Maryland Public Schools don’t take the slightest interest in the activities of married heterosexuals.


15 posted on 01/25/2008 1:52:20 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hemorrhage

Sorry. I do.


16 posted on 01/25/2008 1:54:50 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Relevance? Ick is ick.

The relevance being this: it might not be your cup of tea, but it certainly is "erotic," and those who choose to engage in such things aren't "psychotic" because they do so. Methinks you're failing to consider the definition of "erotic," friend.

17 posted on 01/25/2008 1:54:50 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Probably true — but the activities themselves are not the problem. The context is the problem (outside of marriage, homosexual, etc.) — in addition to the activities being introduced to 8th graders.

H


18 posted on 01/25/2008 1:55:41 PM PST by SnakeDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

>> Sorry. I do.

Gladly — my wife disagrees.

H


19 posted on 01/25/2008 1:56:21 PM PST by SnakeDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

I weep for those practicing incest, pedophilia, beastiality, and necrophilia. When will the world accept these alternative and loving lifestyles. Do we have to wait for hollywood to do the marketing first? SARC


20 posted on 01/25/2008 1:57:10 PM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson