Skip to comments.Hillary Defies Judge’s Mandate, That She Must Testify in LA COURT HOUSE!
Posted on 02/22/2008 6:34:42 AM PST by OPS4
There was an extraordinary development at a hearing today in Los Angeles Superior Court in the Paul v Clinton et al civil fraud case against Bill and Hillary Clinton, prosecuted by Hillarys largest donor Peter Paul. When Judge Munoz finally allowed Paul to commence discovery after a three year appellate hiatus, Hillary Clintons attorney declared that none of Hillary Clintons lawyers would accept a deposition subpoena on Hillarys behalf.
Hillary will be dodging process servers while she is campaigning for President of the United States around the nation!! The sworn testimony Paul is entitled to take from Hillary as a former defendant and material witness that the Judge specifically stated he will not allow to be denied, is now being officially thwarted by Senator Hillary R Clinton!
Hillary has now made history again in her contempt for the Rule of Law. She has become the first US Senator and candidate for president of the United States on record to declare she will be effectively dodging process servers to avoid testifying truthfully about fraudulent actions that she has never personally denied in the sworn declaration she filed in the case! http://www.peterfpaul.com/ ABC 20/20 Shows Hillary Clinton is the Liar In Illegalities Exposed By Top Donor Peter Paul ABC 20/20 Corroborates Peter Paul Against Hillary ClintonSeven years ago Peter Paul began whistleblowing to the government and alerting the media of numerous illegalities committed by Hillary and Bill Clinton in order to win Hillarys first election to public office. The multi-million dollar donor to Hillarys Senate campaign that caused Hillarys finance director to be indicted and tried in May, 2005, for hiding his contributions, and whose complaint to the FEC resulted in a finding that Hillarys campaign broke the law resulting in the only FEC fine imposed against Hillarys campaign, will begin the discovery process leading to a trial in Los Angeles later this year of the Clintons and others for destroying Pauls public company. http://www.peterfpaul.com/2008/02/16/abc-2020-shows-hillary-clinton-is-the-liar-in-illegalities-exposed-by-top-donor-peter-paul/
Ooooh that would be sweet...but never happen.
Would be nice if she was questioned about it though.
She has Secret Service Protection as the former first lady and candidate. The Process Server wouldn’t be able to get within 30 feet of her.
This should be fun to watch when the process servers repeatedly encounter her Secret Service detail.
Yuh. I’m holding my breath till this actually happens.
Obama should bring it up.
With the load of dirty campaign money that was not sucessfully laundered in both Hillary and Barry’s past political dealings, the NYT finds McCain’s “possible” favoritism toward a lobbyist’s company the fodder for a front page article.
When are we going to see similar stories on Paul and Hillary, or Barry and Rezko? You don’t have to rely on innuendo and phantom sources in either of those cases. Where’s the beef, NYT?
The media won’t even report it... why would they allow it to be served on one of their broadcasts?!
Now, what about all these folks that grab Hillery's arm or hand to tell her their sad stories?
I would love to see that.
Can you imagine the headlines if this were ANYBODY else in the nation? Little old you or I would probably be behind bars at this point awaiting extradition to California.
It would be easy to serve her papers. The process server can just go to the front of the rope line when she is signing autographs. Ask for an autograph, hand her the supeoana as if it where something to be signed, and just declare in from of thousands of witnesses that she has been served.
And the media yawned...
Maybe you could pass this on to the New York Times?
I’m sure they’d do a front page story on this!
I agree. This is not that impossible. What if the process server yells at her with a bullhorn from 25 feet away, “Hillary Clinton, you’ve been served” and then tosses the paper in her direction, would not that count?
“be fun to watch”
Yup! Video every attempt, and put them on Youtube!
A US Marshal could do this ... and anyone attempting to interfere would be arrested.
I think there is a requirement that the papers actually get into the hands of the target or their representative. If the papers are mailed, she can say she never received them. Its best to pay your local sheriff to do the dirty work for you.
I suspect a Federal Marshall can get to her.
Yep, out in the hallway, David Kendall told Peter’s counsel that he would not cooperate in any way. He will not accept service for her.
I could be wrong, but aren’t the SS agents sworn law enforcement officers? Despite this being a civil issue, aren’t they obligated to not interfere with the process service?
Where is the next debate or campaign stop in Texas?
Did he say why?
I guess the court will have to assign her one then.
Obama should bring it up.
Beat me to it.
Of course in my vision, the process server is a woman who gushes about how much Hillary has done for women and what an honor it is to meet her, until the very moment Hillary takes the papers. She immediately turns stern and tells Hillary that she has been served, together with all the usual formalities, preferably all on camera with several news networks, preferably live on at least one.
That’s good! Talk about things coming around full circle - a one more ‘in your face’ moment.
Actually, no. There is such a thing as "drop service". If you have someone who refuses to take the subpoena from you, you can drop it at their feet and complete the service that way. Especially if this is done at a public event, she can't say she wasn't properly served.
“”Now, what about all these folks that grab Hillery’s arm or hand to tell her their sad stories?””
Excellent....I would have thought no one could get that close to her but she keeps relating stories about people coming up to her or is she lying? It does look as though people get pretty close to her when she’s in diners.
Realizing, of course, the x42's are flagrant deniers of the law.
And 99.9% of her secret service agents hate her guts. I’m sure they would help in this matter.
The process should be served by the (elected) Sheriff, personally, escorted by his entire force of deputies. In uniform, with cameras.
If the SS objects, they could be arrested for obstruction of justice.
It would be a hoot.
I am trying to find it. I’ll post it ASAP!
Kendall is trying to make sure she never testifies. He turned in to the court a false declaration on her behalf. He is going to move for summary judgment to again try to throw out the case. Representing the Clinton Crime Family, Kendall is the attorney for this political mob.
‘cept maybe at a rope line... with a blank envelope and a marker.. “Please can I get your autograph??? You’ve been served.”
Get the cops from 'Law & Order' to serve the subpoena or to make the arrest. They always do it in very public places to embarrass the hell out of them.
What I'm looking for is the penalty for the actor when the server KNOWS the actor is knowingly and willfully dodging being served. (not very legalese ... but you get the picture)
Maybe not.....these folks spend their working lives serving people who do not want to be served. They can be very inventive.
Good luck to them!
The b***h has it coming.
Why, hell, if they wouldn’t indict her for murder, tampering with evidence, illegal cattle futures trading, grand theft, witness tampering, perjury, suborning of perjury, slander, and obstruction of justice, why would she worry about being subpoenaed for a crummy little court appearance . . . Sir Madam Shrillery, Her Royal Thighness, just doesn’t want to go to court . . . so, there! I mean, c’mon!
I would love to see Obama serve her at the beginning of the next debate as they walk toward each other to shake hands at the beginning.
I can fantasize, can't I?
If she is a party to a civil action than she has been served with the complaint and summons and is subject to the jurisdiction of the court and may only needs a notice to appear served on her attorney?
The more he tries to help the cover up and the more the federal election commission helps him, the bigger the scandal gets as the cover up and corruption continue, one of the larger Media Outlets will pick it up, because being complicit in not reporting will eventually cause a public uproar.
I am forwarding this to Drudge, and and then to the Drudge Retort, where Mike Barnicle links up, along wiht other yellow dogs.
We must tempt them with the news and evidence and maybe one of the outlets will feel the need to post the real news, about the Clintons, and the Hollywod Hustle.
Re: Yup! Video every attempt, and put them on Youtube!
I agree. Video them all. Then interview the server for an explanation and put them on YouTube.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.