“Aren’t you the friendly newbie on the thread! Sorry for posting a blurb but I had something I needed to take care of and I tend to assume that posters to this forum will read the other posts in the thread and possibly do a little research on their own. BTW...I’m glad to know you’re the most experienced poster on FR. By the look of your signup date I think not! “
First of all, I’m not a newbie as I have been posting for much longer than you have. I just changed my screen name. Besides, even if I was new WTH difference does it make? Would it make my argument any less valid? I guess when you don’t have a sensible response you look for someones sign on date. Brilliant strategy. BTW, if you don’t like my tone, it’s just a response to yours.
” Are you an Obama troll? Where have you been when the abundance of articles have been posted on this forum citing his socialist, Marxist platforms, his $845 billion tax on Americans to support global poverty through UN administration, his wife’s comment that our souls need to be fixed, and the following quotes from Michele futher up the thread:”
Calling someone a troll is another thing a loser does when he cant counter an argument. If you check my posts you will see how ridiculous your accusation is. Obama may be a marxist, socialist, etc., so is Hellary. There is not an ounce of difference between them in policy. What makes Hellary wose is that she is a ruthless hatefilled witch who will stop at nothing to implement her policies. Obama is a harmless young mutton head who will get nothing done, Hellary is Stalin in a pantsuit.
posted on 02/16/2008 11:25:20 AM PST
(Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
Before you jump to conclusions, please read the entirety of my post as I am interested in your opinion, whether you like mine or not. I just don't appreciate being your whipping boy when I make statements with which you disagree.
You set the tone for our "conversation". Just because you didn't like my comment that Obama was the worst of two evils, you countered that I made the stupidest post of the day and/or week. That is your opinion and you are entitled to it, but I also have the right to my opinion. By voicing an opinion that you disagree with, you immediately countered by throwing insults. Remember this?
Congratulations on the what Im sure will be the stupidest post of the day (and possibly the week). Perhaps you were living under a rock for the 8 years that the 2 most evil, sociopathic people in the history of American politics ran the White House? What has Obama done that could be called evil when compared to the the daily works of the Satanic two-some?
This used to be a forum where discourse could be civil, but if you have been around as long as you say you have, you will remember those days. And as for the troll question (please note the question mark at the end - no period or exclamation mark), I inquired because you immediately flamed me because you didn't like my comment. Of course, with your extended history here, I'm sure you are aware of the abundance of shills and trolls who have registered on the forum in recent years.
It is easy to forget when posting online that readers of the post can not or do not pick up on the tone or intention of the poster. When I initially made my post about his evilness you must have interpreted my thoughts on Obama as being an attack on you, because I can think of no other logic for your response. It was NOT meant as an attack on you, only a comment on him.
I guess when you dont have a sensible response you look for someones sign on date.
If you think it wasn't a sensible response to provide you a direct link to one of the largest files on Obama then you either did not read my post or you do not care to know anything adverse against Obama.
By the way, you have yet to post anything informative on this thread but are so ready to flame someone else who disagrees with your opinion of Obama. IMO, he IS the worst of two evils. That is MY opinion and I will stand by it. If you fail to agree that I am entitled to my own opinion then you do not belong on this forum IMO. For supporting documentation on Obama, please read the thread and the contents at the link provided.
Obama may be a marxist, socialist, etc., so is Hellary. There is not an ounce of difference between them in policy.
Now with your first statement we have common ground, but I disagree that there is no difference between the two. Due to 8 years of the first Clinton, we know how horrendous a Hillary presidency could be. Part of the danger with Obama is his newness and lack of history with which to combat his candidacy during the general. His style and oratory skills lend much to the hype and religious ferver surrounding his cult of followers. Conservatives do remember Hillary and her ambitions and, IMO, will fight tooth and nail to prevent her ascendency to the Office. But Obama will be a harder candidate to defeat. I would be interested in hearing your opinion on the best approach to defeat Obama and how best to proceed.
posted on 02/16/2008 1:38:56 PM PST
(CONGRESS.SYS corrupted...Re-boot Washington DC (Y/N)?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson