Skip to comments.Hillary Defies Judge’s Mandate, That She Must Testify in LA COURT HOUSE!
Posted on 02/22/2008 6:34:42 AM PST by OPS4
There was an extraordinary development at a hearing today in Los Angeles Superior Court in the Paul v Clinton et al civil fraud case against Bill and Hillary Clinton, prosecuted by Hillarys largest donor Peter Paul. When Judge Munoz finally allowed Paul to commence discovery after a three year appellate hiatus, Hillary Clintons attorney declared that none of Hillary Clintons lawyers would accept a deposition subpoena on Hillarys behalf.
Hillary will be dodging process servers while she is campaigning for President of the United States around the nation!! The sworn testimony Paul is entitled to take from Hillary as a former defendant and material witness that the Judge specifically stated he will not allow to be denied, is now being officially thwarted by Senator Hillary R Clinton!
Hillary has now made history again in her contempt for the Rule of Law. She has become the first US Senator and candidate for president of the United States on record to declare she will be effectively dodging process servers to avoid testifying truthfully about fraudulent actions that she has never personally denied in the sworn declaration she filed in the case! http://www.peterfpaul.com/ ABC 20/20 Shows Hillary Clinton is the Liar In Illegalities Exposed By Top Donor Peter Paul ABC 20/20 Corroborates Peter Paul Against Hillary ClintonSeven years ago Peter Paul began whistleblowing to the government and alerting the media of numerous illegalities committed by Hillary and Bill Clinton in order to win Hillarys first election to public office. The multi-million dollar donor to Hillarys Senate campaign that caused Hillarys finance director to be indicted and tried in May, 2005, for hiding his contributions, and whose complaint to the FEC resulted in a finding that Hillarys campaign broke the law resulting in the only FEC fine imposed against Hillarys campaign, will begin the discovery process leading to a trial in Los Angeles later this year of the Clintons and others for destroying Pauls public company. http://www.peterfpaul.com/2008/02/16/abc-2020-shows-hillary-clinton-is-the-liar-in-illegalities-exposed-by-top-donor-peter-paul/
Ooooh that would be sweet...but never happen.
Would be nice if she was questioned about it though.
She has Secret Service Protection as the former first lady and candidate. The Process Server wouldn’t be able to get within 30 feet of her.
This should be fun to watch when the process servers repeatedly encounter her Secret Service detail.
Yuh. I’m holding my breath till this actually happens.
Obama should bring it up.
With the load of dirty campaign money that was not sucessfully laundered in both Hillary and Barry’s past political dealings, the NYT finds McCain’s “possible” favoritism toward a lobbyist’s company the fodder for a front page article.
When are we going to see similar stories on Paul and Hillary, or Barry and Rezko? You don’t have to rely on innuendo and phantom sources in either of those cases. Where’s the beef, NYT?
The media won’t even report it... why would they allow it to be served on one of their broadcasts?!
Now, what about all these folks that grab Hillery's arm or hand to tell her their sad stories?
I would love to see that.
Can you imagine the headlines if this were ANYBODY else in the nation? Little old you or I would probably be behind bars at this point awaiting extradition to California.
It would be easy to serve her papers. The process server can just go to the front of the rope line when she is signing autographs. Ask for an autograph, hand her the supeoana as if it where something to be signed, and just declare in from of thousands of witnesses that she has been served.
And the media yawned...
Maybe you could pass this on to the New York Times?
I’m sure they’d do a front page story on this!
I agree. This is not that impossible. What if the process server yells at her with a bullhorn from 25 feet away, “Hillary Clinton, you’ve been served” and then tosses the paper in her direction, would not that count?
“be fun to watch”
Yup! Video every attempt, and put them on Youtube!
A US Marshal could do this ... and anyone attempting to interfere would be arrested.