Posted on 02/22/2008 12:54:53 AM PST by Kurt Evans
“Here’s a good slogan for you: ‘Vote Huckabee - Hunter ‘08....And Send the Message that Republicans Want Socialism, too!’”
You seem to think you sound smart, but you don’t. Educate yourself:
http://mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Issues.Home
“what is your point. mac had a lot of fun so what”
My point is to make other conservatives aware of these allegations.
“Why did you cut this part out?”
Mainly because I support Governor Huckabee.
“McCain and ol’ Huckers are in cahoots.”
That claim is absurd.
“Yeah, I’m a lousy pilot and like girls too, whats yer point?”
As I said in post #182, my point is to make other conservatives aware of these allegations.
“McCain’s actions that day were heroic ...”
Do you have a source? What I’ve read suggests the opposite.
“Howard Phillips is a nut case, too.”
Howard Phillips is an American hero.
The only good news about all of the “negatives” about everyone that’s running for POTUS is that all of these things are being seriously discussed right now, long before November 4. It will be interesting to see what mindset the majority of conservative voters have and what mindset the majority of the voting general public have by November 4. Will things truly change between now and November 4, and who knows for sure one way or the other?
“There is not one word in your sentence that shows McCain to be a mad man...”
You quoted more than one sentence, and none of them were mine:
http://newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin426.htm
“Did he steal your girlfriend?”
No, but he apparently might if he had the chance.
“The question all should be asking is how did a left wing liberal like Mac become the republican front runner in the first place?”
Fred Thompson stayed in the race through South Carolina—even though by that time he had no chance or intention of winning—to help his old buddy McCain. Then the media, including ostensibly conservative outlets, insisted on trying to sell baby-killer Mitt Romney as the only legitimate alternative to McCain, even though Romney has roughly the same amount of charisma as a garden yam.
“So does he support Obama?”
I’m not sure there’s any way for me to know that.
“Are you and the rest of the malcontents going to continue to hammer McCain during the general election to insure we get something much worse for CinC, US policy setter, SCOTUS nominator, etc.?”
No, but if he won the nomination, I might continue to hammer him in an attempt to get something better.
“Hunter was my first choice, I think so much less of him since you posted this...”
And I think less of you because you posted that.
“Enough of this ******, once and for all. It makes this board look like the Daily Kos for **********.”
You don’t exactly improve Free Republic by taking Christ’s name in vain.
“I guess this guy would much rather have Obi-bam-kenobi, eh?”
As I said in post #190, I’m not sure there’s any way for me to know that.
“And do you and Ted think that Obama or Hitlery is fit to be CIC?”
I definitely don’t.
“But what do we do when faced with TWO Presidential candidates who are both clearly unfit to be Commander-in-Chief??”
Generally I vote for the candidate I believe is most fit, even if that’s not a major-party candidate.
As Howie Carr would, "Go screw!"
You keep publishing this tripe and in the end all you do is drive away people. At the same time I will never be able to take anything from Sampley seriously. So if you think posting daily multiple pro-Huckabee articles in conjunction with a couple negative McCain articles is gonna make up the delegate deficit or (because it won't) lead to a contested convention and Huckabee will ride to the rescue, then you and your ilk are in for a big surprise. Huckabee will not even be the VP (Thank God)
I will celebrate the day Huckabee is finished.
Is that allowed?
You have to be kidding. Who do you work for? Dan Rather. Your statement is unfair and who knows if this article is accurate or wishful thinking on the part of the author.
Howard Phillips is a nutcase in his own right. Don't get me started on Howard Phillips and the Constitutional Party. I know they're charlatans. They're delusional and only want to separate people from their hard-earned money and give them false hopes and to make them feel morally superior until they realize they've been duped.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.