Skip to comments.
McCain's sweeping denial may have hole
Newsweek ^
| Feb 22, 2008
| Michael Isikoff
Posted on 02/22/2008 10:58:30 AM PST by HapaxLegamenon
A sworn deposition that Sen. John McCain gave in a lawsuit more than five years ago appears to contradict one part of a sweeping denial that his campaign issued this week to rebut a New York Times story about his ties to a Washington lobbyist.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bimboeruption; democrats; iseman; liberalpoliticians; mccain; spikey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-77 next last
Doesn't look good.
To: HapaxLegamenon
This is rich coming from Spikey Isikoff...
2
posted on
02/22/2008 10:59:46 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: HapaxLegamenon
To hell with Michael Isikoff.
3
posted on
02/22/2008 10:59:54 AM PST
by
Petronski
(Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
To: HapaxLegamenon
McCain WAS at the party at Canseco’s house?
To: HapaxLegamenon
Isikoff? Wasn’t that the Koran in the Toilet in Gitmo writer?
5
posted on
02/22/2008 11:01:37 AM PST
by
padre35
(Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
To: HapaxLegamenon; pissant; Ultra Sonic 007; Duncan Hunter; Duncan Hunter Ambassador
Well, it looks like McCain has gone and let himself get caught in a bald face lie on live national television.
The best thing he could do now is gracefully exit the presidential race and turn all his delegates over to Duncan Hunter, who will go on to trash Obama during the general election... :)
6
posted on
02/22/2008 11:03:47 AM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: HapaxLegamenon
So, five years later he didn’t remember a particular conversation. I don’t think it’s that big of a deal. What he has said is that he wrote a letter asking an agency to please make a decision on a matter that had been pending for twice as long as it usually took matters to get through that agency. But he was careful to say that he was not asking them to decide in favor of Paxson. I just fail to see anything wrong with that. And the fact that they keep trying to make this into something is beyond belief.
To: HapaxLegamenon
McCain draws scrutiny over $1m loan to campaign
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/21/johnmccain.barackobama
[snip]Feb. 22, 2008 - The Federal Election Commission (FEC) released a letter to McCain today that questions his ability to withdraw from the presidential public financing system and avoid the spending limits that come with it. The FEC asked McCain to explain whether he used public funds as collateral for a $1m bank loan last month, a move that would commit him to a taxpayer-funded campaign.
The query is especially awkward on a day the senator is fighting allegations he had an affair with a lobbyist, and given that he has blasted Obama for appearing to hedge on his pledge to accept public financing for the general election. The likely Republican nominee accused Obama of Washington doublespeak yesterday, noting that both men agreed to take taxpayer funds and play by the rules that doing so entails.
8
posted on
02/22/2008 11:05:09 AM PST
by
AuntB
('If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
To: HapaxLegamenon
Gov. Huckabee, please pick up the Red Courtesy Phone.
9
posted on
02/22/2008 11:06:02 AM PST
by
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
To: padre35
10
posted on
02/22/2008 11:06:10 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: padre35
Isikoff is the guy who couldn’t pull the trigger in the Monica Lewinski story.
11
posted on
02/22/2008 11:06:25 AM PST
by
TommyDale
(Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
To: lady lawyer
The goal here is to tie McCain up in knots and spend all his time answering old/ancient he said/she said and innuendo ... so he can not campaign and state policy and principle.
12
posted on
02/22/2008 11:06:31 AM PST
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: HapaxLegamenon
REALLY desperately reaching to find anything to keep the story alive.. Read what the article is actually claiming. The two statements do not contradict each other in any way shape or form. This is pathetic even by "they flushed a Koran at Gitmo" Newsweak standards. He said he was contacted by Paxson, not by the Lobbyist as the Times, and now Newsweak, claims.
No matter how much one may dislike McCain, this is just inexcusably sloppy "journalism"
Just hours after the Times's story was posted, the McCain campaign issued a point-by-point response that depicted the letters as routine correspondence handled by his staffand insisted that McCain had never even spoken with anybody from Paxson or Alcalde & Fay about the matter. "No representative of Paxson or Alcalde & Fay personally asked Senator McCain to send a letter to the FCC," the campaign said in a statement e-mailed to reporters. But that flat claim seems to be contradicted by an impeccable source: McCain himself. "I was contacted by Mr. Paxson on this issue," McCain said in the Sept. 25, 2002, deposition obtained by NEWSWEEK. "He wanted their approval very bad for purposes of his business. I believe that Mr. Paxson had a legitimate complaint.
13
posted on
02/22/2008 11:06:37 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
To: mewzilla
14
posted on
02/22/2008 11:07:38 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: MNJohnnie
15
posted on
02/22/2008 11:08:16 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(GITMO is way too nice of a place to house low life terrorists.)
To: mewzilla
Must be Mike is really getting his rocks off with the McCain story since he was never allowed to report the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal.
16
posted on
02/22/2008 11:09:02 AM PST
by
mass55th
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
17
posted on
02/22/2008 11:09:06 AM PST
by
stuartcr
(Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
To: Petronski
That did not take long. We all knew that the MSM would turn on him when he got the nomination, but he has even won that yet! Sheesh.
To: mass55th
Must be Mike is really getting his rocks off with the McCain story since he was never allowed to report the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal.LOL. One wonders what Spikey's sitting on at this very moment....
19
posted on
02/22/2008 11:10:23 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: K-oneTexas
No doubt. I didn’t like McCain at all. But the pundits are right. This kind of crap is beginning to make me a supporter. Just as I became a Romney supporter only after Huckabee started his anti-Mormon schtick.
As for the election, politics is the art of the possible. McCain may be bad, but Obama is so much worse it’s not even funny. Elections are usually about the lesser of two evils. It’s time to grow up.
To: HapaxLegamenon
“”McCain’s sweeping denial may have hole””
OK, I’m convinced...now lets get Romney back on the ticket.
21
posted on
02/22/2008 11:11:52 AM PST
by
NRG1973
To: HapaxLegamenon
22
posted on
02/22/2008 11:12:45 AM PST
by
ElkGroveDan
(When you choose the lesser of two evils, you still have evil.)
To: lady lawyer
So, five years later he didnt remember a particular conversation. In certain respects this reminds me of Scooter Libby. You can get in a lot of trouble by remembering things incorrectly.
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Poor use of a headline for a story that implies McCain had an affair.
24
posted on
02/22/2008 11:14:06 AM PST
by
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
To: lady lawyer
Well said, I was thinking the exact same thing when I read your post.
25
posted on
02/22/2008 11:15:28 AM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: ClearCase_guy
This is especially ridiculous when you consider that a senator probably talks with hundreds of people every week. Their entire day is taken up with meetings.
To: HapaxLegamenon
Doesn’t look good you say, it depends on what the meaning of is “is”. From the article, “I was contacted by Mr. Paxson on this issue,” hmmm a phone call is not a meeting. Believe me, if you ever been depoed, you answer the question and nothing else to get those blood sucking, bottom feeding fisher out of your face.
27
posted on
02/22/2008 11:16:19 AM PST
by
11th Commandment
(Elect Conservatives- if you don't vote for McCain, at least work to elect conservatives!)
To: HapaxLegamenon
I agree, what Freepers don't realize, is that McCain has been given a FREE PASS by the media - because they felt he stood up to the rightwing in the Republican party.
So they never really investigated him at all. Now, he's the frontrunner so he's getting the scrutiny any others would get.
McCain has committed countless flip-flops and has had throughout his career countless relationships and business deals which give the impression of impropriety.
28
posted on
02/22/2008 11:17:07 AM PST
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: HapaxLegamenon; lady lawyer; Petronski
I couldn’t open it, page expired. LL, this is just typical liberal rhetoric designed to time with the primaries. Nothing short of fantastic, yes, but very short of believable.
29
posted on
02/22/2008 11:17:38 AM PST
by
Froufrou
To: MNJohnnie
>> No matter how much one may dislike McCain, this is just inexcusably sloppy “journalism”
You’re right to put journalism in quotes.
This is not journalism at all, it’s a naked attempt to manipulate the election.
30
posted on
02/22/2008 11:18:04 AM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
To: HapaxLegamenon
Fake but Accurate.
We heard it all mikey, now go away.
31
posted on
02/22/2008 11:18:15 AM PST
by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: Froufrou
It’s all about the “gotcha.” I have no love for John McCain, but this is obscene.
32
posted on
02/22/2008 11:18:40 AM PST
by
Petronski
(Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
To: HapaxLegamenon
33
posted on
02/22/2008 11:18:48 AM PST
by
rrrod
To: All
LOL, it seems a few “conservatives” are attempting to emulate the unbiased reporters from the NYSlimes. What a joke you people are.
34
posted on
02/22/2008 11:18:52 AM PST
by
rbmillerjr
("bigger government means constricting freedom"....................RWR)
To: HapaxLegamenon
Thought for the day: Empty-suit and blank resume Obama won the landslide victory for the US Senate for Illinois due to a conveniently announced sex scandal involving the GOP candidate. How do you spell deja vu?
To: HapaxLegamenon
McCain's subsequent letters to the FCCcoming around the same time that Paxson's firm was flying the senator to campaign events aboard its corporate jet and contributing $20,000 to his campaign Sounds like a political kickback to me!
36
posted on
02/22/2008 11:19:56 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: HapaxLegamenon
So is anyone surprised? Why do you think the MSM and the RATS wanted McCain for the dream candidate? Stuff, stuff and more stuff. Made up or true; makes no difference. It will keep coming. Support McCain or don’t. But this kind of stuff shouldn’t influence your decision, if you have a brain. This stuff is irrelevant as to what McCain is, for good or ill.
37
posted on
02/22/2008 11:20:52 AM PST
by
isrul
To: HapaxLegamenon
I can’t helped but be reminded that it was lord McCain that pulled together a gang of 14 to protect the Senate body in their neglect of advise and consent of Presidential nominees. Yet here McCain is allllll about using his particular power as oversight body demanding an act sooner rather than later for the good of lobbyists. What was that number recently cited by President Bush, of vacancies waiting for up or down vote by Senator McCain more respected body also known as the US Senate... 200????
It is a known and or a given one does reap what they sow.
38
posted on
02/22/2008 11:22:50 AM PST
by
Just mythoughts
(Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
To: HapaxLegamenon
Someone should have warned McCain that his cozy relationship with the press was only superficial.
39
posted on
02/22/2008 11:32:47 AM PST
by
Rudder
To: HapaxLegamenon
This is a lose/lose for McCain.
What can his excuse for contradicting himself be? His advanced age?
Wait for Obama to remind people during the campaign that McCain is old enough to be his father.
40
posted on
02/22/2008 11:40:42 AM PST
by
elizabetty
(Mike Huckabee is such a loser he does not even recognized he lost a long time ago.)
To: padre35
Newsweek? I’ll try to check out his article the next time I’m at the dentist. I think he subscribes.
To: Petronski; lady lawyer
Oh course, you’re right; the timing tells it all.
42
posted on
02/22/2008 11:52:12 AM PST
by
Froufrou
To: Virginia Ridgerunner; HapaxLegamenon
Can we have a “do-over” of the GOP primaries??? I live in Ohio and haven’t voted yet!!
43
posted on
02/22/2008 11:54:24 AM PST
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
This isn’t his first lie in front of cameras. I cannot feel sorry for him after what he did to Mitt Romney.
To: HapaxLegamenon
Speaking as probably the only FReeper who has actually spoken to Isikoff, all I have to say is that I’ll believe theis when someone produces actual EVIDENCE!
But he did cheat on his first wife (with Cindy.) And he married money the second time around. So his vaunted “integrity” is a little soiled.
45
posted on
02/22/2008 11:57:24 AM PST
by
TBP
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
in your dreams and only in YOUR dreams
46
posted on
02/22/2008 11:58:34 AM PST
by
OnRiver
(Who is a conservative really...)
To: Rudder
Someone should have warned McCain that his cozy relationship with the press was only superficial.Someone should have warned McCain that his cozy relationship with the press was improper.
47
posted on
02/22/2008 12:00:31 PM PST
by
TBP
To: mewzilla
>>>
This is rich coming from Spikey Isikoff...<<<
The "hole" in the story is from where Isikoff spiked it for about 6 years until the "timing was just right for maximum negative impact on a McCain candidacy.
The Democrats play by a different rule book than us. They are masters of political sabotage.....and we walk around in a fog wondering "what happened".
48
posted on
02/22/2008 12:00:34 PM PST
by
HardStarboard
(Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
To: elizabetty
This is a lose/lose for McCain.Poor McCain. Looks as if the MSM is going to Vladimir his putin.
49
posted on
02/22/2008 12:00:44 PM PST
by
E. Cartman
(Huckaboob will never be Vice President.)
To: HapaxLegamenon
Mikey I is a hard core leftist nutjob with a depth of hatred for Repub that can never be measured.Newsweek aka News speak ,The Pravda of the dying news magazine world has been marginalized years ago.
50
posted on
02/22/2008 12:03:17 PM PST
by
ncalburt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson