Posted on 02/21/2008 1:58:58 PM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - John McCain sought to minimize damage to his man-of-character image and his presidential hopes Thursday, vigorously denying and denouncing a newspaper report suggesting an improper relationship with a female lobbyist.
"It's not true," the likely Republican nominee said of the report that implied a romantic link with telecommunications lobbyist Vicki Iseman and suggested McCain pushed legislation that would have benefited her clients.
"At no time have I ever done anything that would betray the public trust," said McCain, a four-term Arizona senator and a hero of the Vietnam War. He described the lobbyist as a friend.
McCain and his wife, standing together at a news conference, said they were disappointed that The New York Times ran its page one article, and his campaign referred to a "smear campaign" and "gutter politics" in the midst of the presidential race.
The allegations in the Thursday report in the Times — and a story in The Washington Post — contradict core themes of McCain's campaign — that he would bring honor and integrity to the White House as well as a record of changing business-as-usual Washington ways.
Even the suggestion of marital impropriety — though rejected by both McCain and his wife — would seem to risk further damaging his acrimonious relationship with the social conservatives whose support he desperately needs in the general election campaign against a fired-up Democratic Party.
In a twist, however, there were early signs that the brouhaha might actually help McCain solidify the GOP base.
Conservative pundits who are some of McCain's harshest critics could have jumped on the issue to question the strength of McCain's family values. Instead, they went after the Times.
"There is nothing in it here that you can say is true," Rush Limbaugh told his radio listeners. He accused the newspaper of "trying to take him out." Another conservative voice, Laura Ingraham, contended the newspaper was trying to "contaminate" the GOP's nominee with an "absurd attack."
By Thursday afternoon, the Arizona senator had begun a fundraising appeal based on the story.
"The New York Times ... has shown once again that it cannot exercise good journalistic judgment when it comes to dealing with a conservative Republican," campaign manager Rick Davis wrote in an e-mail to supporters. "We need your help to counteract the liberal establishment and fight back against The New York Times by making an immediate contribution today."
"We think the story speaks for itself," Times Executive Editor Bill Keller said in a written statement. "On the timing, our policy is we publish stories when they are ready."
At the very least, the episode gives Democrats an opening to try to exploit McCain's decades-long ties to Washington even though he's known as a Republican lawmaker willing to stand up to special interests and reduce the influence of lobbyists. It's a reputation he has carefully honed in the aftermath of the Keating Five influence-peddling scandal decades ago. The Senate cited him for "poor judgment" in that matter but took no further action.
The Democratic National Committee said Thursday in a statement: "After 25 years in Washington, the real John McCain is just like the other D.C. insiders he rails against on the campaign trail. John McCain's 'do as I say, not as I do' approach to ethics and lobbying reform can be called a lot of things. 'Straight talk' isn't one of them."
Campaigning in Texas, Democrat Barack Obama declined to comment on the story.
Several Republicans unaffiliated with McCain's campaign doubted it would have a long-term effect.
"The fact that it was The New York Times and the lack of sufficient detail undermines the credibility of the story," said Christopher LaCivita, a Republican strategist in Virginia, noting that the Times is considered a liberal boogyman for the GOP rank-and-file. He added: "Barring anything coming out that's new, I don't see this having much impact on McCain because his character is so well established."
"Most Republicans will look at this is The New York Times sliming Republicans," agreed John Feehery, a Republican consultant who was an aide to former House Speaker Dennis Hastert. "If there is going to be lasting damage, it's going to be with independents."
Aware of the high stakes, McCain officials acted quickly. The campaign distributed statements deriding the story, deployed senior advisers to spread that message on TV news shows and arranged a news conference for McCain and his wife of nearly 28 years to personally address the matter as they campaigned in Toledo, Ohio.
"I'm very disappointed in the article," he told reporters.
Added Cindy McCain: "My children and I not only trust my husband but know that he would never do anything to not only disappoint our family, but disappoint the people of America. He's a man of great character, and I'm very, very disappointed in The New York Times."
In the article, months in the making, anonymous McCain aides were quoted as having urged McCain and Iseman to stay away from each other in the run-up to his failed presidential campaign in 2000. In a separate story in The Washington Post, John Weaver, a longtime aide who split with McCain last year, said he personally met with Iseman and asked her to steer clear of the senator some eight years ago.
Both stories said aides worried about the appearance of McCain having close ties to a lobbyist with business before the Commerce Committee. The stories also said McCain wrote letters and pushed legislation involving television station ownership that would have benefited Iseman's clients.
McCain said he was not aware of Weaver's meeting and no staffers had indicated to him they were concerned about his association with Iseman. "If they were, they didn't communicate that to me," McCain said Thursday.
He called Iseman a friend, and said he wasn't any closer to her than to other lobbyists. He said, "I have many friends who represent various interests, ranging from the firemen to the police to senior citizens to various interests, particularly before my committee."
Efforts to reach Iseman for comment were unsuccessful.
McCain had briefly addressed the issue — and defended his integrity — in December when questioned about reports that the Times was investigating allegations of legislative favoritism.
"I've never done any favors for anybody — lobbyist or special-interest group," he told reporters after the Drudge Report posted a story online that said his aides had been trying to dissuade the newspaper from publishing a story because, the aides said, it wasn't factual.
McCain aides say they were taken off guard Wednesday afternoon when they learned the paper would publish the story. They suggested the Times was prompted to publish the story after learning that The New Republic, a conservative publication, was readying an article about newsroom debate over the story at the newspaper.
___
EDITOR'S NOTE — Liz Sidoti covers the presidential race for The Associated Press.
My guess would be that this is just a taste of what is to come when he officially becomes the “nominee.”
Republican presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., accompanied by his wife Cindy, speaks at a news conference in Toledo, Ohio, Thursday, Feb. 21, 2008, to respond to allegations by the New York Times of impropriety with a female lobbyist. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
“Analysis” = Let’s try to keep this going and give it more impact than the Times story had.
Campaigning in Texas, Democrat Barack Obama declined to comment on the story.
______________________________________________
That’s because (Larry Sinclair) Obama has his own (Larry Sinclair) skeletons to keep in his closet.
(Larry Sinclair)
McCain does not consider the state of his fidelity to his wife to be part of the public trust.
I would hate to live next door to anyone that considers that far-left fish-wrap 'conservative.' ;o)
Republican presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., sits in a Ford Focus as he tours the Ford Motor Company Wayne Assembly Plant in Wayne, Mich. Thursday, Feb. 21, 2008. His wife Cindy is at right. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
Interesting that democrats are so identified with every sleazy angle, no revelation of their wrongdoing can have much significance.
obama’s shady real estate deals are not an issue, but this is.
figures. Also, the words ‘Keating 5’ were brought up today for the first time in over a decade on CNN.
he is for all intents and purposes...why now instead of right before november? The story is something that allegedly 8 years ago.
Lame choice of words. Very disappointed? What was he expecting from the NYT?
Obviously, his relationship with his wife does not involve any 'trust.'
I can’t figure this one out.
McCain is the presumptive nominee but not there yet. If the intent of the Old Gray Whore is to take him out? Why print the article now?
Why not a few weeks ago before the primaries that garnered the delegates?
Why not in August or September when people are really paying attention.
Something is not right about all this.
Does it matter?
McCain = Dukakis.
IMO, that is all this is about right now. Milking a non story for all it's worth.
This one is just to get things warmed up. There will be more, and bigger ones, I'm certain of that.
The MSM made John McCain, now they are ready to break him!
This is just the tip of the ice berg for John McCain, JMO.
are you thinking what I’m thinking...?
“We think the story speaks for itself,” - Times Executive Editor Bill Keller
Most made-up stories do, Bill.
Note: You can’t spell Pravda without AP.
Oh, wait. That was only for a Democrat President. sorry.
New Republic or some such rag was going to do a story on the story - basically taking a shot at the NYT for sitting on it.
Liberal media actually espouses that republicans are fair game on scandals, because supposedly republicans promote "family values" whereas democrats are open scumbags.
Of course this is pure BS, I believe Bill Clinton ran on family values, and Hilary,Obama, Edwards have all bellied up to the pulpit and extensively lied about how much they pray, etc.
but they’ll be like the boy who cried wolf.
some folks want to see “spoiled” product delivered in the fall, I reckun.. and don’t mind offending in the pursuit of their own agenda,, the NYT serves no one well with their own chaotic and reckless behaviour.
Oh well, I guess it is all jsut so much political theater after all, just seems more dastardly now then it used to when practiced.. all these dang 7X24 news channels and such to feed.. ya lose a lot in quality along the way.
I listened to both Rush and Hannity today and they definitely tore this story apart as they should. What I didn’t hear, at least when I was listening, was either of them acknowledge that despite it being a garbage story, the MSM will still run with it tonight on every outlet.
This particular story is likely intended to remind voters that McCain had an affair during his first marriage, and possibly raise a suspicion he may have repeated his earlier behavior.
McCain’s voting record has already received much scrutiny within the Republican Party.
McCain's age and health will be the next major news stories regarding his personal life. Separately, they wouldn't carry much weight with voters. Combined, they could be devastating.
I think IF McCain plays it right there can be a backlash against the media and dems for these stories. He has a good reputation at the moment, which they are trying to deconstruct, and he needs to do something similar to what Obama does when he deflects criticisms as his opponent playing the race card.
Starting in The Sunday New York Times a 10 part expose’: McCain - What we knew then we wish we knew now so we could hit him over the head with it tomorrow.
.
--
Politico.com
.
Tomorrows New York Times headline:
‘Sources: Lobbyist was Surrogate
Mom for McCain-Alien Baby!’
I'm just reminding everyone the dem party is heavily involved in these stories, do NOT be fooled into thinking they are legitimate exercises in reporting. The DUI story hurt W with conservatives, please note his drinking and that story have never been of any significance during his presidency.
Who will offer the backlash? Conservatives already don’t trust the media and the left is probably applauding the attack. I say it’s a wash, but I hope McCain learns a lesson about the media from this.
Weird how Cindy stayed by his side like a nurse making sure the poor guy would not fall. I saw her recently help McCain off the airplane. Her smiling was also odd and heavy makeup more suited for a cocktail waitress.
There is a buzz about how the meeting ended and they left. I am not sure what that is about since I did not see it but just clips.
McCain has to create the backlash basically by proclaiming “an honorable man has been dishonored”. He needs to trade on his honest reputation and make them pay for assailing it, before they ruin it.
>>In a twist, however, there were early signs that the brouhaha might actually help McCain solidify the GOP base. <<
Psychology is an interesting thing. When I first digested this story I told my wife this is the sort of thing that just may make me actually go to the polls and vote for him.
But I still won’t.
I find it interesting that it had that initial impact on me though.
Saturdays New York Times headline:
‘Sources: McCain has 43 Mexican Woman Harem
Collecting Illegal Welfare For Campaign Funds’
I understand that. But while McCain initiates it, the assumption is that the public becomes the backlash against the media. I’m just saying that I doubt the NYTimes is worried. Conservatives already don’t trust them. Liberals don’t care so long as the newspaper remains devoted to their causes. The liberals will probably give the story writers an award. That’s how they operate.
NYT is not the real objective, they are a lost cause. The objective is public opinion among conservatives and swing voters. The objective is always swaying voters.
Sundays New York Times headline:
‘Sources: McCain At AIDS/Abortion Costume
Fund Raiser Dressed as Ruth Mengele Ginsburg’
I could not believe he said it. Makes me think there is more of the story to come. While there was not much to NYT article, his attempt to defend himself was pathetic.
McCain appears in poor health and lacking in vigor. I saw Cindy help him off the plane. He speaks as if about to take a nap. He looks (and moves) much older than his years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.