Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon to shoot down broken spy satellite
AP ^ | 02-14-2008 | AP

Posted on 02/14/2008 9:07:45 AM PST by montag813

WASHINGTON - U.S. officials say the Pentagon is planning to shoot down a broken spy satellite expected to hit the Earth in early March.

This is the U.S. military will use a missile to destroy a satellite in space, NBC News reports.

The spy satellite has lost all power and is expected to crash back on earth in early March, spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aegis; bmd; dod; interceptor; lockheed; missile; missiledefense; nasa; pentagon; raytheon; satellite; sm3; usn; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-142 next last
Modified SM-3 missiles will be used from a destroyer and cruiser in the Pacific.
1 posted on 02/14/2008 9:07:46 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: montag813

Should be a good test.


2 posted on 02/14/2008 9:09:18 AM PST by PlanoMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Didn’t we get all perturbed because the Chinese shot a sattelite in orbit and created a lot of space junk?


3 posted on 02/14/2008 9:09:47 AM PST by saganite (Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Won’t this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.?


4 posted on 02/14/2008 9:10:03 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Right out of a Tom Clancy novel.


5 posted on 02/14/2008 9:10:22 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
I guess the Chinese can say now their reasons for doing the same thing were just as valid.
6 posted on 02/14/2008 9:11:30 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: montag813
If the intercept is successful and the satellite blown to bits, it appears most of the debris will become orbitting "space junk" and not re-enter the earth's atmopshere.

Just more junk to keep track of now... it's getting pretty messy up there.

7 posted on 02/14/2008 9:12:24 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Cool. When?


8 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:22 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

They might chunk it, but a call to Beijing would result in the advise that blowing up a satellite doesn’t bring it down but results in thousands of smaller satellites.


9 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:33 AM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Earlier article:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22857051/

"...The U.S. military has no weapon designed to shoot down a satellite, but it demonstrated the ability to do that in the mid-1980s, and could cobble together a plan to do so again fairly quickly, said the senior defense official.

Such a move appears unlikely, given global dismay about China’s use of a missile to destroy a much bigger satellite at a higher orbit, which scattered nearly 1,000 pieces of debris throughout space, the official said..."

10 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:55 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

Near-Earth orbit spy satellite. Debris should enter atmosphere and burn up shortly after destruction. Space Center is further out in space.

OTOH, I’d scream with laughter if they “accidently” took out an communist spy-sat.

Memo to Putin: Ooops, my bad
Signed: Dubya


11 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:55 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Didn’t we get all perturbed because the Chinese shot a sattelite in orbit and created a lot of space junk?

Yeah, but come on, they're Chinese...

12 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:58 AM PST by Living Free in NH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

But the space shuttle still has to fly through that altitude range.


13 posted on 02/14/2008 9:15:05 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

“I guess the Chinese can say now their reasons for doing the same thing were just as valid.”

As if they care about “valid” reasons for anything they do....


14 posted on 02/14/2008 9:15:37 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813
---spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.--

--I can't believe the fuel was going to survive re-entry or that it was going to be that hazardous--so now we are going to spread junk over multiples of millions of cubic miles of space just as the Chinese did??

15 posted on 02/14/2008 9:16:12 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Modified SM-3 missiles will be used from a destroyer and cruiser in the Pacific.

Wow, looks like I actually guessed correctly at the likely weapons system.

16 posted on 02/14/2008 9:17:21 AM PST by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

there must be some other reason for doing this - maybe the Russians have the capability to grab it.


17 posted on 02/14/2008 9:17:56 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: saganite

different orbit, no?

And that said, who cares?


18 posted on 02/14/2008 9:18:48 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I think this is also a “heads up” to China, Russia, NK and Iran as well.


19 posted on 02/14/2008 9:20:48 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

“there must be some other reason for doing this - maybe the Russians have the capability to grab it.”

Or the debri field will cross paths with a few chinese or ruski satellites on the way down.


20 posted on 02/14/2008 9:22:12 AM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: montag813
This is not exactly news. I believe the Russians in the past tested this using their Almaz manned military space station.
21 posted on 02/14/2008 9:22:19 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Won’t this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.?

Depends on when and where they hit it. If they wait until the satellite is low enough that it's beginning to contact the atmosphere, then most of the little pieces resulting from a missile strike will burn up pretty quickly.

22 posted on 02/14/2008 9:22:42 AM PST by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!
23 posted on 02/14/2008 9:22:46 AM PST by YouGoTexasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: saganite

We were just PO’d because it was China.


24 posted on 02/14/2008 9:23:07 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Is this satellite in a polar orbit - launched from Vandenberg?


25 posted on 02/14/2008 9:23:17 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Won’t this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.?

Note that they are waiting for USA-193 to come down very low, below the operational height of most if not all low earth orbit satellites. When they try to destroy it then, presumably the debris cloud will remain low and decay relatively quickly... not to say some debris might be ejected into a higher orbit for a while, but hopefully they'll control the collision/destruction in such a way to minimize this.
26 posted on 02/14/2008 9:23:33 AM PST by plsvn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

I’m surprised we haven’t sub-contracted this work out TO the Chinese.........


27 posted on 02/14/2008 9:23:45 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

Did you see the Nova show on that recently? Wild stuff.


28 posted on 02/14/2008 9:24:27 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

-—I can’t help but have the horrible feeling it may be for “environmental” reasons—like “green” bullets-—


29 posted on 02/14/2008 9:24:50 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl

30 posted on 02/14/2008 9:25:20 AM PST by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Coverup.

Alien’s have taken over the device and were planning a covert insertion. good thing it was discovered.

That’s why the government secretly funds concept SCI-FI movies from obscure screewriters. We have stories that lay-out a scenario, it is made into a move (AVP) and then if it really happens, nobody believes it. ingenious.


31 posted on 02/14/2008 9:26:20 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

And that said, who cares?

Anybody who puts a functioning satellite in orbit would be my first guess but I could be wrong. /s/


32 posted on 02/14/2008 9:27:21 AM PST by saganite (Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
>Cool

When normal people
shoot up an old TV set,
you have a few beers

and make it game.
The Feds should let the Navy
make it a contest,

let two task forces
try to shoot down the space junk,
winner gets shore leave . . .
33 posted on 02/14/2008 9:28:47 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!

There are going to be more and more business opportunities for getting rid of space junk. The most interesting sounding idea I've heard (not really a new one) is to electromagnetically push it away from one's vehicle/satellite. Sort of like an electromagnetic bumper. Although I'm not an expert, or well versed in the feasibility of this.

34 posted on 02/14/2008 9:29:24 AM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

The resulting cloud of debris will be in the same decaying orbit as the original satellite. (Less a few bits and pieces that might get enough kinetic energy to move into a higher orbit.) The mess will burn up in the atmosphere. The Chinese blew up a satellite that was in a higher, more stable orbit. Their debris is also in that higher, more stable orbit.


35 posted on 02/14/2008 9:29:41 AM PST by Redcloak ("A plague o' both your houses!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Is this satellite in a polar orbit - launched from Vandenberg?

USA-193's inclination is 58.5 degrees so isn't "that" polar. The most northerly it gets is Hudson Bay, central Siberia. South end of the orbit gets a far south as the southern tip of South America.
36 posted on 02/14/2008 9:30:07 AM PST by plsvn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Functioning satellites in that orbit has one particular purpose.


37 posted on 02/14/2008 9:31:13 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: montag813
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the options will not be publicly discussed until a later Pentagon briefing.

can't anybody keep their mouths shut ?
38 posted on 02/14/2008 9:31:21 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Or - the Russians or Chinese have been able to hack into the software. I’m surprised these satellites don’t have a self-destruct device.


39 posted on 02/14/2008 9:31:23 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Check.

This is the Standard Missile variant developed by the Navy to create a sea-based theater anti-ballistic capability for the Missile Defense Agency. It has been successfully tested a number of times.

Shooting down the satellite should be a piece of cake given its size.


40 posted on 02/14/2008 9:31:32 AM PST by Captain Rhino ( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

IM transcript:

PutinKremlin3: d00d! u shot my sat!

WThePrez: p0wn3d! LOL

PutinKremlin3:u r teh suq

WThePrez: all ur sats are belong to us


41 posted on 02/14/2008 9:32:03 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: saganite
>Anybody who puts a functioning satellite in orbit would be my first guess but I could be wrong

Don't worry -- Freepers
always put their satellites
in high orbit and

design their birds with
active defense protocols . . .
The forum is safe.
42 posted on 02/14/2008 9:32:26 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Everything on Earth orbit will come down sooner or later.


43 posted on 02/14/2008 9:33:18 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!

I don't know how to tell you this, but vacuum cleaners don't work in a vacuum.

44 posted on 02/14/2008 9:33:22 AM PST by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Nope. Venezuelans perhaps.


45 posted on 02/14/2008 9:35:21 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, because the information released was Sensitive Compartmented Information.


46 posted on 02/14/2008 9:35:37 AM PST by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Maybe we should just hire the Chinese to shoot down the broken satilite...you know jobs Americans wont do.
47 posted on 02/14/2008 9:38:41 AM PST by svcw (The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Since it’s our money paying for this, we need good, cool video.


48 posted on 02/14/2008 9:38:43 AM PST by JennysCool (They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!

I don't think a vacuum cleaner would work in a vacuum. But I was just thinking about that very thing -- how about several satellites sweeping around the earth with big aerogel panels on the front? That should capture the smaller particles.

49 posted on 02/14/2008 9:39:26 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

xlnt


50 posted on 02/14/2008 9:40:50 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson