Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Defies Judge’s Mandate, That She Must Testify in LA COURT HOUSE!
PeterPaul Blog ^ | 2/22/08 | PeterPaul Blog

Posted on 02/22/2008 6:34:42 AM PST by OPS4

There was an extraordinary development at a hearing today in Los Angeles Superior Court in the Paul v Clinton et al civil fraud case against Bill and Hillary Clinton, prosecuted by Hillary’s largest donor Peter Paul. When Judge Munoz finally allowed Paul to commence discovery after a three year “appellate” hiatus, Hillary Clinton’s attorney declared that none of Hillary Clinton’s lawyers would accept a deposition subpoena on Hillary’s behalf.

Hillary will be dodging process servers while she is campaigning for President of the United States around the nation!! The sworn testimony Paul is entitled to take from Hillary as a former defendant and material witness that the Judge specifically stated he will not allow to be denied, is now being officially thwarted by Senator Hillary R Clinton!

Hillary has now made history again in her contempt for the Rule of Law. She has become the first US Senator and candidate for president of the United States on record to declare she will be effectively dodging process servers to avoid testifying truthfully about fraudulent actions that she has never personally denied in the sworn declaration she filed in the case! http://www.peterfpaul.com/ ABC 20/20 Shows Hillary Clinton is the “Liar” In Illegalities Exposed By Top Donor Peter Paul ABC 20/20 Corroborates Peter Paul Against Hillary ClintonSeven years ago Peter Paul began whistleblowing to the government and alerting the media of numerous illegalities committed by Hillary and Bill Clinton in order to win Hillary’s first election to public office. The multi-million dollar donor to Hillary’s Senate campaign that caused Hillary’s finance director to be indicted and tried in May, 2005, for hiding his contributions, and whose complaint to the FEC resulted in a finding that Hillary’s campaign broke the law resulting in the only FEC fine imposed against Hillary’s campaign, will begin the discovery process leading to a trial in Los Angeles later this year of the Clintons and others for destroying Paul’s public company. http://www.peterfpaul.com/2008/02/16/abc-2020-shows-hillary-clinton-is-the-liar-in-illegalities-exposed-by-top-donor-peter-paul/


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; crimes; elections; hillary; hillaryscandals; losangeles; paulvclinton; stophillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-143 next last
She should be served at the start of the next debate on National Television.
1 posted on 02/22/2008 6:34:44 AM PST by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Ooooh that would be sweet...but never happen.

Would be nice if she was questioned about it though.


2 posted on 02/22/2008 6:37:10 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Hillary = Senator Incitatus, Clintigula's whore...er, horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

She has Secret Service Protection as the former first lady and candidate. The Process Server wouldn’t be able to get within 30 feet of her.


3 posted on 02/22/2008 6:37:56 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

This should be fun to watch when the process servers repeatedly encounter her Secret Service detail.


4 posted on 02/22/2008 6:38:59 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Yuh. I’m holding my breath till this actually happens.


5 posted on 02/22/2008 6:39:08 AM PST by Steely Tom (Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
Lets just see if this story has any leg’s. She just keeps on giving
6 posted on 02/22/2008 6:40:08 AM PST by reefdiver (The sheriff of Nottingham collected taxes on behalf of the common good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Obama should bring it up.


7 posted on 02/22/2008 6:40:20 AM PST by octobersky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

With the load of dirty campaign money that was not sucessfully laundered in both Hillary and Barry’s past political dealings, the NYT finds McCain’s “possible” favoritism toward a lobbyist’s company the fodder for a front page article.
When are we going to see similar stories on Paul and Hillary, or Barry and Rezko? You don’t have to rely on innuendo and phantom sources in either of those cases. Where’s the beef, NYT?


8 posted on 02/22/2008 6:41:05 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

ping


9 posted on 02/22/2008 6:42:27 AM PST by GQuagmire (Giggety,Giggety,Giggety)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

The media won’t even report it... why would they allow it to be served on one of their broadcasts?!


10 posted on 02/22/2008 6:43:02 AM PST by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
The Process Server wouldn’t be able to get within 30 feet of her.

Now, what about all these folks that grab Hillery's arm or hand to tell her their sad stories?

11 posted on 02/22/2008 6:43:28 AM PST by DaveMSmith (Nothin' worse than a leaky dame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

I would love to see that.


12 posted on 02/22/2008 6:43:32 AM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Can you imagine the headlines if this were ANYBODY else in the nation? Little old you or I would probably be behind bars at this point awaiting extradition to California.


13 posted on 02/22/2008 6:43:45 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

It would be easy to serve her papers. The process server can just go to the front of the rope line when she is signing autographs. Ask for an autograph, hand her the supeoana as if it where something to be signed, and just declare in from of thousands of witnesses that she has been served.


14 posted on 02/22/2008 6:44:43 AM PST by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

And the media yawned...


15 posted on 02/22/2008 6:44:55 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Obama and Hillary - it's right there in black and white)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Hey!
Maybe you could pass this on to the New York Times?

I’m sure they’d do a front page story on this!


16 posted on 02/22/2008 6:47:36 AM PST by G Larry (HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

I agree. This is not that impossible. What if the process server yells at her with a bullhorn from 25 feet away, “Hillary Clinton, you’ve been served” and then tosses the paper in her direction, would not that count?


17 posted on 02/22/2008 6:48:05 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Serving her Thighness might be easier than you think. Make several campaign contributions in the process servers name, get invited to a fund raiser and serve her on greeting line.
Let her greed be her undoing, there’s still plenty of time.
18 posted on 02/22/2008 6:48:16 AM PST by John_Galt518 (Get off my phone you big dope! - Mark Levin (aka the Great One))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

“be fun to watch”
Yup! Video every attempt, and put them on Youtube!


19 posted on 02/22/2008 6:48:46 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

A US Marshal could do this ... and anyone attempting to interfere would be arrested.


20 posted on 02/22/2008 6:49:22 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

I think there is a requirement that the papers actually get into the hands of the target or their representative. If the papers are mailed, she can say she never received them. Its best to pay your local sheriff to do the dirty work for you.


21 posted on 02/22/2008 6:51:30 AM PST by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
Maybe Rick Lazio can do it.
22 posted on 02/22/2008 6:52:55 AM PST by stayathomemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

I suspect a Federal Marshall can get to her.


23 posted on 02/22/2008 6:54:12 AM PST by Montana4Jesus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: octobersky
Obama should bring it up.

Fat chance!

24 posted on 02/22/2008 6:55:09 AM PST by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

Yep, out in the hallway, David Kendall told Peter’s counsel that he would not cooperate in any way. He will not accept service for her.


25 posted on 02/22/2008 6:55:14 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

I could be wrong, but aren’t the SS agents sworn law enforcement officers? Despite this being a civil issue, aren’t they obligated to not interfere with the process service?


26 posted on 02/22/2008 6:55:35 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Where is the next debate or campaign stop in Texas?


27 posted on 02/22/2008 6:55:53 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stayathomemom
Maybe Rick Lazio can do it.

LOL! Perfect!

28 posted on 02/22/2008 6:56:31 AM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Did he say why?

I guess the court will have to assign her one then.


29 posted on 02/22/2008 6:58:20 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: octobersky

Obama should bring it up.

Or McCain.


30 posted on 02/22/2008 7:00:12 AM PST by chainsaw (Monica Lewinsky's ex-sex partner's wife for Pesident ?....No Muslim in the WH either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

Beat me to it.

Of course in my vision, the process server is a woman who gushes about how much Hillary has done for women and what an honor it is to meet her, until the very moment Hillary takes the papers. She immediately turns stern and tells Hillary that she has been served, together with all the usual formalities, preferably all on camera with several news networks, preferably live on at least one.


31 posted on 02/22/2008 7:00:41 AM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stayathomemom

That’s good! Talk about things coming around full circle - a one more ‘in your face’ moment.


32 posted on 02/22/2008 7:01:46 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
I think there is a requirement that the papers actually get into the hands of the target or their representative.

Actually, no. There is such a thing as "drop service". If you have someone who refuses to take the subpoena from you, you can drop it at their feet and complete the service that way. Especially if this is done at a public event, she can't say she wasn't properly served.

33 posted on 02/22/2008 7:02:36 AM PST by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

“”Now, what about all these folks that grab Hillery’s arm or hand to tell her their sad stories?””

Excellent....I would have thought no one could get that close to her but she keeps relating stories about people coming up to her or is she lying? It does look as though people get pretty close to her when she’s in diners.


34 posted on 02/22/2008 7:06:05 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
Rule 4 seems to be the basic understanding of process serving ... I'll continue looking

Realizing, of course, the x42's are flagrant deniers of the law.

35 posted on 02/22/2008 7:06:51 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM

And 99.9% of her secret service agents hate her guts. I’m sure they would help in this matter.


36 posted on 02/22/2008 7:06:58 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
This should be fun to watch when the process servers repeatedly encounter her Secret Service detail.

The process should be served by the (elected) Sheriff, personally, escorted by his entire force of deputies. In uniform, with cameras.

If the SS objects, they could be arrested for obstruction of justice.

It would be a hoot.

37 posted on 02/22/2008 7:07:07 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I am trying to find it. I’ll post it ASAP!


38 posted on 02/22/2008 7:07:27 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: knarf

TY knarf!


39 posted on 02/22/2008 7:08:30 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Kendall is trying to make sure she never testifies. He turned in to the court a false declaration on her behalf. He is going to move for summary judgment to again try to throw out the case. Representing the Clinton Crime Family, Kendall is the attorney for this political mob.


40 posted on 02/22/2008 7:10:49 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

‘cept maybe at a rope line... with a blank envelope and a marker.. “Please can I get your autograph??? You’ve been served.”


41 posted on 02/22/2008 7:10:56 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
"She should be served at the start of the next debate on National Television"

Get the cops from 'Law & Order' to serve the subpoena or to make the arrest. They always do it in very public places to embarrass the hell out of them.

42 posted on 02/22/2008 7:12:46 AM PST by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
I'm fascinated ...

A little more

What I'm looking for is the penalty for the actor when the server KNOWS the actor is knowingly and willfully dodging being served. (not very legalese ... but you get the picture)

43 posted on 02/22/2008 7:13:06 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
The Process Server wouldn't be able to get within 30 feet of her.

Maybe not.....these folks spend their working lives serving people who do not want to be served. They can be very inventive.

Good luck to them!

The b***h has it coming.

44 posted on 02/22/2008 7:15:19 AM PST by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Why, hell, if they wouldn’t indict her for murder, tampering with evidence, illegal cattle futures trading, grand theft, witness tampering, perjury, suborning of perjury, slander, and obstruction of justice, why would she worry about being subpoenaed for a crummy little court appearance . . . Sir Madam Shrillery, Her Royal Thighness, just doesn’t want to go to court . . . so, there! I mean, c’mon!


45 posted on 02/22/2008 7:15:35 AM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: octobersky
Obama should bring it up.

I would love to see Obama serve her at the beginning of the next debate as they walk toward each other to shake hands at the beginning.

I can fantasize, can't I?

46 posted on 02/22/2008 7:22:00 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

If she is a party to a civil action than she has been served with the complaint and summons and is subject to the jurisdiction of the court and may only needs a notice to appear served on her attorney?


47 posted on 02/22/2008 7:23:31 AM PST by street_lawyer (Truth is a defense and the best offense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

The more he tries to help the cover up and the more the federal election commission helps him, the bigger the scandal gets as the cover up and corruption continue, one of the larger Media Outlets will pick it up, because being complicit in not reporting will eventually cause a public uproar.

I am forwarding this to Drudge, and and then to the Drudge Retort, where Mike Barnicle links up, along wiht other yellow dogs.

We must tempt them with the news and evidence and maybe one of the outlets will feel the need to post the real news, about the Clintons, and the Hollywod Hustle.


48 posted on 02/22/2008 7:24:18 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Re: Yup! Video every attempt, and put them on Youtube!

I agree. Video them all. Then interview the server for an explanation and put them on YouTube.


49 posted on 02/22/2008 7:24:55 AM PST by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
A local county sheriff can serve her at any public function or at any hotel she might be staying at. Any interference by any party would be obstruction of justice and that person could be arrested by the sheriff. I don't think anyone would attempt to prevent a deputy sheriff from doing his job. That would be obstructing a law enforcdement officer.
50 posted on 02/22/2008 7:26:14 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson