Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gravity Powered Lamp, Designed By Student, Provides As Much Light As 40 Watt Bulb
Science Daily ^ | 2-22-2008 | Virginia Tech

Posted on 02/22/2008 11:27:17 AM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: Age of Reason
WIND-UP BED SIDE LAMP

This is for people who can’t sleep without the light. Also, people who read in the bed sometimes forget to turn off the light. The key functions as a switch and a timer. Wind-up to turn the light on before you go to bed. The light will stay on until the key winds back. You will come to know how many times you need to wind-up. Its main source of power comes from its powerful spring-driven generator. As the high carbon tensile steel spring unwinds, power is transferred to a small dynamo electric generator which produces enough electricity to power of the light.

wind-up-lamp01.jpg

wind-up-lamp02.jpg

wind-up-lamp03.jpg

41 posted on 02/22/2008 11:50:08 AM PST by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: blam

LEDs are the future my FRiends.


42 posted on 02/22/2008 11:50:41 AM PST by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
Would that be a grandfather or cuckoo clock?

Don't talk to me about prior art. The patent office doesn't pay much attention to it, so why should I? :-).

After looking at the first place "EnerJar" which is just a power meter similar to the already commercially available Kill-a-watt meter, I have to say that the lamp designers were robbed. The lamp is more innovative than the power meter.

43 posted on 02/22/2008 11:50:54 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: blam

I spent what I though was too much money (20 bucks) on one of those wind up lights at Brookstone or the like.

However I use the crap out of it as it is the only one in the house that works cause I always leave them on.

And if there is ever an intruder in the house I can use it as a weapon as it is pretty chunky too!


44 posted on 02/22/2008 11:51:03 AM PST by freedomlover (Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blam

When mass produced they will get the price down to about ....................................................


45 posted on 02/22/2008 11:53:06 AM PST by fella (Is he al-taquiya or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket

Just a thought. What if you put it in an hourglass type holder where you just turned it over?


46 posted on 02/22/2008 11:53:24 AM PST by Richard Kimball (Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: blam
"A patent is pending on the Gravia."

The patent process seems to have evolved into granting a patent for just about anything. While the design is attractive, I cannot see anything unique about the mechanism. Falling mass to turn a rotor to generate electricity to light a light seems like I recall that being done before.

47 posted on 02/22/2008 11:55:01 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Democrats= Phony Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Very nice!
Surprised that it is not mounted on trunnions, then just invert it to cycle?


48 posted on 02/22/2008 11:55:47 AM PST by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232
When he gets it so I can just turn the device over, like a hour glass...

He should mount it on a swivel, so the user can just flip it 180 degrees when needed. Would take about 3 seconds.

49 posted on 02/22/2008 11:59:57 AM PST by Max in Utah (A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT
If it had trunnions, it’d be from British Leyland.
50 posted on 02/22/2008 12:00:04 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: blam

It’s not really powered by gravity, it’s powered by the “lifting” of the weight to a higher position. Some of that work is recovered by the falling weight.


51 posted on 02/22/2008 12:00:34 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
It’s clever, it’s not innovative or brilliant, but it’s a great use of existing technology.

I’d buy one of them. I’m using three lamps with 25 watt bulbs in my living room right now (technically, I’m not using any right now, but I’ll turn on up to three, depending on what I’m doing), so this would fit my needs pretty well.

Plus, if you only use a 40 watt bulb, and only entertain in the evening, you don’t need to paint the room as often.

Anyone good with linear induction motors? You can build a linear induction generator, can you reverse a linear induction motor to make an AC generator? How efficient are they? I’m not great with magnetism. Moving a 550 lbs weight 1 foot per second costs about 0.75 KWs. If I slow a 550 lbs magnets’s decent with a conductor (inducing a current), to 1 foot per minute (1/60th), how do I calculate the power produced? And, am I right that the speed of the magnet relative to the conductor determines voltage? If so, I’m not really producing any voltage at 1 foot per minute, right?.

52 posted on 02/22/2008 12:03:44 PM PST by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Should be called the “human powered light”.


53 posted on 02/22/2008 12:09:16 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Such devices must be banned until the utility companies figure a way to meter their use and charge accordingly ./sarc
54 posted on 02/22/2008 12:09:42 PM PST by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Very cool. It’d be a nice and interesting addition to my home.


55 posted on 02/22/2008 12:10:51 PM PST by scan59 (Let consumers dictate market policies. Government just gets in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; blam
I agree. It is not "gravity powered". It is powered by the human who lifts the weight every four hours. If the drop is four feet, and the weight is one pound, that is four foot-pounds of work done by the human...

It is no more "gravity powered" than those old clocks where you had to wind the weight back to the top every week...

56 posted on 02/22/2008 12:12:27 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Forty wats isn’t much light though.

Yeah ... but it's 40 watts per column. You can make lamps with more than one column.

A perfect tent or trailer camping device....

57 posted on 02/22/2008 12:13:41 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
It looks like the inventor was a little bit off. It has a 50 pound weight dropping over 58 inches (well, a little less since the whole thing is 58 inches). That is only 328 joules (or watt seconds) of energy. Spread out over 4 hours that is only 23 milliwatts of power on average. You aren't matching a 40 watt incandescent bulb with that.
58 posted on 02/22/2008 12:14:52 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NYFriend

OK, I’m stupid. I don’t need the generator to be linear, I can use a wheel or spool to convert linear movement to rotory.


59 posted on 02/22/2008 12:16:10 PM PST by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: blam

This is awful!

This will result in more fossil fuels being used.

If we measure the additional calories expended to move the weights we can quickly see that this will require more food, and increase water use...


60 posted on 02/22/2008 12:19:39 PM PST by NoLibZone (If the Clinton years were so great, why is Osama doing so well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson