Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Should Be Feared, Writer Says
Newsmax Insider Report (email) | February 10, 2008 | Newsmax

Posted on 02/10/2008 2:09:16 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

1. McCain Should Be Feared, Writer Says

Presidential hopeful John McCain is being billed as the Republican that liberals can live with, but his credentials as a “bipartisan progressive” are in fact a “lazy, hazy myth,” according to liberal pundit Johann Hari.

“The truth is that McCain is the candidate we should most fear,” writes Hari, a columnist for The Independent in Britain, in an article that appeared in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. “Not only is he to the right of Bush on a whole range of subjects, he is also the Republican candidate most likely to dispense with Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.”

Hari writes of McCain: “Rage seems to be at the core of his personality. Describing his own childhood, McCain has written: ‘At the smallest provocation I would go off into a mad frenzy, and then suddenly crash to the floor unconscious. When I got angry I held my breath until I blacked out.’”

McCain has distinguished himself as an uber-hawk on foreign policy, according to Hari, who is on the editorial board of The Liberal magazine.

“To give a brief smorgasbord of his views: At a recent rally, he sang 'bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb-bomb Iran,' to the tune of the Beach Boys' ‘Barbara Ann.’ He says North Korea should be threatened with ‘extinction.’

“McCain has mostly opposed using U.S. power for humanitarian goals, jeering at proposals to intervene in Rwanda or Bosnia . . .

“So why do so many nice liberals have a weak spot for McCain? Well, to his credit, he doesn't hate immigrants: He proposed a program to legalize the 12 million undocumented workers in the U.S. He sincerely opposes torture, as a survivor of it himself. He has apologized for denying global warming and now advocates a cap on greenhouse gas emissions but only if China and India can also be locked into the system.”

Hari concludes: “These sprinklings of sanity — onto a very extreme program — are enough for a superficial, glib press to present McCain as ‘bipartisan’ and ‘centrist.’”

2. McCain-Romney Rancor Dates Back to Olympics

The acrimony that developed between John McCain and Mitt Romney cannot be blamed simply on the heated primary campaign for the GOP presidential nomination — the two Republicans were at odds years ago over the 2002 Winter Olympics.

Romney took over operation of the then financially strapped Olympics in Salt Lake City in February 1999, and set out to enlist new corporate sponsors and fix a large budget shortfall.

Then in September 2000, McCain spoke on the Senate floor against what he called the “staggering” cost the federal government faced in helping stage the Games.

“The American taxpayer is being shaken down to the tune of nearly a billion and a half dollars,” McCain declared.

He vowed to “do everything in my power” to delay or kill “this pork-barrel spending,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

Romney responded by arguing that taxpayers would need to provide only $250 million, and said he was “quite confident” the Games would receive the funding they needed.

In early 2001, McCain sought to shift $30 million from the Treasury Department, earmarked for law enforcement personnel at the Olympics, to the Pentagon, but the measure was defeated.

Romney, in his 2004 book “Turnaround,” wrote that McCain and others in the Senate were threatening to revoke the tax deductibility of corporate sponsorship, which would “nail the coffin of the Salt Lake Olympics and future Games.”

The clash over Olympics spending, “which dragged on for two years, helps explain some of the acrimony that now characterizes the race between the two front-runners for the Republican presidential nomination,” the Times observed.

In the end, the federal tab — not including construction or improvement of highways, transit systems, and other infrastructure — totaled about $400 million, and the Games were a financial success.

3. Obama Wants Plane Conversations Off the Record

Presidential hopeful Barack Obama has touched off a dispute with the press by insisting that conversations he has with reporters on his campaign plane are off the record.

The issue arose during a Feb. 2 flight when Obama entered the press section of his plane and began speaking with several reporters, including Jeff Zeleny of The New York Times.

“When Obama noticed that the red lights of the journalists’ recorders were on, including Zeleny’s, he said that the conversation was off the record,” politico.com reported.

Zeleny protested that he couldn’t take the conversation off the record. Obama answered a few more questions and returned to the front of the plane.

“In my view, whenever he comes back on the plane to talk to reporters, he is on the record,” Zeleny told politico.com.

“We’re not on the plane, in my view, to have private talks with presidential candidates. We’re here to report what they are saying and give our readers a better idea of their campaigns and their candidacies.”

But Jen Psaki, the Obama campaign’s traveling press secretary, responded: “There has never been a press corps in the history of our nation that got as many interviews as they wanted.”

Obama’s Democratic rival Hillary Clinton has also said at times that a conversation at the back of her plane is off the record, although more recently her campaign said those talks would now be on the record.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; 2008; 2008elections; barackobama; bosnia; climatechange; conservatism; democrats; election2008; freedomofthepress; globalwarming; gop; hillaryclinton; immigration; iran; johannhari; johnmccain; mccain; mittromney; northkorea; olympics; politics; pork; press; primaries; progressivemyth; rage; reporters; republicans; romney; rwanda; saltlakecity; temper; theindependent; torture; uberhawk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: ari-freedom
we have to figure out a non-coercive solution for the millions that have already managed to enter.

Making them unable to earn money to buy food might work and then we could leave a trail of chorizo to the border.

21 posted on 02/10/2008 2:42:43 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing.-
Theodore Roosevelt


22 posted on 02/10/2008 2:47:28 PM PST by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Good Post


23 posted on 02/10/2008 2:49:57 PM PST by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

John McCain is a formidable candidate and I will support him in November. He just needs to choose a really good conservative running mate.


24 posted on 02/10/2008 2:51:05 PM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Soon all the world will know McCain isn’t the sort we want in charge. Watch and soon even his most ardent followers will urge him to step down.


25 posted on 02/10/2008 2:56:49 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
It also means that Hillary will lose the nomination.

That may be happening
Maine Caucus 59% in
Obama 1,305 57%
Clinton 956 42%
uncommitted 16 1%
per CNN

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#ME

Coupled with what happened yesterday
26 posted on 02/10/2008 3:04:59 PM PST by BigEdLB (BigEd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

Don’t give them welfare but they probably won’t leave because the economic opportunity over here even without welfare is much much better than what they can get in mexico. This will be a matter of time and attrition but first you have to build the border.


27 posted on 02/10/2008 3:05:23 PM PST by ari-freedom (Pragmatism: the 4th leg of conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Read the article more carefully. The thesis of the article is anti-McCain or that he’s “crazy” wholly in terms of those aspects of his views that are actually conservative.


28 posted on 02/10/2008 3:09:20 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

and he will get virginia and maryland


29 posted on 02/10/2008 3:09:40 PM PST by ari-freedom (Pragmatism: the 4th leg of conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
“The truth is that McCain is the candidate we should most fear,” writes Hari, a columnist for The Independent in Britain, in an article that appeared in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. “Not only is he to the right of Bush on a whole range of subjects, he is also the Republican candidate most likely to dispense with Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.”

If I actually thought this was true, I might like McCain better.

30 posted on 02/10/2008 3:11:27 PM PST by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
John McCain will provide us with ample opportunity to make fun of politicians. That's about all I'm able to look forward too.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

31 posted on 02/10/2008 3:12:37 PM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

the real liberals...they know that mccain is very conservative. It really bothers them because people like Rush and Ann Coulter positioned him so that he looks like a moderate or almost a democrat


32 posted on 02/10/2008 3:13:17 PM PST by ari-freedom (Pragmatism: the 4th leg of conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

LOL McCain hates “torture” once we capture someone. But, if there is a “take no prisoners” policy.... They make it sound like the “authoroties” better have plenty of virgins ready to go in the Islamofascist afterworld....


33 posted on 02/10/2008 3:17:52 PM PST by BigEdLB (BigEd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

his credentials as a “bipartisan progressive”

The liberals call themselves “progressives”

Is McCain reaching across the aisle from our side...

Or reaching across the aisle to us from their side...?????


34 posted on 02/10/2008 3:20:17 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

McCain scares me.

Obama and Hillary scare me more.


35 posted on 02/10/2008 3:25:36 PM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Once more anyone who wants to secure the border is characterized as "hating immigrants." I want the border secured to keep out illegal immigrants, but I have nothing against legal immigrants.

After church this morning I was talking to a conservative Republican woman. She asked another woman, a Democrat, what she thought of McCain and the other woman said "he'd just be another four years of Bush." Turns out her candidate had been Edwards.

36 posted on 02/10/2008 3:26:25 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

he doesn’t hate immigrants”

Yes, he does...

McCain is anti-immigration and pro-illegal aliens


37 posted on 02/10/2008 3:31:01 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
Correction. He is wrong on a few things, right on most. He is right on: 1) Right to Life

He was correct to silence Wisconsin Right to Life?

3) National Defense

Throwing open our borders will sure make this country safer, won't it?

4) Judicial Nominations

He was correct to prevent a rule change that would have required the Senate to actually carry out its duty?

38 posted on 02/10/2008 3:34:31 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze
Using a newslibrary.com I found this was printed in USA Today on November 2, 1999:
Before he was 2 years old, Arizona Sen. John McCain writes in his new family memoir, he developed "an outsized temper" that caused him to "go off in a mad frenzy and then, suddenly, crash to the floor unconscious." The doctor told his parents the problem was self-induced: "When I got angry I held my breath until I blacked out."

39 posted on 02/10/2008 3:35:01 PM PST by faq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: faq

WoW...Thank you.


40 posted on 02/10/2008 3:47:29 PM PST by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson