Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has AT&T Lost Its Mind? A baffling proposal to filter the Internet.
Slate ^ | January 16, 2008 | Tim Wu

Posted on 01/29/2008 5:56:29 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: al baby

Well then, I bope so too!


21 posted on 01/29/2008 8:41:12 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

It can also be used as a way to secure exclusive content deals.


22 posted on 01/29/2008 10:17:58 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Excellent point.


23 posted on 01/29/2008 10:36:55 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: al baby

I bope my beeber wont get stuned. I’m series.


24 posted on 01/29/2008 10:40:00 PM PST by Vigilantcitizen (Gone fishin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Firstly, the email scanning is already happening, but not by the ISP. The investigative branches have strategically located taps on backbones now and have had for many years. Same with voice communication backbones.
I challenge you all to do your own investigation. You can start here:
http://home.hiwaay.net/~pspoole/echelon.html

Secondly, interception and monitoring can be done with little performance degradation, unlike 10 years ago. Backbone systems can replicate all traffic and mirror it to a monitoring port used by the monitoring system. As the monitoring system identifies traffic of interest, it dynamically creates access lists to block, throttle or drop traffic matching those parameters. This is a lower layer monitoring example. Using the same physical methods, the same thing could be done to filter content where the monitoring system actually disassembles packets and analyzes the payload for interesting data, and responds with whatever preset reaction the governing people decide such as forwarding and storing email, replacing or deleting data in the payload, redirecting the traffic, or whatever they wish.

My point is, you have been tapped for years already... all of us have. The real trick to this is to not worry about it and have faith that you are really not THAT interesting.

Now on to the business side of this...
AT&T would have many reasons for doing this including those listed above. Additionally, think about it this way... I use vonage for phone service. AT&T doesn’t want me to, they want me to use their phone service. Using the methods above, could they not make the quality of my vonage service suffer? Yes they can. I would be using their backbone to buy from their competitors.They could ultimately force me to either buy their phone service, or pay them an extra amount to make sure my vonage service works the way it is supposed to. They can prioritize my phone calls, or put them at the bottom of the list of important traffic, making my phone service suck. THIS is the most dangerous facet of this entire concept in my humble opinion. Just like I don’t go steal cars and rob banks, I don’t setup illegal file sharing stuff on my pc. I don’t want to go to jail or get sued. That doesn’t make privacy a non-issue with me, I really don’t want AT&T looking at anything I am doing, but at least I know I’m not going to jail because I control my behavior. This method of filtering can be abused on so many levels, it is absurd to think the consumer will accept it without revolt.
I just hope the courts see it our way as well.


25 posted on 01/30/2008 5:16:02 AM PST by FunkyZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Makes sense.

The record companies will sue AT&T for aiding and abeting IP theft.


26 posted on 01/30/2008 3:08:55 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

no, they already have immunity and the cases to give them that.

this is just an excuse to creat a “pay for flow” marketing.

the copyright thing is BS.


27 posted on 01/30/2008 3:13:11 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson