Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Signs Fiscal 2008 Defense Budget Legislation Into Law
American Forces Press Service ^ | Donna Miles

Posted on 01/29/2008 3:24:00 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Jan. 28, 2008 – President Bush signed the long-delayed and sometimes-contentious fiscal 2008 National Defense Authorization Act into law today.

The Senate passed a $696 billion 2008 defense authorization bill Jan. 22. It includes a 3.5 percent military pay raise and provisions to improve health care and benefits for wounded troops and veterans.

“Today, I have signed into law H.R. 4986, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008,” Bush said in a statement released by the White House. “The act authorizes funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, for military construction, and for national security-related energy programs.”

The fiscal 2008 defense budget has been laden with challenges, from Congress’ inclusion of non-defense-related earmarks to its insertion of controversial language regarding Iraq. Bush announced Dec. 28 that he wouldn’t sign the bill until it was revised.

Instead, the president signed an executive order authorizing a 3 percent military pay raise. The amount was 0.5 percent lower than the 3.5 percent rate provided for in the authorization act, but took effect Jan. 1.

All pays and incentives included in the authorization act will be retroactive to Jan. 1, a defense official said.

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino told reporters today Bush was gratified that Congress moved forward with the budget bill.

“He appreciates the cooperation of both House and Senate leaders to quickly address the concerns raised by the president over the Christmas holiday,” she said at the White House. “Congress passed the legislation swiftly, and that is a very good thing for our troops and the Iraqi people.”

The bill became law just a week before the next budget cycle begins as Bush sends his fiscal 2009 request to Capitol Hill. That budget proposal, along with a requested $70 billion in emergency war spending, is expected to be delivered to Congress Feb. 4.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman told reporters today the president plans to ask for $70 billion to fund the global war on terror, including operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, for the first months of fiscal 2009.

Related Sites:
Text of President's Statement


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; defense; democrats; frwn; fy2008; law; legislation; republicans

1 posted on 01/29/2008 3:24:03 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.

WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!

2 posted on 01/29/2008 3:24:58 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; All

Good, it took way too long to get the NDAA passed this year.

For those of you that are drilling reservists there is a provision in this that will affect your potential retirement pay at age 60. Before this was signed, you could only earn 90 “soft points” (weekend drills, corresspondence course points, membership points, etc.) per retirement year. That cap has been raised by this legislation to 130 per year (retroactive back to 1 OCT 07). So, for those not mobilization but still drilling, it is important that you take as many corresspondence courses or additional drill for points only. If you get the full amount of soft points plus any active duty (usually 14 days of AT), you could conceivably earned 144 points per year as a drilling reservist. That adds up quickly, and will affect the size of your reserve retirment check at age 60.

Thought I should pass that along to the Reserve Warriors.


3 posted on 01/29/2008 3:45:56 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson