Let's consider this. Folks don't want homosexuals to have children or families of their own so that would mean many homosexuals have extra disposable income. Other folks complain they have money to do with as they please including as an expression of their free political speech. Oh no! We need a McCain-Feingold against the gays.
All that bitterness about folks with money smells like liberal "afluenza" to me.
I suppose the gays could be confined to a work or reeducation camp somewhere instead. (/sarcasm)
I'd like to note, some do "spend their dough raising families" because they've entered into heterosexual marriages or, in particular lesbians, have used science to conceive and bare their child. Some homosexuals have adopted, where that's legal.
You draw completely unwarranted conclusions from my post, and your sarcasm is wasted.
There’s not bitterness, just fact. In no way do I regret the income well-spent on my wonderful family. I’m doing just fine, thank you.
Neither did anyone suggest governmental intervention. Don’t be paranoid.
I just pointed out one reason for the growing influence of homosexual activists: they spend their spare money and time on advocacy while we spend ours rearing families.
When lesbians have children through sperm donation, they are deliberately depriving their child of a father plus all of his relatives. Heterosexuals have done that as well. Neither is right. It’s very focused on what the adult wants for “self fulfillment,” not on anything a child might want or need.