Global Warming is History.

based on data from the National Climatic Data Center ^ | 2-13-08 | dangus

[Vaquero]

[dangus]

Is that Al Gore you’ve added to the OMGs and ONOZs

[cogitator]

Did you check to see how GISS, NOAA, and the Hadley Centre UK rated 2007?

[SlowBoat407]

It’s man-made global cooling! Women and poor peepulz hardest hit! The U.S. needs to send even MORE money to the Thurd Wurld!

/illiterate moonbat gullibility mode

[DManA]

I go to the linked site and I see a graph showing global temperatures up .58 degrees over mean.

[IrishMike]

Excerpt from another very good article

.....Everyone is entitled to their opinions and everyone is entitled to be wrong. However, advocates should be held to a far higher standard when they have access to a powerful public platform, as do Suzuki and rock stars like Bono and Geldof, who also use their fame to push personal, usually uninformed, views. Sadly, these are the people who are granted direct access to politicians while credible scientists and experts are ignored. Of course, the hypocrisy of their lifestyles seriously undermines their credibility. John Travolta telling me to save energy from the cockpit of one of five personal jets needs no comment.

Similarly, Al Gore’s giant carbon footprint stomps on his credibility.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/1824

[hometoroost]

Al has a house here in Nashville. If he’s there do you think he’d come over and help me scrape the global warming off my windshield?

[steelyourfaith]

Beam me to Planet Gore !

The Best Global Warming Videos on the Internet

• Part I ...,. Documentaries
• Part II .............. Lectures
• Part III .............. Debates
• Part IV ..... Short Videos
• Part V ................ Humor

WeatherQuestions
Roy Spencer, the Official Climatologist of the EIB Network

[Vaquero]

MANBEARPIG......the enemy of the Religion of Gore.

google South Park and Manbearpig.

[AndyTheBear]

We will likely hear more about catastrophic “global climate change” and less about catastrophic “global warming” in the coming months.

[elfman2]

"I will publish another report when the February data is complete. So far, it appears that most of the Indian ocean, the second largest ocean in the world, has suddenly cooled. "

It was my understanding that these large bodies of water were largely unresponsive to brief shifts in atmospheric temperature because of their great depth and density, lagging by hundreds of years (and taking an average of that). So I don't understand a "sudden" change.

[elfman2]

"We will likely hear more about catastrophic “global climate change” and less about catastrophic “global warming” in the coming months."

That began a couple of years ago. Being that GW is largely an unmanaged hoax to get liberals elected, we won't hear much at all about it if there's a Democrat sweep.

[dangus]

>> Did you check to see how GISS, NOAA, and the Hadley Centre UK rated 2007? <<

The NOAA called 2007 the fifth warmest year on record. That means that despite the El Nino, it was still cooler than 1998, and the last three years. Since I’m reporting a temperature plunge that happened in 2008, the rating of 2007 doesn’t include what I’m reporting on.

I’m not terribly interested in the spin they put in it, however. I’m using their data (GISS and NOAA), in spite of the tremendous amount of fraud which has been demonstrated. For instance, NOAA still hasn’t adjusted their US temperatures downward, even after admitting that they had been inflated by bad practices.

Incidentally, check out the temperature stations in continuous use for the last 70 years which are rural. Most show no increase in temperatures at all from 1940 to 2007. unfortunately, these are a tiny subset of the temperature stations used. But I’m using the entire data sets of the most hysterical global warming alarmists, anyway.

[dangus]

Go to the links I posted at the end of the article. The main site I linked to is using stale data.

[NorCoGOP]

This is based on the same data sets used by Al Gore, Dr. Hansen, and the IPCC: Global Warming is, for now, history.

But...but...the Goracle claimed it to be so true that "the debate is over."

It couldn't be...that...

...he LOST the debate?

or...shudder...

he was wrong?

Could it?

[kromike]

Dammit, the Reverend already declared that the debate is over and the truly-enlightened-and-important people have reached The Consensus.

Now, you unwashed masses go live in mud huts and wear grass skirts and shut up already.

[dangus]

>> It was my understanding that these large bodies of water were largely unresponsive to brief shifts in atmospheric temperature because of their great depth and density, lagging by hundreds of years (and taking an average of that). <<

That’s correct, which is why I explained in the article that by “ocean temperatures” what global warming alarmists and I mean are average temperatures of the surface of the ocean.

[dangus]

Actually, I’ll re-emphasize this: I’m not debating whether global warming has taken place. I’ll concede, for the sake pf argument, that it has. What I’m showing is that it has been significantly reversed!

[Savage Beast]

What about Y2K? Can we stop worrying about that?