Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Romney Failed
National Review ^ | February 8, 2008 | Byron York

Posted on 02/08/2008 4:02:17 AM PST by monkapotamus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: monkapotamus
It was about that ineffable something that voters look for in candidates.

Authenticity?

21 posted on 02/08/2008 4:32:15 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Appleby
Mitt is a CEO. He is an executive. He embodies the attributes, talents and demeanor that every successful CEO must have. They are the same attributes and talents that we need in our Presidents.

It is ironic that those same qualities that make CEOs successful make them appear inapproachable and emotionally detached. Mitt, the prototypical CEO never connected viscerally.

It is, imo, more ironic that the most popular candidate on the national stage, Obama, is the polar opposite of Romney...all personality, no executive talent. America's most important election has more in common with American Idol than Lincoln/Douglas.

22 posted on 02/08/2008 4:32:19 AM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan
but alas, I’m left scratching my head at why Republicans believe what CNN feeds them.

That's because Republicans are more concerned about the survival of their party rather than the assault on conservatism itself.

And so, out of fear, they rush to one whom they think will "win" for them.

I believe it's time for conservatives in the GOP to stop referring to ourselves as "Republicans" but rather conservatives by bailing out as fast as we can.

If not, then the "R" will consume us.

23 posted on 02/08/2008 4:32:43 AM PST by A2J (Love Jesus...hate "church.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
It was about that ineffable something that voters look for in candidates.

Authenticity?

And McCain is just oozing with it right? He is an authentic RINO.

24 posted on 02/08/2008 4:36:34 AM PST by txlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

“Why Romney Failed”

Simple. RINO.


25 posted on 02/08/2008 4:37:49 AM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense? Don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

‘Nough said...


26 posted on 02/08/2008 4:39:12 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Appleby
Mike Huckabee described Romney succinctly: He looks like the guy that just laid you off...

Perhaps you and Mike can send out the memo as to who has the right "look" to be president now?

Obama?

27 posted on 02/08/2008 4:39:36 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A2J

I agree. Conservatives need to stand up and show the GOP that we too are a “force” to be reckoned with. Yesterday I changed my registration from Republican to Independent and will remain as such until either the Republican party stops pandering to moderates who vote for Democrats, or another party comes along that best represents conservatives. I owe no allegiance to any party, only to my ideas.


28 posted on 02/08/2008 4:40:36 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan ("When you can't make them see the light; make them feel the heat." President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom; monkapotamus
Romney placed his faith in his magnificent organization and his PowerPoint analyses.

BINGO!

He came across as a soulless, yet competent, CEO. The kind who focuses on the balance sheet but will throw you to the PC wolves just to get along.

Don't get me wrong, Mitt can be likable and would make a better prez than the rest of the field. However, saying he had to lean left in Mass is not enough.

He was still leaning left 3 months into the end of his term when he knew he was leaving office and headed for the national election. (I guess he figured: gain Mass votes, no one will know outside Mass).

He saddled Mass with a lousy "universal health care" for one reason only: to run on it nationally vs the Dems.

On gay marriage and illegals, he became "tough" his last 3 days in office. Talk about insulting my intelligence.

Sorry Mitt, but as smart as you are are, can't switch to "conservative" overnight.

29 posted on 02/08/2008 4:40:44 AM PST by beckaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus
When Romney tried to present himself as the most conservative of conservative candidates — remember when he said, playing on Paul Wellstone’s old line, that he represented “the Republican wing of the Republican party”? — a lot of conservatives in Iowa and South Carolina and beyond didn’t quite know what to think. When they saw video of him in the fall of 2002 — not that long ago, during a debate in his run for Massachusetts governor — vowing to “preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose” five times in a relatively brief period of time, they didn’t quite know what to think. When they saw video of him almost indignantly saying that “I wasn’t a Ronald Reagan conservative” and “Look, I was an independent during the time of Reagan/Bush; I am not trying to return to Reagan/Bush” — they didn’t quite know what to think. And when they read the letter he wrote saying he would “seek to establish full equality for America’s gay and lesbian citizens” even more than Ted Kennedy, they didn’t quite know what to think.

and at what point will Freepers realize this is why those of us from New England knew the emperor had no clothes?

30 posted on 02/08/2008 4:42:49 AM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35
IMO, Mitt lost because Conservatives did not realize just how this cycle was going to turn out,

True... he was Satan Incarnate and then he "magically" morphed into a "better of the evils" Jesus by the same people who swear they will never vote that way.

31 posted on 02/08/2008 4:43:22 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Appleby
That is why I believe Romney lost: because his response in an emergency would be to force someone else to do research until the threat goes away.

That's an interesting bit of analysis. /s

32 posted on 02/08/2008 4:43:36 AM PST by TankerKC (I tried to find more Nixon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: padre35

A Massachusetts liberal should never have been in the race. Same for a New York liberal. And there’s no way in hell either of them should ever had obtained front runner status. Same goes for the turncoat insane shamnesty dude from Arizona. The Republican poll responders and supporters that elevated these guys are nuts! They should have been disqualified and rejected immediately per their public records. Nothing but an expensive exercise in futility. Unfortunately, no lessons will have been learned.


33 posted on 02/08/2008 4:43:45 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Appleby
The MRDS, has been going around in the media and spread by Huckabee for few months now. Too bad many of us were not immune to it. May be next time around we will not be so easily struck down by it?
34 posted on 02/08/2008 4:45:00 AM PST by Chgogal (When you vote Democrat, you vote Al Qaeda! Ari Emanuel, Rahm's brother was agent to Moore's F9/11.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Appleby
McCain Derangement Syndrome. Save us.

Call it what you like, noob, but to dismiss the disgust for John McCain felt by many here is real-- as real as the growing realization that George Bush is not the man many of us voted for.

As for "saving" you, this morning it appears that you McCain apologists have done amazingly well in flooding FR, so I don't think you need saving. Or was that just a cute little dismissive? Sort of like, "whatever."

I'm actually amazed at the number of people who are willing to swallow a whole lot of fluids and vote for your man "for the good of the country." I'll give your crazy old Machievellian bastard credit: he correctly underestimated "conservatives" that I had incorrectly overestimated. I won't make the same mistake. For example: I always figured that a fair chunk of the "pry my gun from my cold, dead hands" crowd would be meekly turning in their shootin' irons when the day came, but this morning, I will revise my projection; most of them will walk their pieces to the smelter personally if the Gutless Old Party says it is good for the War on Terror.

I do expect a lower percentage of Paulians would just "lie back and think of America" when it happens. I may be stingy with the compliments today, but I'll give 'em their due.

Mr. niteowl77

35 posted on 02/08/2008 4:45:34 AM PST by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

Romney failed b/c he came across as a newly minted conservative. His public persona also is one of a cross between Max Headroom and Joe Isuzu.

No thanks.


36 posted on 02/08/2008 4:45:51 AM PST by sauropod (I'd rather be waterboarded than vote for John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Agreed, see my post 29.

Also, he often seemed robotic (though articulate).

Button # 1: Immigration line

Button # 2: Ronald Reagan line

Button # 3: Iraq and terror

etc.

Finally, saw emotion from the guy the day he bowed out.

the last two days


37 posted on 02/08/2008 4:47:03 AM PST by beckaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Appleby

Welcome to FR.


38 posted on 02/08/2008 4:47:22 AM PST by sauropod (I'd rather be waterboarded than vote for John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trenton1776
Too bad you might be speaking the truth.

Wouldn't it be ironic if the MSM created McCain (they did) and now they've done such a good job that he takes out their real darling--Hitlery?

39 posted on 02/08/2008 4:48:23 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Appleby
“Mike Huckabee described Romney succinctly: He looks like the guy that just laid you off”

So what. Huckabee looks like a hillbilly. He has no gravitas whatsoever. I wasn't a Mitt supporter, but he looked and acted a whole lot more presidential that Huckabee.

40 posted on 02/08/2008 4:50:07 AM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense? Don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson