Posted on 02/17/2008 10:45:07 PM PST by Dawnsblood
That’s just ridiculous. If any SINGLE person was responsible for those deaths it would be Jefferson Davis.
1. Jimmuh Cahtuh...hands down THE worst of any era.
2. Clinton...not far behind, soiled the office, criminally...sold out the country, ignored not just threats but actual great harm to the Republic.
3. LBJ...for all the reasons previously listed.
Unsurprisingly, all modern hypocrats...anyone else see the trend of destructive liberalism?
How do you tell your kid that there are people in the world who have no morals or ethics and one of them just happens to be the President of their country?
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” - Mark Twain
LBJ and Carter (who made the way for) Clintoon.
Karter
Klinton
Kennedy
Buchanan, James
Carter, Jimmy
Clinton, William
Johnson, Lyndon
There is a distinct separation between these four and the next worst (probably Harding).
The most revealing thing about the list is that it includes the three most recent Democrat presidents. All of them presidents who -- through either corruption or incompetence -- did serious, lasting physical damage to the country.
It's not a record that a political party should be proud of.
Clinton
Carter
FDR
Jimmy Carter was the worst. He started this hell called radical islam. clinton was 2nd because he enabled it. FDR because he started the welfare state that has destroyed the moral fiber of this country.
Carter = worst ever
how I rank the presidents serving during my lifetime.
Reagan
Eisenhower
Nixon-JFK
(big gap)
Ford, kinda invisible
(big gap)
GHWB
GWB-Clinton
(big gap)
Carter
LBJ
don’t agree with Washington; Nixon made the bad mistake of choosing evil companions (not Liddy). Other than that, your list is good.
In these enlightened modern times, one can get away with comparing Davis to other presidents. Wasn't so in old Lincolndom.
"The Democratic Evening Journal published an editorial comparing Lincoln unfavorably with Jefferson Davis. Major General Robert C. Schenck, commander of the troops in Baltimore, ordered the arrest of Albert Boileau, the Journals editor, and the suppression of the offending newspaper." [Source]
Fifty years from now, I think that historians will look back at the last sixteen years and be shocked at the inaction of Clinton administration against rising Islamic militarism and praise George W. for correctly perceiving the threat.
His argument is that Buchanan should have "done something" about slavery ... well, what? It had been clear for decades that a war was coming. Buchanan may well have been ineffective, but the Civil War was not his fault.
As for Johnson ... well, it's a strange sort of "bottom" when the fellow gets there by being an extraordinarily effective president in the very areas that the author dislikes. True, the results were not good. But unlike Carter, Johnson was a very effective chief executive.
FDR was the bottom.
Thanks for the socialism road Frank!
Carter, Buchanan and Johnson were all debacles, but those two missing skycrapers in lower Manhatten attest to the frivolity of the Clinton years.
Any freakin idiot could have done that. NO! NO! Any freakin idoit that didn't do that under those conditions should have been shot! Don't give someone credit for something that falls in their lap!
Then feel free to do so. Where would you rank a president with policies like his?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.