Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet the Press, Dissembling, and More (Levin Debunks Romney role in Iowa Rumor)
The Corner at National Review ^ | January 27, 2008 | Mark Levin

Posted on 01/27/2008 10:18:57 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT

The hard-driving Tim Russert blew it. He allowed McCain to slip away with his dishonest characterization of Romney's statement, i.e., Romney never said he favored a specific time for withdrawal. McCain read the first part of the quote but not the second part, where Romney would veto a congressional time table. By now, everyone who is carefully following this knows that McCain's allegation is flatly false.

...

On another note, a rumor is making the rounds that Fred Thompson will endorse John McCain tomorrow.

I checked with somebody extremely close to the situation. Fred said the other day that he won't endorse for now, and he is not endorsing for now. I suspect this rumor is being leaked by the McCain camp, which was the source of the earlier rumor that Fred was planning on throwing his support behind McCain if he didn't score well in Iowa.

(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: marklevin; rds; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Prophet in the wilderness
Wish Fred could get back in the race ...

I admire and love Fred also.

But it was obvious 12 months ago before he even got into the race that Fred was tired and not up to the task of running for President.

He had to be dragged into it for heaven's sake, and only did it finally in Sept. because friends kept badgering him.

Fred can still be a great conservative motivator, but he is past his prime.

21 posted on 01/28/2008 12:31:50 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Well duh, Russert loves McCain for the same reason he loves Obama. They all agree on the issues.


22 posted on 01/28/2008 1:24:25 AM PST by Def Conservative (Why vote for McCain when all of his legislation could be signed in an Obama White House anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
RUSSERT - Mr. Potato Head!
23 posted on 01/28/2008 2:01:23 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rock&RollRepublican

f nothing else Willard will buy the nomination.

All the money in the world can’t buy a winner if you don’t have the message, the integrity, and the personality to deliver that message.even Ross Perot fell flat, although he swiped enough votes to defeat GHWB.

YUP you are correct sir, and MITT, he doesn’t have to buy anything...he’s already got all the important

shakers and doers on board the MITT EXPRESS...

1. RUSH
2. ANNIE
3. LAURA
and now it looks like
4. MARK is aboard..also


24 posted on 01/28/2008 3:52:06 AM PST by flat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
I support gun rights, but don't have an NRA membership. What does that make me?

Either lazy, cheap or stupid. Take your pick.

Sounds like a demonRAT saying that they "support the troops".

If you don't support the NRA with your money, to say you "support" guns rights are just meaningless words.

BTW, guns don't have rights, people have the right to own guns.

Join the NRA, and then post that you "support" the right of people to own and carry guns.

25 posted on 01/28/2008 4:57:42 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

No so called Republican has done more to undercut the conservative agenda than John McCain. Though Chuck Hagel, McCain’s Mini-Me, has been comical.


26 posted on 01/28/2008 5:01:39 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Number1FredHeadSwitch2Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bob; Terpfen
I can't find any quotes where Romney uses the words "life-long member". I found one reference in WND where they say he said he was a "life member", which is the correct term:
Last August, with a presidential bid clearly in focus, Romney joined the NRA, signing up not just as a supporter but a "life member."

27 posted on 01/28/2008 6:11:10 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I can't find any quotes where Romney uses the words "life-long member".

The direct quote is is this blog post: Blog quote

Stephanopoulos: When did you join the NRA?

Mitt Romney: Within the last year and I signed up for a lifelong membership. I think they’re doing good things and I believe in supporting the right to bear arms.

And is reported on in this Boston Globe article: Globe article
Speaking on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos," Romney said he signed up for a life long membership "within the last year."

28 posted on 01/28/2008 7:23:06 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Zzzzzzz.

Have better things to discuss than whether not one truly shares a belief in something by forking over money for a membership card.


29 posted on 01/28/2008 7:37:26 AM PST by Terpfen (It's your fault, not Pelosi's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Zevonismymuse
>>>>>And I like candidates who use their their personal wealth to finance their campaigns.

Guess you love Bloomberg and Corzine. LOL

30 posted on 01/28/2008 7:56:13 AM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rock&RollRepublican
>>>>>All the money in the world can't buy a winner if you don't have the message, the integrity, and the personality to deliver that message.

Mike Bloomberg and John Corzine prove you wrong.

And with the weak field of candidates this time around Romney could come out on top. Even though his meaasge is trumped up, his integrity is in the toilet and his personality is phony.

31 posted on 01/28/2008 7:59:52 AM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

McCains sudden rise was most likely dirty politics. Dirty coming from the “straight talkeR” whos has said he would never nominate an Alito for SCOTUS because Alito wears his conservatism on his sleeve.

JOHN MC CAIN DIRTBAG WELL KNOWN TURNCOAT.


32 posted on 01/28/2008 8:04:24 AM PST by dforest (Don't even ask me to vote for McCain, Rudy, or Huckster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob

Thanks, I always thought that sounded funny.


33 posted on 01/28/2008 8:06:23 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Have better things to discuss than whether not one truly shares a belief in something by forking over money for a membership card.

Major difference between "sharing a belief" and supporting.

One is an idea, the other requires real, tangible action.

But, like the demonRATs, it's the purity of your intentions that count.

34 posted on 01/28/2008 8:55:06 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
"Wish Fred could get back in the race and kick the Snot out of McCain and win the nomination........"


I'd pay a lot of good money just to see Fred beat the snot outta him!
I'd give my first born to see him win the nomination.


"I guess we are realizing that, we don't realize what we have until it's gone."


Ain't it the truth...

35 posted on 01/28/2008 12:48:19 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Guess you love Bloomberg and Corzine. LOL

I don't care for their politics but I do not hold it against them they hey are able to invest in their own campaigns. I think people should "put their money where their mouth is."

36 posted on 01/28/2008 2:23:14 PM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Zevonismymuse

Its not a matter of holding it against them.

Its a matter of buying an election.

That is called, political elitism.


37 posted on 01/28/2008 2:28:56 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Its a matter of buying an election.

I would rather someone spend their own money than to be indebted to special interests. And in the end, it always takes more than money. Ask Steve Forbes and Bill Simon.

38 posted on 01/28/2008 2:44:12 PM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson