Skip to comments.
Pentagon to shoot down broken spy satellite
AP ^
| 02-14-2008
| AP
Posted on 02/14/2008 9:07:45 AM PST by montag813
WASHINGTON - U.S. officials say the Pentagon is planning to shoot down a broken spy satellite expected to hit the Earth in early March.
This is the U.S. military will use a missile to destroy a satellite in space, NBC News reports.
The spy satellite has lost all power and is expected to crash back on earth in early March, spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aegis; bmd; dod; interceptor; lockheed; missile; missiledefense; nasa; pentagon; raytheon; satellite; sm3; usn; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-142 next last
Modified SM-3 missiles will be used from a destroyer and cruiser in the Pacific.
1
posted on
02/14/2008 9:07:46 AM PST
by
montag813
To: montag813
2
posted on
02/14/2008 9:09:18 AM PST
by
PlanoMike
To: montag813
Didn’t we get all perturbed because the Chinese shot a sattelite in orbit and created a lot of space junk?
3
posted on
02/14/2008 9:09:47 AM PST
by
saganite
(Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
To: montag813
Won’t this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.?
4
posted on
02/14/2008 9:10:03 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: montag813
Right out of a Tom Clancy novel.
5
posted on
02/14/2008 9:10:22 AM PST
by
L,TOWM
(Liberals, The Other White Meat)
To: L,TOWM
I guess the Chinese can say now their reasons for doing the same thing were just as valid.
6
posted on
02/14/2008 9:11:30 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: montag813
If the intercept is successful and the satellite blown to bits, it appears most of the debris will become orbitting "space junk" and not re-enter the earth's atmopshere.Just more junk to keep track of now... it's getting pretty messy up there.
7
posted on
02/14/2008 9:12:24 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: montag813
To: montag813
They might chunk it, but a call to Beijing would result in the advise that blowing up a satellite doesn’t bring it down but results in thousands of smaller satellites.
9
posted on
02/14/2008 9:13:33 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
To: montag813
Earlier article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22857051/
"...The U.S. military has no weapon designed to shoot down a satellite, but it demonstrated the ability to do that in the mid-1980s, and could cobble together a plan to do so again fairly quickly, said the senior defense official.
Such a move appears unlikely, given global dismay about Chinas use of a missile to destroy a much bigger satellite at a higher orbit, which scattered nearly 1,000 pieces of debris throughout space, the official said..."
10
posted on
02/14/2008 9:13:55 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Near-Earth orbit spy satellite. Debris should enter atmosphere and burn up shortly after destruction. Space Center is further out in space.
OTOH, I’d scream with laughter if they “accidently” took out an communist spy-sat.
Memo to Putin: Ooops, my bad
Signed: Dubya
To: saganite
Didnt we get all perturbed because the Chinese shot a sattelite in orbit and created a lot of space junk?Yeah, but come on, they're Chinese...
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
But the space shuttle still has to fly through that altitude range.
13
posted on
02/14/2008 9:15:05 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
“I guess the Chinese can say now their reasons for doing the same thing were just as valid.”
As if they care about “valid” reasons for anything they do....
14
posted on
02/14/2008 9:15:37 AM PST
by
Rb ver. 2.0
(Global warming is the new Marxism.)
To: montag813
---
spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.--
--I can't believe the fuel was going to survive re-entry or that it was going to be that hazardous--so now we are going to spread junk over multiples of millions of cubic miles of space just as the Chinese did??
15
posted on
02/14/2008 9:16:12 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: montag813
Modified SM-3 missiles will be used from a destroyer and cruiser in the Pacific. Wow, looks like I actually guessed correctly at the likely weapons system.
16
posted on
02/14/2008 9:17:21 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
To: rellimpank
there must be some other reason for doing this - maybe the Russians have the capability to grab it.
17
posted on
02/14/2008 9:17:56 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: saganite
different orbit, no?
And that said, who cares?
18
posted on
02/14/2008 9:18:48 AM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
To: montag813
I think this is also a “heads up” to China, Russia, NK and Iran as well.
19
posted on
02/14/2008 9:20:48 AM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
“there must be some other reason for doing this - maybe the Russians have the capability to grab it.”
Or the debri field will cross paths with a few chinese or ruski satellites on the way down.
20
posted on
02/14/2008 9:22:12 AM PST
by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: montag813
This is not exactly news. I believe the Russians in the past tested this using their Almaz manned military space station.
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Wont this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.? Depends on when and where they hit it. If they wait until the satellite is low enough that it's beginning to contact the atmosphere, then most of the little pieces resulting from a missile strike will burn up pretty quickly.
22
posted on
02/14/2008 9:22:42 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
To: rhombus
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!
To: saganite
We were just PO’d because it was China.
To: dangerdoc
Is this satellite in a polar orbit - launched from Vandenberg?
25
posted on
02/14/2008 9:23:17 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Wont this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.?
Note that they are waiting for USA-193 to come down very low, below the operational height of most if not all low earth orbit satellites. When they try to destroy it then, presumably the debris cloud will remain low and decay relatively quickly... not to say some debris might be ejected into a higher orbit for a while, but hopefully they'll control the collision/destruction in such a way to minimize this.
26
posted on
02/14/2008 9:23:33 AM PST
by
plsvn
To: theDentist
I’m surprised we haven’t sub-contracted this work out TO the Chinese.........
To: RayChuang88
Did you see the Nova show on that recently? Wild stuff.
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
-—I can’t help but have the horrible feeling it may be for “environmental” reasons—like “green” bullets-—
29
posted on
02/14/2008 9:24:50 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: YouGoTexasGirl
30
posted on
02/14/2008 9:25:20 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
To: montag813
Coverup.
Alien’s have taken over the device and were planning a covert insertion. good thing it was discovered.
That’s why the government secretly funds concept SCI-FI movies from obscure screewriters. We have stories that lay-out a scenario, it is made into a move (AVP) and then if it really happens, nobody believes it. ingenious.
31
posted on
02/14/2008 9:26:20 AM PST
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
To: MeanWestTexan
And that said, who cares?
Anybody who puts a functioning satellite in orbit would be my first guess but I could be wrong. /s/
32
posted on
02/14/2008 9:27:21 AM PST
by
saganite
(Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
>Cool
When normal people
shoot up an old TV set,
you have a few beers
and make it game.
The Feds should let the Navy
make it a contest,
let two task forces
try to shoot down the space junk,
winner gets shore leave . . .
To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!There are going to be more and more business opportunities for getting rid of space junk. The most interesting sounding idea I've heard (not really a new one) is to electromagnetically push it away from one's vehicle/satellite. Sort of like an electromagnetic bumper. Although I'm not an expert, or well versed in the feasibility of this.
34
posted on
02/14/2008 9:29:24 AM PST
by
squidly
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
The resulting cloud of debris will be in the same decaying orbit as the original satellite. (Less a few bits and pieces that might get enough kinetic energy to move into a higher orbit.) The mess will burn up in the atmosphere. The Chinese blew up a satellite that was in a higher, more stable orbit. Their debris is also in that higher, more stable orbit.
35
posted on
02/14/2008 9:29:41 AM PST
by
Redcloak
("A plague o' both your houses!")
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Is this satellite in a polar orbit - launched from Vandenberg?
USA-193's inclination is 58.5 degrees so isn't "that" polar. The most northerly it gets is Hudson Bay, central Siberia. South end of the orbit gets a far south as the southern tip of South America.
36
posted on
02/14/2008 9:30:07 AM PST
by
plsvn
To: saganite
Functioning satellites in that orbit has one particular purpose.
37
posted on
02/14/2008 9:31:13 AM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
To: montag813
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the options will not be publicly discussed until a later Pentagon briefing.
can't anybody keep their mouths shut ?
To: Tulsa Ramjet
Or - the Russians or Chinese have been able to hack into the software. I’m surprised these satellites don’t have a self-destruct device.
39
posted on
02/14/2008 9:31:23 AM PST
by
Brian S. Fitzgerald
("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
To: montag813
Check.
This is the Standard Missile variant developed by the Navy to create a sea-based theater anti-ballistic capability for the Missile Defense Agency. It has been successfully tested a number of times.
Shooting down the satellite should be a piece of cake given its size.
40
posted on
02/14/2008 9:31:32 AM PST
by
Captain Rhino
( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
IM transcript:
PutinKremlin3: d00d! u shot my sat!
WThePrez: p0wn3d! LOL
PutinKremlin3:u r teh suq
WThePrez: all ur sats are belong to us
To: saganite
>Anybody who puts a functioning satellite in orbit would be my first guess but I could be wrong
Don't worry -- Freepers
always put their satellites
in high orbit and
design their birds with
active defense protocols . . .
The forum is safe.
To: rhombus
Everything on Earth orbit will come down sooner or later.
43
posted on
02/14/2008 9:33:18 AM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
(John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!I don't know how to tell you this, but vacuum cleaners don't work in a vacuum.
44
posted on
02/14/2008 9:33:22 AM PST
by
coloradan
(The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: nascarnation
Nope. Venezuelans perhaps.
45
posted on
02/14/2008 9:35:21 AM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: stylin19a
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, because the information released was Sensitive Compartmented Information.
46
posted on
02/14/2008 9:35:37 AM PST
by
coloradan
(The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: saganite
Maybe we should just hire the Chinese to shoot down the broken satilite...you know jobs Americans wont do.
47
posted on
02/14/2008 9:38:41 AM PST
by
svcw
(The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
To: montag813
Since it’s our money paying for this, we need good, cool video.
48
posted on
02/14/2008 9:38:43 AM PST
by
JennysCool
(They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!I don't think a vacuum cleaner would work in a vacuum. But I was just thinking about that very thing -- how about several satellites sweeping around the earth with big aerogel panels on the front? That should capture the smaller particles.
To: ReignOfError
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson