Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Homosexual Booklet to Be Distributed to All 16,000 US School Districts
LifeSiteNews ^ | 2/21/08 | Hillary White

Posted on 02/21/2008 4:32:13 PM PST by wagglebee

US, February 21, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - At the same time that news has come out that the Toronto Catholic School board has refused to participate in pro-homosexual activities, homosexual activists are making significant inroads in US schools, as a booklet titled, "Just the Facts about Sexual Orientation and Youth," is set to be distributed to all 16,000 school districts in the country.

The 24-page booklet by the National Education Association and American Psychological Association, tells students that homosexuality is a "normal expression of human sexuality".

"What's so scary and dogmatic about this report is that it communicates that religious-based viewpoints are harmful, and even dangerous," said Candi Cushman, education analyst for Focus on the Family Action.

The booklet particularly targets the idea that homosexuality is a condition that can be changed. It instructs educators, "Schools should be careful to avoid discussions of transformational ministry in their curriculum."

Brian Raum, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, said that the talk of "inclusivity" in schools by homosexual groups is a veiled threat.

"What they're trying to do is create a fear factor here," he said. "There's nothing in the Constitution that would prohibit a teacher from presenting to a student all of the programs that are available, without endorsing or promoting any particular one."

The National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, (NARTH) says that although "the aim of gay-affirmative counselling programs is humanitarian", the problem is that they do "much more" than discouraging scapegoating.

"In reality, they promote a particular worldview," present students with a set of "truth-claims that students are expected to adopt," and insist on conformity to these.

"These programs promote the value systems of a particular social group and denigrate the views of another, while at the same time, distorting science."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2recruit; 4recruiting; adf; apa; celebrateperversity; censorship; education; gayagenda; gays; hatecrimes; homosexualagenda; homosexuallinks; indoctrination; indotrination; moralabsolutes; narth; nea; propaganda; psychology; publiceducation; publicschools; publikskoolz; pushingperversion; queerworldview; schools; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren; thoughtpolice; tolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: longtermmemmory
Why don’t conservative groups issue a counter NON RELIGIOUS book to the same schools?

Because the schools would refuse to issue them.

61 posted on 02/22/2008 6:52:03 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Who gave them permission to distribute this garbage?


62 posted on 02/22/2008 6:55:19 AM PST by No Dems 2004 (No Dems in 2008 either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004

It’s the NEA, they don’t need permission to push their agenda on their members.


63 posted on 02/22/2008 7:13:34 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Why what?


64 posted on 02/22/2008 7:14:44 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

that is irrelevant.

here is what would happen.

The schools would have the prohomosexual polics book and the pro-science view on sexual behavior. Rather than have the debate , both books might be scrapped or both books released.

Do nothing and they can say the science debate is over (ala algore) and dismiss any other views.

as it stands now, only one side of the argument ever goes out. we have conservative types, women in particular, who just go with the “born that way” falicy.


65 posted on 02/22/2008 7:25:15 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I will. I didn’t see the link.


66 posted on 02/22/2008 7:45:27 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

What age group is this intended for?


67 posted on 02/22/2008 8:08:22 AM PST by Marie (Why is it that some people believe everything that happens is the will of G-d - except Israel?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennteacher
sexual orientation is - not my business. But this is blatant social engineering, not education.

I know that it would be a hardship for many people, however, parents would do well to keep their kids out of public schools at all cost. You only have one chance to raise your kids.

68 posted on 02/22/2008 8:10:30 AM PST by outofstyle (There's a rake at the gates of Hell tonight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Scratch deeper and you’ll find that SEICUS and other sex positive government funded groups don’t care about morality in sex. The whole damned point of the sex positive agenda is to end all moral judgements over sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s). They see sex as a birthright and that everyone should be sexually active at every age.

The “genetic” origin is a ruse. They could care less. There is no genetic trait for cross dressing. We are born naked. There is no genetic trait for rape fantasy in BDSM.

They DON’T CARE about your morals. They corrupt minors.


69 posted on 02/23/2008 8:47:43 AM PST by weegee (Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA
Where does it say that this will be given to the children?

"The 24-page booklet by the National Education Association and American Psychological Association, tells students..."

"It instructs educators..."

It looks like it's for both the students and the teachers.

70 posted on 02/23/2008 9:06:08 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Don't let Bill back into the White House to defile it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

I have read the entire brochure. It is to the administrators and teachers only. Never meant to be read by any student. It is well thought out and documented. You may not agree with what it says, but it certainly presents the facts of the situation quite well.


71 posted on 02/24/2008 1:13:57 PM PST by seprgs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson