Posted on 02/03/2008 9:46:31 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Robert Novak reports that President Bush won’t support Mitt Romney because he changed his mind about shamnesty (hat tip - reader Rosebud).
While President George W. Bush has maintained neutrality among contenders for the Republican presidential nomination, he privately expresses to friends his exasperation with Mitt Romney’s hard-line stance on immigration.
Bush is upset that Romney changed his position on the issue, compared to what it had been when he was governor of Massachusetts, at the expense of the president’s immigration reform. Bush and Sen. John McCain are not close, but the president is grateful for McCain’s support on Iraq and immigration.
A footnote: The president’s younger brother, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, has not endorsed any presidential candidate. But he and his political allies were behind Romney’s losing effort in last Tuesday’s Florida primary.
Welcome to 2008: The year of the Open Borders Republican Party.
It’s going to be a long year, my friends.
Of course bush supports the pro-amnesty candidate.
It amazes me that this President feels so strongly about open borders and third world immigration he apparently is passively supporting McCain..who did his best to embarrass the President for the past 8 years.
Feds fine few employers of illegal immigrants
By Lisa Friedman, Washington Bureau
Article Created: 05/23/2006 09:32:43 PM PDT
WASHINGTON - Despite the national spotlight on immigration reform, the federal government has virtually abandoned financial sanctions as a way to punish employers for hiring illegal immigrants, choosing instead to pursue criminal penalties, according to officials and documents.
Dean Boyd, spokesman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said fines against employers were ineffective as a deterrent to hiring illegal immigrants, with some companies simply considering the penalties a cost of doing business.
So beginning in 2003, he said, the agency dramatically decreased the number of fines imposed, while increasing its criminal prosecutions.
“We have found that to be a far greater wake-up call” to employers, Boyd said. “We’ve really changed the way we’re going about doing our business. We are taking a completely new strategy,” he said.
But critics blasted the agency for backing down from its efforts to discourage and penalize those who help undocumented workers.
“To say that their efforts are trivial are to grossly overstate their efforts,” said Steven Camarota, research director for the Center for Immigration Studies, a D.C.-based think tank that takes a hard line on illegal immigration.
“Gee, maybe we don’t have a problem anymore,” said Rep.
Elton Gallegly, R-Thousand Oaks, who long has advocated increased enforcement of immigration laws.
With Congress poised this week to approve a massive immigration overhaul, lawmakers and President Bush have touted their dedication to beefing up security at the border and increasing fines for hiring illegal immigrants. But analysts said fresh statistics make them skeptical the proposed tougher punishments against employers will even be enforced.
“Until you get a reformed system, it’s going to be impossible to have the robust enforcement we all agree is appropriate,” said Marshall Fitz, director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
But Boyd noted that criminal prosecutions have risen steadily since the agency changed tactics. Arrests rose 10 percent from 2004 to 2005, resulting in 127 criminal convictions last year.
This year, the agency has made more than 2,000 arrests in connection with the employment of illegal immigrants.
Seizures and forfeitures also have taken the place of fines, Boyd said. Wal-Mart agreed to pay $11 million last year after the government found it hired illegal immigrants for cleaning crews at its stores, and last month the owners of three sushi restaurants in Baltimore agreed to forfeit more than $1.1 million after pleading guilty to hiring illegal immigrants.
He noted that the Wal-Mart settlement alone equaled eight years of civil penalties collected by the old Immigration and Naturalization Services.
But with an estimated 7.2 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. work force, lawmakers and analysts said they think the administration’s enforcement efforts don’t go far enough.
“When we know there’s over 10 million people out there working with invalid Social Security numbers, 511 arrests doesn’t seem like a very good record,” Gallegly said.
Carl W. Hampe, a former U.S. Senate counsel who helped draft the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, said Congress purposely created civil and criminal penalties and that both should be enforced.
“There seems to be no excuse for not enforcing the law civilly,” he said, calling ICE’s new strategy of focusing only on criminal prosecutions “not consistent with the intent of Congress.”
Hampe also criticized the number of arrests.
“For 8 million employers, that’s like, never. It’s such a small drop in the bucket,” he said.
Rep. David Dreier, R-Glendora, who has proposed a national Social Security card system that would enable employers to easily verify a worker’s employment status, said the statistics show the need for a better overall system.
“As enforcement is stepped up, it’s also important that we improve the employment eligibility verification system, so that employers can feel confident they are making legitimate hiring decisions,” he said. “It would be far easier to root out the bad apples if we gave honest and hardworking business owners the tools necessary to follow the law.”
Bush, you make me sick.
National ID card and enforcement of the laws that fine employers are the only solution to the illegal problem.
Important Endorsement for Romney - Michael Cutler
Why I believe Governor Mitt Romney is best on the immigration issue.
By Michael Cutler 2/2/08 MCutler007@aol.com
The presidential campaign is grinding on and this Tuesday is so-called “Super Tuesday.” I have had the opportunity to consider the positions that have ben taken by the candidates for the Presidency especially where the critical issue of immigration is concerned and have come to the conclusion that the only real choice is Mitt Romney.[snip]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1964459/posts?page=27#27
Bush should know that Romney's flip flop isn't meaningful. Assuming that Novak's sourceless claim is more than just noise.
In March 2006, Romney Said He Did Not Believe In “Rounding Up 11 Million People And Forcing Them At Gunpoint From Our Country.” “Romney said illegal immigrants should have a chance to obtain citizenship. ‘I don’t believe in rounding up 11 million people and forcing them at gunpoint from our country,’ Romney said. ‘With these 11 million people, let’s have them registered, know who they are. Those who’ve been arrested or convicted of crimes shouldn’t be here; those that are here paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process towards application for citizenship, as they would from their home country.’” (Evan Lehmann, “Romney Supports Immigration Program, But Not Granting ‘Amnesty,’” Lowell [MA] Sun, 3/30/06)
I am beginning to wonder why I ever supported President Bush.
Well, OK, that does it.. I'll vote for McAmnesty then!
Six of one, half dozen of the other...
Read this: What Americans Want on Immigration http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1964492/posts
Romney has changed his position on a whole lot of issues since deciding to run for president. Why, it seems like just yesterday he was a pro-choice, pro gay, pro gun control, pro amnesty Massachusetts liberal. Thank God he shook all that liberal bilgewater off his back.
Look at it this way this is even better for Romney than if Bush had endosed him.
Yeah, but McCain did end up supporting W in 2000.
Check this out: What American Wants on Immigration http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1964492/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.