Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Median Home Prices Would Look Like If the Bubble Never Happened
HomeGuide123 ^ | January 28, 2008

Posted on 01/30/2008 8:15:28 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free

It is obvious to most people that we are in the midst of a national housing bubble. Nevertheless, there are still plenty of naysayers who are telling anyone who will listen that there are local bubbles only.

Using the 2.8 formula, it is clear that local bubbles aren't the problem. Median home prices are inflated in every U.S. region. In the West, where the median household income is $52,249, median home prices are more than double what they should be. The situation is similar in the Northeast, where the median household income is $52,057.

Median home prices are not quite as high in the South and the Midwest, where median household incomes are $43,884 and $47,836 respectively. Even so, prices are still 30 percent higher than what they should be in the South and 16 percent higher than what they should be in the Midwest.

(Excerpt) Read more at homeguide123.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: economy; housing; housingbubble; recession; subprime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble, houses burn, forrclosures double.
1 posted on 01/30/2008 8:15:36 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
If you take "Florida" out of the south, most of it is very affordable. One thing that makes real estate harder to judge based on the last 30 or 40 years is that interest rates are so low. Borrowing 100k at 12-20% is as expensive or more expensive than borrowing 200k at 5%. Real costs of ownership are not up as high as it would appear based on value alone. The problem with the bubble was that loans were given to people with crappy credit with little/no down and just no down payments period. If you plop down $25-100k of your own money up front, you'll think long and hard before signing the dotted line.
2 posted on 01/30/2008 8:20:26 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Interesting article, however I would point out:

a) median home prices over many years do not take into account the larger square footage of newer houses

b) the high costs, and inflationary effects of the municipality piling fee after fee on top of the developer.

3 posted on 01/30/2008 8:21:47 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

I bought my current house new 7 years ago. It trippled here in the boom, but now we’re in a bust and it has dropped in value, but, it is still worth more than double what I paid for it.


4 posted on 01/30/2008 8:29:05 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Another legacy from the Clinton years = making homes "affordable" for the "Minorities" and low income - was the rhetoric = giving banks, lenders another cash cow was the reason.

By qualifying people for mortgages far above what their income could really handle = pay only the interest - etc etc ...then, of course, everyone climbed on the band wagon, driving the price of homes up almost double...realtors benefited, towns saw tax coffers swell - was beyond their real value...

Anyone who couldn't see this disaster coming from the get-go had blinders on.

My modest house in California that I bought in 1972 for $18,500 and sold in 1975 for $30,000 now goes for half a million. Insanity.

Beyond me how it can ever be brought to sanity - too many people in homes priced way beyond worth...

5 posted on 01/30/2008 8:30:43 PM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

We bought our first house in the early 80’s...interest rate 10 percent, and it cost $35,000 (paid it off in 8 years.) Bought our second house in 1989 at a cost of $57,000 and the interest rate was 8%, and we kept refinancing down as the rate dropped until we paid it off.

Now if a young person would come along today and buy our home, the cost (after the bubble has burst) would be around $300,000, and the sad part is they would pay more for taxes and insurance alone, not counting the mortgage cost, than we ever paid for all three combined.

Difference in our income back in ‘89 and the average income now, I don’t think it’s doubled, yet the price of the house has soared. I feel bad for people trying to break into the real estate market, it’s awfully hard...at least in our part of the country. I just read a Forbes report about our area that says we’re probably going to see a V recovery, prices will bottom out and then spike up. IMHO, that’s not good news for our local economy...the average working family can’t and won’t be able to afford housing.


6 posted on 01/30/2008 8:31:22 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
California & Florida prices went out of control. Prices where I live (Greensboro, NC) are up around 15-30% total from 7 years ago. Raleigh/Charlotte had better appreciation but still it's relatively cheap compared to the other hot markets.
7 posted on 01/30/2008 8:31:41 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

The bubble around here is in capacity, not price. Adjusted for inflation, there has been little change in prices in this area over the last 10 years or so, and probably over the last 30. (There was a bubble in the late 80s, but if you start either before or after that bubble, the numbers should work out about the same. The main bubbles were in the northeast, California, and portions of Florida.


8 posted on 01/30/2008 8:33:09 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka
a) median home prices over many years do not take into account the larger square footage of newer houses

That's a complicated one to analyze because in many cases the added size is not adding utility. I know people who routinely keep two rooms or a whole recreation room dark and unheated. These oversize McMansions were purchased for prestige value not use. The situation is somewhat similar to a sports car which goes 180 mph (or 205, I guess, in the case of the new Corvette). In fact, most passenger vehicles including pickup trucks will go over 115. Does this capability add economic value?

9 posted on 01/30/2008 8:37:14 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Just listed in the DC Exurbs:

1901 CAROLINE CT
WOODBRIDGE, VA 22191
List Price: $189,900
Prior Sale: $450,000 2/24/2006
Listing Date: 01/23/08
-57.8%

13912 LYNHURST DR
WOODBRIDGE, VA 22193
List Price: $179,900
Prior Sale: $417,000 8/5/2005
Listing Date: 01/28/08
-56.9%

8842 CHERRY OAK CT
MANASSAS, VA 20109
List Price: $129,900
Prior Sale: $295,000 8/31/2005
Listing Date: 01/25/08
-56.0%

1927 WILLOW LN
WOODBRIDGE, VA 22191
List Price: $159,000
Prior Sale: $350,000 1/24/2006
Listing Date: 01/23/08
-54.6%

7986 DEWARD CT
MANASSAS, VA 20110
List Price: $224,900
Prior Sale: $495,000 5/17/2006
Listing Date: 01/24/08
-54.6%

http://www.novabubblefallout.com


10 posted on 01/30/2008 8:38:45 PM PST by agrarianlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Heh. The “bubble” started in the early 1970s.


11 posted on 01/30/2008 8:43:55 PM PST by familyop (One Baby Boomer from the pile of s__t generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86
Does this capability add economic value?

Yes, I have a work room in my house and an entertainment room that I wouldn't have had 50 years ago. I can entertain more guests, etc.

12 posted on 01/30/2008 8:44:03 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

There is no way you could even build an average size house for $134692 like they’re saying the median should be - even if you used illegal labor.

I know because I just finished building my own home myself (without illegals). I spent approximately $165,000 in construction, 65,000 for the lot and about 10,000 for financing. I did a lot of the labor myself (framing, all cosmetics, etc). Altogether it cost me about $240,000 to build a 2157 sq foot home (not including the basement). There’s no way you would ever find workers or materials to build a home for $134000.


13 posted on 01/30/2008 8:44:55 PM PST by loreldan (Former Fred supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Home prices in Washington state are up 7% for 2007, not as big of an increase as in previous years, but an increase, never the less.


14 posted on 01/30/2008 8:46:00 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

I am not saying that no one uses all their space. I use all my space. But a big chunk of newer homeowners don’t and have no plans to have children who will, etc.


15 posted on 01/30/2008 8:47:16 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steve86

The average family WANTS big houses. When I was a kid we had a very modest 3 bedroom house by todays standards, but a huge yard by the same standards. Today we want gigantic houses with tiny yards. In the 70s people would laugh at the idea of these houses built basically on top of one another, with no front yard and a back yard that you can barbecue in, but not much else.


16 posted on 01/30/2008 8:50:10 PM PST by boop (Democracy is the theory that the people get the government they deserve, good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: steve86

That doesn’t mean though that Sq ft and low interest rates shouldn’t be taken into account. For example, this article talks about average from the 70s to current. It fails to mention that interest rates in the 70s and 80s were 2x-3x for a mortgage that they are now meaning it would be significantly more expensive than than now if the income:Price ratio stayed constant.


17 posted on 01/30/2008 8:50:45 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: boop

You want a tiny yard? You can keep it.


18 posted on 01/30/2008 8:51:58 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

No argument with that.


19 posted on 01/30/2008 8:52:41 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ikka
a) median home prices over many years do not take into account the larger square footage of newer houses

That is really a side splitter. LOL

You cannot appraise a home without consideration of the finished square feet. ROFLOL

20 posted on 01/30/2008 8:54:46 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson