1 posted on
02/08/2008 10:14:28 AM PST by
tang0r
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: tang0r
This article is an attempt to reach out to my free-market friends with five reasons why the carbon tax still is the best option for American policy - even if they're right about global warming. Admittedly I didn't follow the link, but I do know that your everyday totalitarian moonbat liberal believes that a good stiff tax fixes everything and they are all too anxious to tax us into prosperity.
31 posted on
02/08/2008 11:23:36 AM PST by
RJL
To: tang0r
I think the libertarians are moving farther and farther to the left everyday... A “libertarian” proposing a tax such as this? Unbelieveable!
33 posted on
02/08/2008 11:26:11 AM PST by
LibertyRocks
("Islam - The Religion of Pieces" -- quote from LR's "Infidel & Proud" Daughter)
To: tang0r
To: tang0r
Three Hundred Billion Plus reasons not to approve any tax at all.
That’s the approximate number of people money is stolen from in the form of taxes in this country.
At least 90% of taxes collected are misused.
37 posted on
02/08/2008 11:38:09 AM PST by
Syncro
To: tang0r
41 posted on
02/08/2008 11:50:19 AM PST by
CMAC51
To: tang0r; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...
Go MythBusters!
43 posted on
02/08/2008 11:58:01 AM PST by
xcamel
(Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
To: tang0r
44 posted on
02/08/2008 12:04:29 PM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: tang0r
New doofus theory:
Even if the danger is totally imaginary, additional taxes are good for everybody.
Ummmmmm.
Ok.
45 posted on
02/08/2008 12:05:51 PM PST by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: tang0r
The Price of Oil increased by 250% in the last 3 years.
It never made a dent in the consumption of Oil.
So the premise that a Carbon tax will reduce consumption or carbon emmissions is falsified.
To: tang0r
The way to answer whether there is a scientific consensus about the effects of man on the climate is to seek the expert opinions of as many climatologists and economists as possible. (Think the AP and Coaches' polls in college football.) Strikingly horrible analogy.
I don't know what the guy knows about climate science, (he admits nothing special) but he obviously knows even less about college football.
And he somehow thinks that 'consensus has something to do with the scientific process. That consensus thing went out with Galileo and didn't return to the Western world until a D+ college science student named Al Gore decided it did.
50 posted on
02/08/2008 10:43:33 PM PST by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
To: tang0r
56 posted on
02/09/2008 5:23:34 AM PST by
Navy Patriot
(John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson