Skip to comments.
Broward County Florida Election Web Site: Precinct D001 has 109% Turnout Rate
Broward Supervisor of Elections Site ^
| 1/30/08
Posted on 01/30/2008 7:12:08 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

If you go to the site, click on the "green" precinct, you see that the Broward SOE is reporting a 109.68% turnout rate for that area of Broward.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: broward; election2008; elections; florida; truthfilemccain; voterfraud; voters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-95 next last
Is this just a computer glitch? I don't think this is an evil conspiracy or anything....the Broward SOE seems to be a pretty fair lady. Much better than the one before her.
To: SoFloFreeper
The state slogan for Florida election officials should just be changed to DUH.
2
posted on
01/30/2008 7:13:20 AM PST
by
MoMagic
To: SoFloFreeper
How can it be 109%?
What happened to 100%?
3
posted on
01/30/2008 7:13:54 AM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: nmh
when was there ever 100% turnout? statewide I think they were saying 40-50%.
4
posted on
01/30/2008 7:15:00 AM PST
by
libbylu
(Mitten I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR MCCAIN OR HUCK..THEY CALLED ME RACIST/BIGOT)
To: nmh
Independents voting in the closed primaries in Florida? Wonder who that favored? /s
5
posted on
01/30/2008 7:15:30 AM PST
by
truthluva
("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking" - JC Watts)
To: nmh
It's not electoral fraud.
Oh, no.
Not here.
Nevah hoppon, mon!
Nothing to see, here. Move along.
To: SoFloFreeper
1020 Votes Cast
930 Registered Voters
It could be possible provisional ballots by people who recently moved and hadn’t changed their voter registration? Still, anything close to 100% is way beyond normal turn out.
7
posted on
01/30/2008 7:15:54 AM PST
by
mnehring
(Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
To: SoFloFreeper
In certain areas of Philadelphia and St. Louis, local “Get Out The Vote” organizers would be fired for such a low percentage.
8
posted on
01/30/2008 7:16:53 AM PST
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: SoFloFreeper
I don't think this is an evil conspiracy or anythingWhat choo mean, it ain't no conspiracy? The voters were suppressed. It shoulda been at least 125%.
9
posted on
01/30/2008 7:17:10 AM PST
by
San Jacinto
(Three dangers to guard against: Osama, Obama, and Chelsea's Momma!!!)
To: truthluva
Just can’t imagine but I’ll take a WAG,
could it have been squishy,
drum roll,
MC PAIN?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ?
10
posted on
01/30/2008 7:17:14 AM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: SoFloFreeper
who won? wonder if there werw any big tour busses anywhere near the polls a la NH.
11
posted on
01/30/2008 7:18:54 AM PST
by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: SoFloFreeper
12
posted on
01/30/2008 7:21:54 AM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: SoFloFreeper
Ballots cast: 1020. Registered voters: 930
I understand what you're pointing out and it should be checked into...but it's a difference of 90 votes. Hardly result changing.
To: Red Badger
14
posted on
01/30/2008 7:23:13 AM PST
by
truthluva
("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking" - JC Watts)
To: SoFloFreeper
Several precincts in Detoit had 106% turnout in 2004.
Nothing to see here.
15
posted on
01/30/2008 7:23:20 AM PST
by
TonyInOhio
(Looks like I need to brush up on my Spanish.)
To: nmh
“How can it be 109%?
What happened to 100%?”
100% is impossible as well.
Even 60% would be almost impossible.
Which means there was major cheating going on in that area.
To: tsmith130
an error rate approaching 10% is unsat in any endeavor.
17
posted on
01/30/2008 7:24:16 AM PST
by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: SoFloFreeper
I’ll go with computer glitch...but it’s Broward- anything is possible.
18
posted on
01/30/2008 7:25:09 AM PST
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: camle
McCain won handily in that county, but he had a decided lead amongst early and absentee voters as well.
19
posted on
01/30/2008 7:25:39 AM PST
by
skr
(How majestic is Thy Name, O Lord, and how mighty are Thy Works!)
To: camle
I completely agree and as I said, it should be investigated. I’m just saying that this will not change the outcome of Florida.
To: skr
near as I can figger, HRC won by a couple of hundred vites (500+ to 200ish) for the O man.
21
posted on
01/30/2008 7:27:07 AM PST
by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: SoFloFreeper
Did anyone contact anyone in the media, or Rush or Hannity? Just a thought.
Maybe she has an explanation?
22
posted on
01/30/2008 7:27:49 AM PST
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("When you can't make them see the light; make them feel the heat." President Ronald Reagan)
To: tsmith130
Ballots cast: 1020. Registered voters: 930 I understand what you're pointing out and it should be checked into...but it's a difference of 90 votes. Hardly result changing. I'm not one for throwing out the results, although I think perhaps it could be indicative of voter fraud/tampering/whatever word you want to attribute to it. I would have a difficult time assuming, however, that this was the only place that voter manipulation occurred....but I have no solution. I guess I'm just mildly to MODERATELY disturbed that this may have occurred...emphasis on the MODERATE - haha
23
posted on
01/30/2008 7:32:24 AM PST
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("When you can't make them see the light; make them feel the heat." President Ronald Reagan)
To: SoFloFreeper
The first time Hillary ran in NY, one section of NYC had a 100% turn-out. (All for her, of course.) Unbelievable. That area had never had a stat like that. That is why I don’t want her the nominee. What her machine can do for voter fraud is my biggest fear. Get her out NOW!
24
posted on
01/30/2008 7:32:39 AM PST
by
Exit148
(Founder of the Loose Change Club. Every nickle and dime counts!!)
To: tsmith130
It’s more than 90 votes, ‘cause there’s no way the real turnout was 100%.
25
posted on
01/30/2008 7:39:35 AM PST
by
eclecticEel
(oh well, Hunter 2012 anyone?)
To: SoFloFreeper
This is smack dab in the middle of north Lauderdale, around Commercial Blvd west of Federal Highway. It's overwhelmingly Democratic. Check out the precinct's individual vote tallies and you'll see that 781 people voted in the Dem primary while only 178 voted in the GOP primary. McCain got 60 of those votes versus 43 for Romney. (Hillary got 509 versus 163 for Obama, FWIW.)
http://enr2.clarityelections.com/Default.aspx?page=R&c=broward&eid=270&lid=1&ref=false
Nothing to see here.
26
posted on
01/30/2008 7:51:05 AM PST
by
King of Florida
(A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
To: SoFloFreeper
109% turnout? Hmmmm..... I wasn’t the brightest math student, but I *think* there is a problem here.
27
posted on
01/30/2008 7:53:20 AM PST
by
TexasRepublic
(Islam is a mental disorder)
To: King of Florida
28
posted on
01/30/2008 7:53:28 AM PST
by
King of Florida
(A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
To: SoFloFreeper
Remember 2000 - Broward is perhaps the most crooked of all
29
posted on
01/30/2008 7:54:52 AM PST
by
elpadre
To: SoFloFreeper
What keeps absentees votes being counted twice? Once by absentee and once in person? Who checks that?
30
posted on
01/30/2008 7:55:12 AM PST
by
Blogger
(Propheteuon.com)
To: truthluva
“Independents voting in the closed primaries in Florida? Wonder who that favored?”
My understanding it that independets could vote, but only because they were able to cast votes on ballot initiatives. I have nothing specific.
31
posted on
01/30/2008 7:57:19 AM PST
by
Preachin'
(I stand with many voters who will never vote for a pro abortion candidate.)
To: SoFloFreeper
Is this just a computer glitch? Yeah, computers never could do arithmetic accurately. /s
32
posted on
01/30/2008 8:02:56 AM PST
by
386wt
(Be free and don't die!)
To: Preachin'
Your understanding is wrong.
33
posted on
01/30/2008 8:03:27 AM PST
by
gruna
To: Preachin'
Do they allow voters to change from independent to Republican at the poll? Do they have election day voter registration?
To: Preachin'
Independents were allowed to vote; however, their ballots should have only had the initiative and any local races, not the presidential preference.
35
posted on
01/30/2008 8:05:41 AM PST
by
Mellon
To: Mellon
According to exit polling, 20% of the people who voted in the Republican primary were not Republicans. Many of them voted for McCain.
36
posted on
01/30/2008 8:09:25 AM PST
by
gruna
To: gruna
“According to exit polling, 20% of the people who voted in the Republican primary were not Republicans. Many of them voted for McCain.”
I have heard that, but also heard that they were only able to vote for the ballot initiatives.
I do not know, but it makes me wonder if the way that they voted yesterday affect how they will be able to vote in November.
37
posted on
01/30/2008 8:16:55 AM PST
by
Preachin'
(I stand with many voters who will never vote for a pro abortion candidate.)
To: gruna
So called independents who are really democrats are picking the Republican nominee. Independents should not be allowed to vote at this stage. Republicans should pick the republican candidate and the democrats should pick the democrat candidate.
I suspect that there were lots of so called independent that voted for McCain, including a bunch of hispanics who love his amnesty plan. That is what pushed him over the top.
38
posted on
01/30/2008 8:17:43 AM PST
by
HwyChile
To: Preachin'
The exit polling results show for which candidate they voted. McCain received well over 40% of their votes.
39
posted on
01/30/2008 8:22:40 AM PST
by
gruna
To: SoFloFreeper
That looks like Coral Ridge Isles and Coral Ridge Heights, that is a pretty affluent neighborhood. Most houses have canal access direct to intercoastal waterway. Looks like snowbirds voted in Florida. We can probably find over 50 cases of two state double voting voter fraud if there was even a perfunctory investigation by a semi-competent government agency.
http://www.zillow.com/real-estate/FL-Fort-Lauderdale/Coral-Ridge-Isles
To: tsmith130
.but it's a difference of 90 votes. Not exactly, it is a difference of 90 votes- IF you would expect 100% voter turnout, but if you look at all other counties, they are ranging around 25% turnout.
41
posted on
01/30/2008 8:56:55 AM PST
by
mnehring
(Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
To: JerseyHighlander
Precincts Registered Voters D001 930
Hillary Clinton Election Day Votes Absentee Votes Early Voting Provisional Total Votes 81 4 424 0 509
This stinks to high heaven. 930 registered voters, and 629 early or absentee votes for Democrat candidates.
Hillary had 424 Early Votes and 4 absentee votes.
Inconceivable to not be residence voting fraud.
To: mnehrling
All of the fraud is openly exposed here. http://enr2.clarityelections.com/Default.aspx?page=R&c=broward&eid=270&lid=1&ref=false
| Excel Spreadsheet |
Precinct level details for election results. Contains votes received by each choice in each contest in each precinct, by vote type. |
detailxls.zip |
153.0 kB |
|
To: HwyChile
44
posted on
01/30/2008 9:18:31 AM PST
by
gruna
To: SoFloFreeper
45
posted on
01/30/2008 9:23:40 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: SoFloFreeper
I just got emailed this. Something smells, and it ain’t the fish.
46
posted on
01/30/2008 9:59:29 AM PST
by
Domandred
(Eagles soar, but unfortunately weasels never get sucked into jet engines)
To: nmh
On the surface it sounds like user error. Hitting the 9 which is right next to the 0, and not proof reading before committing to the website.
Ten again, if it is a heavy Democrat precinct, it could be proof of Dem voter fraud.
47
posted on
01/30/2008 10:17:41 AM PST
by
AFreeBird
(No Romney, No Rudy, No McLame, No Huck, No Paul! Toss the GOP into the ashcan of History.)
To: nmh
It's all good.
109% is better than expected.
Anytime something is better than expected, it's a good thing.
This is a good thing.
48
posted on
01/30/2008 10:21:48 AM PST
by
kinsman redeemer
(The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
To: camle
49
posted on
01/30/2008 10:23:24 AM PST
by
mimaw
To: kinsman redeemer
50
posted on
01/30/2008 10:28:30 AM PST
by
madconservative
(Founding member of the Constantinople Liberation Organization.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson